UN
ITED

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF

(Rule 14a-101)

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Consent Solicitation Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant 

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule

14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material under

§240.14a-12
240.14a–12

CRESTWOOD EQUITY PARTNERS LP

(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

N/A

(NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT)

Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

No fee required.

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules

14a-6(i) 14a–6(i)(1)
and
0-11.
0–11.


LOGO


 

 

 

  Letter


LOGO

CRESTWOOD EQUITY PARTNERS LP

811 Main Street, Suite 3400

Houston, Texas 77002

To holders of our preferred units:

As announced on August 16, 2023, we have entered into a definitive merger agreement with Energy Transfer LP pursuant to Unitholders

Dear Fellow Crestwood Unitholders,

On behalfwhich Energy Transfer will acquire Crestwood. In connection with the merger and at the direction of Energy Transfer, pursuant to the merger agreement, we are soliciting consents from holders of our preferred units to approve certain proposed amendments to our partnership agreement. The purpose of the BoardConsent Solicitation is to (i) increase the cash redemption price for our preferred units in connection with a cash redemption election in the merger, and (ii) conform certain terms of Directorsour preferred units with Energy Transfer’s other outstanding series of preferred units in order to simplify Energy Transfer’s capital structure following the merger. This consent solicitation is being conducted pursuant to a consent solicitation statement on Schedule 14A, which is filed with the Securities and managementExchange Commission. If the requisite consents in this consent solicitation are obtained and the conditions to the closing of Crestwood, I am pleasedthe merger are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to invite youthe merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, the proposed amendment would, among other things, (i) permit us to increase the redemption price payable to holders of our preferred units that make a cash redemption election in connection with the merger; (ii) eliminate the application of a deficiency rate with respect to distributions payable to the holders of preferred units during any quarter in which distributions are accrued and unpaid; (iii) modify the right of holders of our preferred units to participate in special distributions made to holders of our second annual meetingcommon units; and (iv) conform the voting rights of unitholdersthe holders of preferred units to the voting rights of holders of Energy Transfer’s other outstanding series of preferred units. If the requisite consents in this consent solicitation are obtained and the conditions to the closing of the merger are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, (i) holders of our preferred units making a redemption election in connection with the consideration they receive in the merger would receive such cash redemption price as increased pursuant to the proposed amendment and (ii) holders of our preferred units electing to receive preferred units of Energy Transfer with substantially similar terms as our preferred units as consideration in the merger will receive such Energy Transfer preferred units with terms reflecting the proposed amendment.

The proposed amendment would be approved and go into effect if holders of at least two-thirds of the issued and outstanding preferred units consent to the proposed amendment and the conditions to the closing of the merger are either satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated. Holders of our preferred units who wish to consent must deliver their properly submitted consent in accordance with The Depository Trust Company’s Automated Tender Offer Program at or prior to 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, May 11,October 17, 2023 at 2:00 pm CDT, which(subject to earlier conclusion, termination or extension). We realize your time is valuable, and consequently, we are offering a consent fee of $0.182546 per preferred unit to be paid to holders of preferred units who validly provide (and do not revoke) their consent to the proposed amendment.

In addition, separately from the solicitation of consents to approve the proposed amendment, we will be held virtually via live webcast. Your participationsoliciting votes from holders of our common units and holders of our preferred units to approve the completion of the merger. We will conduct such solicitation pursuant to a separate proxy statement on Schedule 14A, which preliminary merger proxy statement is contained in the meetingRegistration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-274526), filed by Energy Transfer with the U.S. Securities and voteExchange Commission on September 27, 2023. Following effectiveness of such Registration Statement on Form S-4, we will file and mail the definitive merger proxy statement to the Crestwood unitholders.

If the merger is completed, each of our preferred units outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will, at the election of the holder of such preferred units, in accordance with our partnership agreement, either (i) convert into common units at the then-applicable Conversion Ratio (as defined in the Crestwood Partnership Agreement, currently one Crestwood common unit for 10 Crestwood preferred units), subject to the payment of any accrued but unpaid distributions prior to the effective time of the merger, (ii) convert into a preferred unit of Energy Transfer that has substantially similar terms, including with respect to economics and


structural protections, as our preferred units, as such preferred unit terms may be amended if the requisite consents are obtained in connection with this consent solicitation or (iii) be redeemed in exchange for cash or common units, at the sole discretion of our general partner, at a price of (x) $9.218573 per preferred unit or (y) if the requisite consents are obtained in this consent solicitation, $9.857484 per preferred unit, in each case, plus accrued and unpaid distributions to the date of such redemption. If no election is made by a holder of our preferred units, such holder will be deemed to have elected to receive the new preferred units of Energy Transfer. We have agreed to cause our general partner to elect to pay cash for any preferred units whose holders have elected to have such preferred units redeemed as described in clause (iii) above. Holders of our preferred units that receive our common units pursuant to the foregoing clause (i) will be entitled to receive 2.07 common units of Energy Transfer, each representing a limited partner interest in Energy Transfer, in exchange for each such common unit at the effective time of the merger.

IF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS APPROVED BY THE REQUISITE HOLDERS OF PREFERRED UNITS, THE CONSIDERATION YOU MAY ELECT TO RECEIVE IN THE MERGER, AS A HOLDER OF PREFERRED UNITS, WILL BE AFFECTED IN THE FOLLOWING WAY: (A) IF YOU ELECT TO RECEIVE PREFERRED UNITS OF ENERGY TRANSFER, SUCH PREFERRED UNITS WILL HAVE TERMS REFLECTING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT, AND (B) IF YOU MAKE A CASH REDEMPTION ELECTION, THE CASH REDEMPTION PRICE WILL INCREASE FROM $9.218573 TO $9.857484 PER PREFERRED UNIT. WE WILL ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS OF THE CONSENT SOLICITATION AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE FOLLOWING THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS CONSENT SOLICITATION, AND WE ANTICIPATE THAT YOU WILL HAVE AT LEAST 10 DAYS BETWEEN SUCH ANNOUNCEMENT AND THE DEADLINE TO MAKE A MERGER CONSIDERATION ELECTION FOR YOUR PREFERRED UNITS.

Your consent is important — please readto us and our business. Your broker cannot provide a consent with respect to your preferred units on your behalf until it receives your instructions. Please provide your consent by following the proxy materials and follow the voting instructions to ensure your units are represented at the meeting.

This unitholder meeting allows me to thank our Board of Directors and management team for their dedication and execution in repositioning Crestwood to meet current and future industry challenges and take advantage of long-term midstream opportunities. Clearly, in 2022, the US oil and gas industry faced numerous challenges including global supply and demand disruption, commodity price volatility, cost inflation and supply chain issues leading to modest capital investmentcontained in the upstream and midstream sectors comparedConsent Solicitation Statement. We look forward to previous cycles. The industry has now shifted to roughly maintaining current oil and gas supply levels, with minimal growth, through better capital efficiency resulting in improved returns to investors. We believe Crestwood’s regional consolidation strategy, initiated in 2021 and completed in early 2023 with the sale of our Tres Palacios natural gas storage facility, best positions the Partnership to compete in this environment and deliver stable unitholder returns with long-term growth upside potential related to stronger commodity prices in late 2023 and beyond.your participation.

With this strategy in mind during 2022, Crestwood achieved its goal of becoming a top-tier gatherer and processor in the Williston, Delaware and Powder River basins with critical midstream infrastructure that supports

significant long-term supply development in these regions. We executed on a plan, through acquisitions and divestitures, to core up our competitive position in oil-weighted resource plays, and divest our legacy, low-growth assets in gas weighted basins. The pace and cadence of these strategic transactions allowed us to maintain a strong balance sheet with liquidity and flexibility for future consolidation opportunities should they arise. The combination of the Arrow and Rough Rider assets in the Williston, the Crestwood Permian Joint Venture, Nautilus and Sendero assets in the Delaware and the interconnection of large, dedicated Continental Resources acreage blocks in the Powder River basin enabled Crestwood to build scale around our core assets, streamline operations and realize cost savings and high grade producer customers resulting in substantial, long-term acreage dedications with significant economic drilling locations in each of the basins we operate. Additionally, we issued our first Carbon Management Plan which highlights our commitment to actionable emission intensity reductions of acquired midstream assets through Crestwood’s industry leading ESG platform. All in all, 2022 was a critical year in repositioning our asset portfolio for long-term value creation, and we are very pleased with how Crestwood is positioned for the future.

LOGO   Sincerely,

 

Robert G. Phillips

Founder, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer



Letter
CRESTWOOD EQUITY PARTNERS LP

811 Main Street, Suite 3400

Houston, Texas 77002

CONSENT SOLICITATION STATEMENT

Solicitation of Consents to UnitholdersAmend the

Partnership Agreement from


In
Holders of Preferred Units (CUSIP No. 226344307)

Holders of Preferred Units:

On August 16, 2023, we plan to execute on a core-asset optimization strategy which will focus on driving lower operating and organizational costs from recent acquisitions and divestitures, connecting a record number of new wells planned by our producers, and reducing growth capital year over year. Looking forward, we will utilize a disciplined capital allocation strategy that delivers both near term debt reduction and a high-returning accretive capital program to increase system capacity where needed for future producer development and add to our long-term dedicated inventory position.

Capturing these opportunities over the next few years should provide Crestwood’s investors with improved visibility to increasing free cash flow, debt reduction back to our long-term 3.5x leverage target, and greater distribution growth and coverage potential which should lead to attractive capital allocation priorities that drive value creation for our investors.

Finally, I am also pleased to acknowledge the entire Crestwood organization by highlighting recognition from leading third-party organizations for our efforts in sustainability, customer service and operations, and investor and employee relations. These awards include an upgrade to an A rating by MSCI, inclusion into the Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index for the third consecutive year, #1 rankings in customer service and operations by EnergyPoint Research, numerous #1 rankings by Institutional Investor, and for five consecutive years, recognition as one of Houston Chronicle’s Top Workplaces. These accomplishments exemplify Crestwood’s commitment to being a leading midstream operator with a sharp focus on safety, customer service, environmental stewardship, community engagement and a best-in-class employer to our valued employees.

We look forward to the upcoming annual meeting and remain appreciative of your on-going support and investment in Crestwood.

Sincerely,

LOGO

Robert G. Phillips

Founder, Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

LOGO

Carlsbad Processing Plant acquired from Sendero Midstream in July 2022


  About Crestwood

Crestwood Equity Partners LP, (NYSE: CEQP) is a publicly traded masterDelaware limited partnership that owns(the “Partnership”, “CEQP”, “we”, “us”, or “our”), entered into an Agreement and operates midstream assets located primarilyPlan of Merger (the “merger agreement”) with Energy Transfer LP (“Energy Transfer”), Pachyderm Merger Sub LLC, a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Transfer (“Merger Sub”), and, solely for the purposes of Sections 2.1(a), 2.1(b), 2.1(c) and 5.21 thereof, LE GP, LLC, pursuant to which the Partnership will merge with and into Merger Sub (the “merger”), with Merger Sub surviving the merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Transfer. If the merger is completed, each Preferred Unit (as defined below) outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will, at the election of the holder of such Preferred Units, in accordance with the Partnership Agreement (as defined below), either (i) convert into Common Units (as defined below) at the then-applicable Conversion Ratio (as defined in the Williston Basin,Crestwood Partnership Agreement, currently one Crestwood common unit for 10 Crestwood preferred units), subject to the payment of any accrued but unpaid distributions prior to the effective time of the merger, (ii) convert into a new Energy Transfer security that has substantially similar terms, including with respect to economics and structural protections, as the Preferred Units, as such Preferred Unit terms may be amended if the requisite consents are obtained in connection with this consent solicitation or (iii) be redeemed in exchange for cash or Common Units, at the sole discretion of the Managing General Partner, at a price of (x) $9.218573 per Preferred Unit or (y) if the requisite consents are obtained in this consent solicitation, $0.182546 per Preferred Unit, in each case, plus accrued and unpaid distributions to the date of such redemption. If no election is made by a holder of our Preferred Units, such holder will be deemed to have elected to receive the new Energy Transfer securities. We have agreed to cause the Managing General Partner to elect to pay cash for any Preferred Units whose holders have elected to have such Preferred Units redeemed as described in clause (iii) above. Holders of our Preferred Units that receive our Common Units pursuant to the foregoing clause (i) will be entitled to receive 2.07 common units of Energy Transfer, each representing a limited partner interest in Energy Transfer, in exchange for each such Common Unit at the effective time of the merger.

In connection with the merger and at the direction of Energy Transfer, pursuant to the merger agreement, the Partnership and Crestwood Equity GP LLC, a Delaware Basinlimited liability company acting in its capacity as managing general partner of the Partnership (the “Managing General Partner”), are conducting a consent solicitation (the “Consent Solicitation”) pursuant to which we are soliciting consents (“Consents”) from the holders (“Preferred Holders”) of the Partnership’s issued and Powder River Basin. Our operationsoutstanding Preferred Units representing limited partner interests (the “Preferred Units”) to approve an amendment of the Partnership’s Sixth Amended and financialRestated Agreement of Limited Partnership, effective as of August 20, 2021 (the “Partnership Agreement”), as such amendment is set forth on Annex A to this Consent Solicitation Statement (the “Proposed Amendment”).

If the Proposed Amendment is approved by the requisite holders of Preferred Units, the consideration you may elect to receive in the merger, as a holder of Preferred Units, will be affected in the following ways: (a) if you elect to receive a new security of Energy Transfer, such security will have terms reflecting the Proposed Amendment, and (b) if you make a cash redemption election, the cash redemption price will increase from $9.218573 to $9.857484 per Preferred Unit. We will announce the results are divided into three segments that include Gathering & Processing North, Gathering & Processing South and Storage & Logistics.of the consent solicitation as promptly as possible following the Expiration Date (as defined below), which announcement is anticipated to be at least 10 days before the deadline to make a merger consideration election for your Preferred Units, assuming the Expiration Date is not extended.


The Proposed Amendment would amend Section 5.8 of the Partnership Agreement as follows:

 

1.

Section 5.8(e)(ii)(D) of the Partnership Agreement provides holders the right to have Preferred Units redeemed at a price equal to 101% of the Preferred Unit Price (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) in the event of a Change of Control (other than a Cash COC Event) (as such terms are defined in the Partnership Agreement). The Proposed Amendment would permit us to increase the redemption price payable to holders making a cash redemption election pursuant to Section 5.8(e)(ii)(D) of the Partnership Agreement in connection with the merger from 101% of the Preferred Unit Price (or $9.218573 per Preferred Unit) to 108% of the Preferred Unit Price (or $9.857484 per Preferred Unit);

 

2.

Section 5.8(c)(i) of the Partnership Agreement provides that in the event the Partnership fails to pay in full in cash any distribution (or portion thereof) which a Preferred Holder is entitled to receive for a quarter under the Partnership Agreement, (i) then the Preferred Unit Distribution Amount (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) for the immediately following quarter will be $0.2567 per quarter (the “Deficiency Rate”) and (ii) any accrued and unpaid distributions will increase at a rate of 2.8125% per quarter. The Proposed Amendment would eliminate the application of (a) the Deficiency Rate with respect to distributions payable to the Preferred Holders during any quarter in which distributions are accrued and unpaid and (b) the 2.8125% rate of increase per quarter to any accrued and unpaid distributions;

KEY CORPORATE HIGHLIGHTS

3.

Section 5.8(c)(i) of the Partnership Agreement provides that each Preferred Unit is entitled to share in any special distributions by the Partnership of cash, securities or other property pro rata with the Partnership’s common units (the “Common Units”) as if the Preferred Units had converted into Common Units. Special distributions do not include regular quarterly distributions paid in the normal course pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, so long as such distributions are not in excess of 130% of the quarterly distribution rate for the prior quarter. The Proposed Amendment would provide Preferred Holders the right to receive (and share pro rata with holders of Common Units in) any portion of any quarterly cash distribution made in the normal course to holders of Common Units that is in excess of an amount that is the greater of (i) the amount of the highest previously paid quarterly cash distribution after the date of the merger and (ii) the amount equal to 115% of the quarterly cash distribution for the immediately preceding quarter; and

4.

Section 5.8(d) of the Partnership Agreement provides that Preferred Holders are entitled to vote as a separate class on any matter that adversely affects the rights, powers, privileges or preferences of the Preferred Units in relation to other classes of Partnership Interests (as defined in the Partnership Agreement). The affirmative vote of a majority of the Preferred Units is required to approve such matters, except that the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Preferred Units is required (such applicable threshold, the “Voting Threshold”) to approve matters (i) that alter the rights and obligations of the Preferred Units in any material respect, increase or decrease the authorized number of Preferred Units, or otherwise adversely affect the Preferred Units or (ii) when the three largest Preferred Holders collectively own two-thirds of the Preferred Units or certain of our initial Preferred Holders own at least 35% of the Preferred Units. Section 5.8(d) of the Partnership Agreement also provides that the Partnership may, without the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Preferred Units, create and issue Junior Securities (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) and Parity Securities (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) in an unlimited amount, with respect to Junior Securities, and, with respect to Parity Securities, in an amount not to exceed $300 million in aggregate face value and that shall not be convertible into more than 48,125,000 Common Units, subject to certain restrictions set forth in the Partnership Agreement. The Proposed Amendment would conform the voting rights of Preferred Holders to the voting rights of holders of Energy Transfer’s other outstanding series of preferred units by (a) eliminating the right of Preferred Holders to vote together, on an as-converted basis, with the Common Units as a single class, (b) providing that the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Preferred Units, voting as a separate class, is required to adopt any amendment to the Partnership Agreement that the Managing General Partner determines would have a material and adverse effect on the rights of the Preferred Units, and (c) providing that the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Preferred Units, voting together as a class with other parity securities, is required to (1) create or issue any Parity Securities if cumulative distributions on the Preferred Units are in arrears or (2) create or issue any Senior Securities (as defined in the Partnership Agreement).


The foregoing is only a summary of the Proposed Amendment. You are urged to read the full text of the Proposed Amendment, which is set forth in Annex A.

If the Requisite Consents (as defined below) are received by the Tabulation Agent (as defined below) through The Depository Trust Company’s (“DTC”) Automated Tender Offer Program (“ATOP”) (and not revoked) at or prior to 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on October 17, 2023 (as may be earlier concluded, terminated or extended, the “Expiration Date”), and the Merger Conditions (as described below) are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, then:

the Partnership will, as promptly as practicable after, and only if, the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, pay to the Preferred Holders from whom properly submitted Consents are received by the Tabulation Agent through ATOP on or prior to the Expiration Date (the “Consenting Holders”) a fee in cash (the “Consent Fee”) equal to $0.182546 for each Preferred Unit with respect to which consents are received (and not revoked) on or prior to the Expiration Date;

the Managing General Partner will execute a First Amendment to the Partnership Agreement (the “First Amendment”), which will contain the Proposed Amendment;

the Proposed Amendment will become effective immediately upon execution of the First Amendment by the Managing General Partner, which is anticipated to be immediately prior to the closing of the merger (the time of such execution, the “Effective Time”); and

in connection with the closing of the merger, (i) Preferred Holders making a redemption election in connection with the consideration they receive in the merger would receive such cash redemption price as increased pursuant to the First Amendment and (ii) Preferred Holders electing to receive a new security of Energy Transfer (“ET Preferred Units”) with substantially similar terms as the Preferred Units as consideration in the merger will receive ET Preferred Units with terms reflecting the First Amendment.

Once the First Amendment is executed by the Managing General Partner, the Partnership Agreement will be amended by the First Amendment, and the Partnership Agreement as so amended shall be in effect until the closing of the merger.

If the Requisite Consents are received by the Tabulation Agent through ATOP (and not revoked) at or prior to the Expiration Date and the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, then upon the Effective Time, the First Amendment will become effective and all holders of the Preferred Units will be bound by the terms and conditions of the Partnership Agreement as so amended by the First Amendment until the closing of the merger (i.e., the Partnership Agreement, inclusive of the Proposed Amendment, will govern the terms of the Preferred Units held by all holders and their transferees, regardless of whether such holders have consented to the Proposed Amendment). If the Requisite Consents are received but the Merger Conditions are not satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated then the First Amendment will not become effective and the Consent Fee will not be paid. Receipt of the Requisite Consents is not a Merger Condition.

We have established the close of business on September 22, 2023 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for determining those Preferred Holders entitled to submit Consents with respect to the Proposed Amendment. For the Proposed Amendment to be approved, Consents must be received by the Tabulation Agent through ATOP from holders of at least two-thirds of the issued and outstanding Preferred Units.

To be counted, your properly submitted Consent must be received by the Tabulation Agent on or before the Expiration Date, subject to earlier conclusion, termination or extension of the Expiration Date at the discretion of the Managing General Partner. CONSENTS MAY BE REVOKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH HEREIN AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE, BUT NOT THEREAFTER.


In addition, separately from the solicitation of consents pursuant to this Consent Solicitation Statement, we will be soliciting votes from holders of Common Units and Preferred Holders (collectively, “Crestwood unitholders”) to approve the completion of the merger (the “Merger Approvals”). Such solicitation will be conducted by the Partnership pursuant to a separate proxy statement on Schedule 14A (the “Merger Proxy Statement”). The preliminary Merger Proxy Statement is contained in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-274526), filed by Energy Transfer with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on September 27, 2023 (the “Merger S-4”). Following effectiveness of the Merger S-4, the Partnership will file and mail the definitive Merger Proxy Statement to the Crestwood unitholders. The merger is subject to a number of conditions to closing as specified in the merger agreement (the “Merger Conditions”). The Merger Conditions include, among others, (i) approval of a proposal to approve and adopt the merger agreement by Crestwood unitholders, (ii) the absence of any legal order preventing consummation of the merger, (iii) the expiration or termination of any waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, (iv) receipt of legal opinions regarding certain tax-related matters, (v) the absence of a material adverse effect on Energy Transfer or the Partnership, and (vi) the Merger S-4 having been declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933 and no stop order suspending the effectiveness of such registration statement having been issued by the SEC, nor proceedings seeking a stop order having been initiated or threatened by the SEC. If the merger is completed, each Preferred Unit outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will, at the election of the Preferred Holder, in accordance with the Partnership Agreement then in effect, (i) convert into Common Units at the then-applicable Conversion Ratio, subject to the payment of any accrued but unpaid distributions prior to such merger effective time, (ii) convert into a new Energy Transfer security that has substantially similar terms, including with respect to economics and structural protections, as the Preferred Units, as such Preferred Unit terms may be amended if the Requisite Consents are obtained in connection with this Consent Solicitation or (iii) be redeemed in exchange for cash or Common Units, at the sole discretion of the Managing General Partner at a price of (x) $9.218573 per Preferred Unit or (y) if the Requisite Consents are obtained in this Consent Solicitation, $9.857484 per Preferred Unit, in each case, plus accrued and unpaid distributions to the date of such redemption. If no election is made by a holder of Preferred Units,such holder will be deemed to have elected to receive new ET Preferred Units. The Partnership has agreed to cause the Managing General Partner to elect to pay cash for any Preferred Units whose holders have elected to have such Preferred Units redeemed as described in clause (iii) above.

We urge you to read the definitive Merger Proxy Statement as it contains important information about the merger, the terms of the ET Preferred Units to be issued to those preferred unitholders who elect to receive such preferred units in the merger, the risks inherent in owning such preferred units, the Merger Conditions, the special meeting of unitholders to be held for the purpose of obtaining the Merger Approvals, and how to make an election regarding the consideration to be received in the merger. All questions and inquiries regarding the merger should be directed in accordance with the instructions set out in the definitive Merger Proxy Statement.

The Preferred Units trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CEQP-P.” The total number of Preferred Units issued and outstanding at September 22, 2023 was 71,257,445. On September 22, 2023, the closing price of the Preferred Units was $9.57 per Preferred Unit.

See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8 for a discussion of risks that you should consider with respect to the Consent Solicitation.


THE CONSENT SOLICITATION HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SEC, ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION, OR THE SIMILAR COMMISSION OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY OF ANY FOREIGN JURISDICTION, NOR HAS THE SEC, ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION, OR THE SIMILAR COMMISSION OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY OF ANY FOREIGN JURISDICTION DETERMINED WHETHER THE INFORMATION IN THIS CONSENT SOLICITATION STATEMENT IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. NONE OF THE SEC, ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION, OR ANY SIMILAR COMMISSION OR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY OF ANY FOREIGN JURISDICTION HAS PASSED UPON THE MERITS OR FAIRNESS OF THE CONSENT SOLICITATION, OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE DISCLOSURE CONTAINED IN THIS CONSENT SOLICITATION STATEMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

We have appointed D.F. King & Co., Inc. as information agent (the “Information Agent”) and the tabulation agent (the “Tabulation Agent” and in both such capacities, the “Information and Tabulation Agent”) in connection with the Consent Solicitation. Its address appears on the back cover of this Consent Solicitation Statement. The Information and Tabulation Agent makes no recommendation as to whether Preferred Holders should deliver Consents in response to the Consent Solicitation.

Requests for assistance in submitting Consents, or for additional copies of this Consent Solicitation Statement, should be directed to the Information Agent. Similarly, questions concerning the terms of the Consent Solicitation should be directed to the Information Agent. The Information and Tabulation Agent’s contact information is set forth on the back cover of this Consent Solicitation Statement.

The Partnership will pay registered brokers and dealers in the United States that deliver consents in the Consent Solicitation from DTC participants and persons resident in the United States (the “Retail SolicitingDealers”) retail soliciting fees. Each Retail Soliciting Dealer that successfully delivers Consents from a retail beneficial owner of the Preferred Units will be eligible to receive a fee (the “Retail Soliciting Fee”) from the Partnership equal to $0.0456365 per Preferred Unit for which a Consent is validly delivered and not revoked by or on behalf of such retail beneficial owner, except for any Preferred Units for which Consents are delivered by a Retail Soliciting Dealer for its own account. The Retail Soliciting Fee will only be paid to each Retail Soliciting Dealer in respect of beneficial owners who deliver Consents in respect of Preferred Units in an aggregate amount of 25,000 Preferred Units or fewer.

The Solicitation Agent for the Consent Solicitation is:

BofA Securities

The date of this Consent Solicitation Statement is September 27, 2023 and is first being mailed to the Preferred Holders on or about September 27, 2023.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

 

Corporate Profile (1)IMPORTANT INFORMATION

  2022 Financial and Operating Stats
ii 

Market CapitalizationCAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

  $2,743 MMiii Net Income$72.5 MM

Units OutstandingSUMMARY

  105.2 MM1 Adjusted EBITDA$762.1 MM

Distribution YieldQUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE CONSENT SOLICITATION

  10%5 Gas Gathering Capacity1.9 Bcf/d

Annualized Distribution per UnitTHE PARTNERSHIP

  $2.627 Gas Processing Capacity1.4 Bcf/d

Full-time EmployeesRISK FACTORS

  753(2)8 Crude Oil Gathering Capacity340 MBbls/d

(1)   Market data as of February 17, 2023

(2)   As of December 31, 2022DESCRIPTION OF THE EQUITY INTERESTS IN THE PARTNERSHIP

  10

PURPOSE OF THE CONSENT SOLICITATION

  15

Background

15

Reasons for the Consent Solicitation

15

Proposed Amendment

15

THE CONSENT SOLICITATION

17

Record Date

17

General

17

Requisite Consents

17

Conditions to the Consent Solicitation

17

How to Consent

17

Expiration Date; Extensions; Amendment

20

Revocation of Consents

20

Consent Fee

21

Expected U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Preferred Holders upon Receipt of the Consent Fee

21

Information and Tabulation Agent

21

Solicitation Agent

22

Retail Soliciting Fee

22

No Appraisal Rights

23

Fees and Expenses

23

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

24

INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN OPPOSITION TO MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON

26

WHERE YOU CAN OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

27

INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE

28

ANNEX A – PROPOSED AMENDMENT

A–1

 

i


IMPORTANT INFORMATION

The Proposed Amendment constitutes a single proposal for purposes of this Consent Solicitation, and a consenting Preferred Holder may only consent to the Proposed Amendment in its entirety and may not consent selectively. The Consent Solicitation is being made upon the terms and subject to the conditions contained in this Consent Solicitation Statement. The Record Date for purposes of the Consent Solicitation is the close of business on September 22, 2023. In the sole discretion of the Managing General Partner, however, we may establish a new date that, when chosen, will be deemed to be the “Record Date” for purposes of the Consent Solicitation. Only Preferred Holders on the Record Date will be entitled to consent to the Proposed Amendment. For purposes of book-entry Preferred Units, only the DTC participants (“DTC Participants”) listed on the official DTC position listing as of the Record Date will be entitled to execute the Consent as the registered holder thereof. When we refer to this “Consent Solicitation Statement,” we are referring not only to this Consent Solicitation Statement, but also to the exhibits and other documents that we refer to in, and incorporate by reference into, this document.

In making your decision, you should rely only on the information contained in this Consent Solicitation Statement or the definitive Merger Proxy Statement or information incorporated herein or therein by reference. We have not, and the Information and Tabulation Agent has not, authorized anyone to provide you with any different or supplemental information. If you receive any such information, you should not rely on it. You should not assume that the information in this Consent Solicitation Statement is accurate as of any date other than the date on the cover page or that information we have incorporated by reference is accurate as of any date other than the date of the document incorporated by reference. The delivery of this Consent Solicitation Statement shall not, under any circumstances, create any implication that the information contained in it is correct as of any time subsequent to the date on the cover page or that there has been no change in the information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this Consent Solicitation Statement. By delivering your Consent to the Tabulation Agent, you represent that you are consenting to the Proposed Amendment based solely on the information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this Consent Solicitation Statement and your own examination of it and the terms of the Proposed Amendment.

The contents of this Consent Solicitation Statement should not be construed as legal, business, or tax advice. You should consult your own attorney, business advisor, and tax advisor as to those matters. This Consent Solicitation Statement does not constitute a solicitation of Consents in any jurisdiction in which, or to or from any person to or from whom, it is unlawful to make the Consent Solicitation. Persons who receive this Consent Solicitation Statement must inform themselves about and observe any applicable restrictions on the distribution and solicitation of Consents.

This Consent Solicitation Statement is not an offer to purchase securities nor is it a solicitation of Consents from Preferred Holders, nor will Consents be accepted from or on behalf of such Preferred Holders, in any jurisdiction in which, or to or from any person to or from whom, it is unlawful to make such a consent solicitation under applicable securities or “blue sky” laws.

DO NOT FOR ANY REASON DELIVER YOUR PREFERRED UNITS TO US, THE MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER, OR THE INFORMATION AND TABULATION AGENT AT THIS TIME.

 

LOGO

CRESTWOOD’S COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE

LOGOii

LOGO


CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

  Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of

  Unitholders

LOGO

Date & Time

Items of Business:

  To elect the three directors named in this proxy statement to serve as Class II directors on the board of directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) of our general partner, Crestwood Equity GP, LLC (the “General Partner”) until the 2026 annual meeting of unitholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualified

 To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, our named executive officer compensation

 To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the Partnership for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023

 To approve an amendment to the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of units authorized for issuance under the plan

 To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof

The Board of Directors has fixed March 15, 2023, as the record date for determining unitholders entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Only unitholders of record at the close of business on that date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

Thursday, May 11, 2023

2:00 p.m., Central Time

LOGO

Virtual Meeting

Register to attend at www.proxydocs.com/CEQP

The Board of Directors

Recommends You Vote:

LOGO   FOR the election of each director nominee

LOGO  FOR the approval of the executive compensation

LOGO   FOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm

LOGO   FOR the amendment to the 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Robert G. Phillips

Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Houston, Texas

March 31, 2023

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Crestwood Equity

Partners LP Unitholder Meeting to be Held on May 11, 2023. The Proxy

Certain information set forth in this Consent Solicitation Statement and documents incorporated herein by reference may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our 2022future plans, strategies, and expectations, can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terms such as “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “seek,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipate” “strategy,” “future,” “likely” or other comparable terms and references to future periods. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Consent Solicitation Statement and documents incorporated herein by reference regarding our strategies, prospects, financial condition, operations, costs, plans, and objectives are forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on our current beliefs, expectations, and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans, and strategies, projections, anticipated events, and trends, the economy, and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results, financial condition, or intentions to take certain corporate actions to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include, in addition to those described in the “Risk Factors” and in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, the inability to secure the Requisite Consents for the Proposed Amendment, market conditions, and potential litigation challenging the Proposed Amendment. In addition, the merger is subject to (i) the satisfaction or waiver of the Merger Conditions, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the absence of events that could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement, (ii) the possibility that the merger does not close, (iii) risks that the proposed merger disrupts current plans and operations and business relationships or poses difficulties in attracting or retaining employees, (iv) the possibility that the costs or difficulties related to the integration of the Partnership and Energy Transfer will be greater than expected and (v) the possibility that the anticipated benefits from the merger cannot or will not be fully realized.

Any forward-looking statement in this Consent Solicitation Statement or any document incorporated herein by reference is based only on information currently available at www.proxydocs.com/CEQPto us and speaks only as of the date on which it is made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable law. You should read this Consent Solicitation Statement completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

THIS CONSENT SOLICITATION STATEMENT (INCLUDING THE DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE HEREIN) CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION THAT SHOULD BE READ BEFORE ANY DECISION IS MADE WITH RESPECT TO THE CONSENT SOLICITATION.

 

iii


  Summary

SUMMARY

This summary highlights some information about us and this ProxyConsent Solicitation Statement. It may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should read this ProxyConsent Solicitation Statement in its entirety together with the definitive Merger Proxy Statement and the more detailed information found in the documents we file with the SEC, including those listed under the heading “Incorporation of Documents by Reference.” You should assume that the information in this ProxyConsent Solicitation Statement is accurate only as of the date of this ProxyConsent Solicitation Statement, or, in the case of documents we previously filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference, as of the date of those documents. Our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may have changed since those dates. In this Proxy Statement, unless specifically noted otherwise, “we,” “us”, “our,”

About the “Company”Partnership

The Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership formed in March 2001, is a master limited partnership that develops, acquires, owns or the “Partnership” refer to Crestwood Equity Partners LPcontrols, and its subsidiaries.

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

LOGO

Date & Time

LOGO

Virtual Meeting

LOGO

Record Date

Thursday, May 11, 2023

2:00 p.m., Central Time

Register to attend at www.proxydocs.com/CEQP

March 15, 2023

Meeting Agendaoperates primarily fee-based assets and Voting Recommendations

Board Voting
Recommendation
Page
Reference

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

FOR               4     

Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote for Executive Compensation

FOR               26     

Proposal 3 – Ratification of Independent Auditor for 2023

FOR               64     

Proposal 4 – Amendment to the 2018 Crestwood Equity

                     Partners LP Long-Term Incentive Plan

FOR               66     

Any additional matters

Board Members

Name

Director
Since
IndependentCommittees

Robert G. Phillips

2010   

Warren H. Gfeller

2001   Nominating & Governance (Chair)

Janeen S. Judah

2018   Nominating & Governance, Sustainability (Chair)

David Lumpkins

2015   Audit, Finance (Chair)

Angela A. Minas

2022   Audit (Chair), Compensation

Gary D. Reaves

2022   Finance

John J. Sherman

2001   Finance, Sustainability

Frances M. Vallejo

2021   Audit, Compensation, Sustainability

Clay C. Williams

2022   Compensation (Chair), Nominating & Governance

LOGOi


Summary      

Integrated Approach to Risk Management

Crestwood is committed to enterprise risk management practices that are inclusive of all disciplinesoperations within the organizationenergy midstream sector. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, we provide broad-ranging infrastructure solutions across the value chain to service premier liquids-rich natural gas and support our goalcrude oil shale plays across the United States. We own and operate a diversified portfolio of shaping ESG in the midstream sector.

Crestwood’s Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process enables our company to remain vigilant and prepared for potential risks to the business

As ESG risks continue to rise in importance to our business and our industry, we are integrating and combining the ESG risk assessment with our ERM process

Assigned key enterprise risks, including ESG-related risks, to each Board Committee for oversight

The final risk profile is reviewed by executive management, the Audit Committee, the Sustainability Committee and the Board of Directors

Board CommitteesRisk Oversight

LOGO

Audit

Practices related to assessing, managing and mitigating risk, including the integrity of our financial statements and financial reporting processes and cybersecurity risks.

LOGO

Sustainability

Sustainability risks including climate-related risks, indigenous rights and relationships, government relations, reputational risk, ESG matters as well as oversight of our sustainability reporting program.

LOGO

Compensation

People and compensation-related risks, employee retention and performance.

LOGO

Finance

Financial risks, including liquidity and capital structure, distribution policy and compliance with material debt instruments.

LOGO

Nominating and Governance

Corporate governance framework, including director appointment, education and evaluation processes, Crestwood’s corporate governance practices and Code of Business Conduct.

LOGO

The Board has responsibility for overall risk oversight for the company.
Committee Chairs regularly report to the full Board providing an opportunity to
identify and discuss any risk-related issues or request additional information.

iiLOGO


      Summary

Corporate Governance Highlights

We remain committed to strong corporate governancenatural gas liquids, crude oil, natural gas, and we demonstrate our corporate responsibility by adhering to the highest ethical standards. Crestwood’s policiesproduced water gathering, processing, storage, disposal, and transportation assets that connect fundamental energy supply with energy demand across North America. Our Common Units are designed to promote exceptional business behavior with a commitment to transparency.

Oversight

Policies & Disclosure

LOGO   Independent Lead Director

LOGO   Eliminated single-trigger Change of Control provisions

LOGO   Annual Board, Committee and Director evaluation process administered by our Independent Lead Director

LOGO   Annual advisory vote on executive compensation

LOGO   Employee and executive compensation tied to sustainability and safety metrics as well as key financial metrics

LOGO   ESG oversight by Board and Sustainability Committee; Cybersecurity oversight by Audit Committee

LOGO   Annual enterprise risk assessment with Board and senior leadership team

LOGO   Clawback Policy

LOGO   Whistleblower Policy

LOGO   Statement on Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

LOGO   Board diversity statement

LOGO   Unit ownership guidelines for directors and executives

LOGO   Annual ESG reporting in alignment with GRI, TCFD and SASB Midstream frameworks

LOGO   Review Corporate Governance Guidelines and Charters annually

LOGO   Published Board skills matrix

*

Bolded highlights were implemented in 2022.

Board Composition

Mix of director tenure, skills and background provides a balance of experience and institutional knowledge with fresh perspectives

LOGO LOGO LOGO
89% 

INDEPENDENT

DIRECTORS

 33% 

WOMEN

DIRECTORS

 44% 

THREE YEARS

OR LESS TENURE

(100% independent directors

on all Board committees)

 22% 

RACIAL AND

ETHNIC GROUP

REPRESENTATION

  

LOGOiii


  Table of Contents

Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change of Control51
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans54
Pay Ratio Disclosure55
Pay vs. Performance56
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS59
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE61
PROPOSAL 3 – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM62
AUDIT AND OTHER FEES63
PROPOSAL 4 – TO APPROVE THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE CRESTWOOD EQUITY PARTNERS LP 2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN (THE “LTIP PROPOSAL”)64
OTHER INFORMATION74

This document includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical or current facts, including statements regarding our environmental and other sustainability plans and goals, made in this document are forward-looking. We use words such as anticipates, believes, expects, future, intends, and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Actual results could differ materially for a variety of reasons. Risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ significantly from management’s expectations are described in our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Website references throughout this document are provided for convenience only, and the contentlisted on the referenced websites is not incorporated by reference into this document.


  Annual Meeting Information

General

The enclosed proxy is solicited byNYSE under the Board of Directors of the General Partner for the Annual Meeting of Unitholders to be held at 2:00 p.m., Central Time, on May 11, 2023,symbol “CEQP” and any adjournment or postponement thereof. We will conduct a virtual online Annual Meeting, so our unitholders can participate from any geographic location with Internet connectivity. We believe this enhances accessibility to our Annual Meeting for all our unitholders and employees. Unitholders may participate in the Annual Meeting by registering at www.proxydocs.com/CEQP and entering the control numberPreferred Units are listed on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy card, or voting instruction form,and may submit questions during, or in advance, of the Annual Meeting. NYSE under the symbol “CEQP-P.”

Our principal executive office is located at 811 Main Street, Suite 3400, Houston, Texas 77002. This proxy statement77002, and our telephone number is first being made available(832) 519-2200. Our website address is https://www.crestwoodlp.com. The information on our website is not part of this Consent Solicitation Statement.

Purpose of the Consent Solicitation

On August 16, 2023, the Partnership and Energy Transfer, among other parties, entered into the merger agreement, pursuant to our unitholderswhich the Partnership will merge with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub surviving the merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Transfer. In connection with the merger and at the direction of Energy Transfer, pursuant to the merger agreement, the Partnership and the Managing General Partner are soliciting Consents from the Preferred Holders to approve the amendment of the Partnership Agreement as set forth in the Proposed Amendment contained in Annex A to this Consent Solicitation Statement. The purpose of the Consent Solicitation is to (i) increase the cash redemption price for the Preferred Units in connection with a cash redemption election in the merger, and (ii) conform certain terms of the Preferred Units with Energy Transfer’s other outstanding series of preferred units in order to simplify Energy Transfer’s capital structure following the merger. The Proposed Amendment would amend Section 5.8 of the Partnership Agreement as follows:

1.

Section 5.8(e)(ii)(D) of the Partnership Agreement provides holders the right to have Preferred Units redeemed at a price equal to 101% of the Preferred Unit Price in the event of a Change of Control (other than a Cash COC Event). The Proposed Amendment would permit us to increase the redemption price payable to holders making a cash redemption election pursuant to Section 5.8(e)(ii)(D) of the Partnership Agreement in connection with the merger from 101% of the Preferred Unit Price (or $9.218573 per Preferred Unit) to 108% of the Preferred Unit Price (or $9.857484 per Preferred Unit);

2.

Section 5.8(c)(i) of the Partnership Agreement provides that in the event the Partnership fails to pay in full in cash any distribution (or portion thereof) which a Preferred Holder is entitled to receive for a quarter under the Partnership Agreement, (i) then the Preferred Unit Distribution Amount for the immediately following quarter will be the Deficiency Rate and (ii) any accrued and unpaid distributions will increase at a rate of 2.8125% per quarter. The Proposed Amendment would eliminate the application of (a) the Deficiency

1


Rate with respect to distributions payable to the Preferred Holders during any quarter in which distributions are accrued and unpaid and (b) the 2.8125% rate of increase per quarter to any accrued and unpaid distributions;

3.

Section 5.8(c)(i) of the Partnership Agreement provides that each Preferred Unit is entitled to share in any special distributions by the Partnership of cash, securities or other property pro rata with the Partnership’s Common Units as if the Preferred Units had converted into Common Units. Special distributions do not include regular quarterly distributions paid in the normal course pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, so long as such distributions are not in excess of 130% of the quarterly distribution rate for the prior quarter. The Proposed Amendment would provide Preferred Holders the right to receive (and share pro rata with holders of Common Units in) any portion of any quarterly cash distribution made in the normal course to holders of Common Units that is in excess of an amount that is the greater of (i) the amount of the highest previously paid quarterly cash distribution after the date of the merger and (ii) the amount equal to 115% of the quarterly cash distribution for the immediately preceding quarter; and

4.

Section 5.8(d) of the Partnership Agreement provides that Preferred Holders are entitled to vote as a separate class on any matter that adversely affects the rights, powers, privileges or preferences of the Preferred Units in relation to other classes of Partnership Interests. The current Voting Threshold provides that the affirmative vote of a majority of the Preferred Units is required to approve such matters, except that the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Preferred Units is required to approve matters (i) that alter the rights and obligations of the Preferred Units in any material respect, increase or decrease the authorized number of Preferred Units, or otherwise adversely affect the Preferred Units or (ii) when the three largest Preferred Holders collectively own two-thirds of the Preferred Units or certain of our initial Preferred Holders own at least 35% of the Preferred Units. Section 5.8(d) of the Partnership Agreement also provides that the Partnership may, without the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Preferred Units, create and issue Junior Securities and Parity Securities in an unlimited amount, with respect to Junior Securities, and, with respect to Parity Securities, in an amount not to exceed $300 million in aggregate face value and that shall not be convertible into more than 48,125,000 Common Units, subject to certain restrictions set forth in the Partnership Agreement. The Proposed Amendment would conform the voting rights of Preferred Holders to the voting rights of holders of Energy Transfer’s other outstanding series of preferred units by (a) eliminating the right of Preferred Holders to vote together, on an as-converted basis, with the Common Units as a single class, (b) providing that the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Preferred Units, voting as a separate class, is required to adopt any amendment to the Partnership Agreement that the Managing General Partner determines would have a material and adverse effect on the rights of the Preferred Units, and (c) providing that the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Preferred Units, voting together as a class with other parity securities, is required to (1) create or issue any Parity Securities if cumulative distributions on the Preferred Units are in arrears or (2) create or issue any Senior Securities.

If the First Amendment becomes operative in connection with the closing of the merger, (i) Preferred Holders making a redemption election in connection with the consideration they receive in the merger would receive such cash redemption price as increased pursuant to the First Amendment and (ii) Preferred Holders electing to receive ET Preferred Units with substantially similar terms as the Preferred Units as consideration in the merger will receive such ET Preferred Units with terms reflecting the First Amendment. We will announce the results of the consent solicitation as promptly as possible following the Expiration Date, which announcement is anticipated to be at least 10 days before the deadline to make a merger consideration election for your Preferred Units, assuming the Expiration Date is not extended.

Requisite Consents

The adoption of the Proposed Amendment requires the consent of Preferred Holders holding at least two-thirds of the issued and outstanding Preferred Units as of the Record Date (the “Requisite Consents”). See “The Consent Solicitation—Requisite Consents.”

2


How to Consent

Preferred Holders who wish to consent to the Proposed Amendment must deliver their properly submitted Consent in accordance with DTC’s ATOP procedures so that it is received on or about March 31, 2023. Referencesbefore the Expiration Date. Do not, for any reason, deliver your Preferred Units to “the Company,” “the Partnership,” “CEQP,” “we,” “us,” “our,” “ours”us, the Managing General Partneror the Information and similar terms referTabulation Agent at this time and do not deliver the Consent to Crestwood Equity Partners LP.any person other than as specified in DTC’s ATOP procedures. See “The Consent Solicitation—How to Consent.”

Outstanding SecuritiesExpiration Date

The Expiration Date is 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on October 17, 2023, unless earlier concluded, terminated or extended as provided for in this Consent Solicitation Statement. We may conclude the Consent Solicitation at the earlier of the Expiration Date or the date on which the Tabulation Agent has received the Requisite Consents.

Consent Fee

If the Requisite Consents are received by the Tabulation Agent through ATOP (and not revoked) at or prior to the Expiration Date and Quorum

Onlythe Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, then the Partnership will, as promptly as practicable after, and only if, the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, pay to the Consenting Holders from whom properly submitted Consents are received by the Tabulation Agent on or prior to the Expiration Date a Consent Fee equal to $0.182546 for each Preferred Unit with respect to which consents are received (and not revoked) on or prior to the Expiration Date. No Consent Fee will be paid with respect to any Preferred Units for which no Consent is delivered on or prior to the Expiration Date, even though the Proposed Amendment, if approved, will bind all holders of recordsuch Preferred Units and their transferees upon the effectiveness of our common unitsthe Proposed Amendment.

Conditions to the Consent Solicitation

The Proposed Amendment will not become operative unless and preferred units (collectively, “Units”) atuntil the closeRequisite Consents are obtained and the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated. If the Requisite Consents are received but the Merger Conditions are not satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, the First Amendment will not become effective and the Consent Fee will not be paid. Receipt of businessthe Requisite Consents is not a Merger Condition. See “The Consent Solicitation—Conditions to the Consent Solicitation.”

Revocation of Consents

Prior to the Consent Effective Date (as defined below), any Preferred Holder may revoke any Consent given as to its Preferred Units or any portion of such Preferred Units. Only a Preferred Holder on March 15, 2023, the record date,Record Date may deliver a Consent or revoke any Consent previously delivered by such Preferred Holder. Any person or entity that becomes a holder of the Preferred Units after the Record Date will not have the authority to deliver a Consent to the Proposed Amendment or to revoke any Consent previously delivered by a Preferred Holder relating to the Preferred Units held by the subsequent holder. Preferred Holders who wish to exercise their right of revocation with respect to a Consent must give a properly transmitted “Requested Message” through ATOP, which must be received by the Tabulation Agent through ATOP, prior to the Consent Effective Date. See “The Consent Solicitation—Record Date” and “The Consent Solicitation—Revocation of Consents.”

Appraisal Rights

You will not be entitled to rights of an objecting unitholder or appraisal rights under Delaware law in connection with the Proposed Amendment or this Consent Solicitation. See “The Consent Solicitation—No Appraisal Rights.”

3


NYSE Listing of ET Units

It is a condition to the closing of the merger that the ET Common Units (as defined below) and new ET Preferred Units to be issued in the merger to Preferred Holders be approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of and to vote at,issuance. Although the Annual Meeting. Onmerger agreement requires that date, we had 105,354,037 common units outstanding and 71,257,445preferred units outstanding and entitled to vote. Each common unit is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each other itemnew ET Preferred Units issued in connection with the merger be listed on the NYSE, there can be no assurance that such new ET Preferred Units will continue to be voted on atlisted in the Annual Meeting. Each preferred unitholder is entitledfuture.

Additional Information

Requests for assistance in submitting the Consent, or for additional copies of this Consent Solicitation Statement, should be directed to vote on a 1-for-10 as converted basis with every ten preferred units entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each other item to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. A majorityInformation Agent. Similarly, questions concerning the terms of the aggregate outstanding UnitsConsent Solicitation should be directed to the Information Agent. The Information and Tabulation Agent’s contact information appears on the back cover of this Consent Solicitation Statement. The Information and Tabulation Agent makes no recommendation as to whether Preferred Holders should deliver Consents in response to the Consent Solicitation.

4


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE CONSENT SOLICITATION

The following are some questions regarding the Consent Solicitation that you may have as a Preferred Holder and the answers to those questions. We urge you to read carefully the entire Consent Solicitation Statement, including the section entitled to vote, present or represented by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker nonvotes will be included in determining the presence of a quorum for the Annual Meeting.

Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

We are furnishing proxy materials to some of our unitholders via the Internet by mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, instead of mailing or e-mailing copies of those materials. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials directs unitholders to a website where they can access our proxy materials, including our Proxy Statement“Risk Factors” and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 and view instructions on how to vote viaany subsequent quarterly or current reports filed with the Internet, mobile device, or by telephone. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and would prefer to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions includedSEC. Additional important information is contained in the Noticeremainder of Internet Availabilitythis Consent Solicitation.

What is the purpose of Proxy Materials. If you have previously electedthe Consent Solicitation?

As announced on August 16, 2023, the Partnership entered into a definitive merger agreement with Energy Transfer pursuant to receive our proxy materials via e-mail, youwhich Energy Transfer will continue to receive access to those materials electronically unless you elect otherwise.

We encourage you to register to receive all future unitholder communications electronically, insteadacquire the Partnership. In connection with the merger, at the direction of in print. This means that accessEnergy Transfer pursuant to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Proxy Statement,merger agreement, we are soliciting consents from Preferred Holders to approve the Proposed Amendment. The Proposed Amendment would, among other things, (i) permit us to increase the redemption price payable to Preferred Holders that make a cash redemption election in connection with the merger, (ii) eliminate the application of a Deficiency Rate with respect to distributions payable to the Preferred Holders during any quarter in which distributions are accrued and unpaid; (iii) modify the right of Preferred Holders to participate in special distributions made to holders of Common Units; and (iv) conform the voting rights of Preferred Holders to the voting rights of holders of Energy Transfer’s other correspondenceoutstanding series of preferred units. The purpose of the Consent Solicitation is to (i) increase the cash redemption price for the Preferred Units in connection with a cash redemption election in the merger, and (ii) conform certain terms of the Preferred Units with Energy Transfer’s other outstanding series of preferred units in order to simplify Energy Transfer’s capital structure following the merger.

If the Requisite Consents are obtained and the merger is completed, what will be deliveredPreferred Holders receive for their Preferred Units in the merger?

If the merger is completed, each Preferred Unit outstanding immediately prior to you via e-mail.

Proxy Voting

Units that are properly voted via the Internet, mobile device, or by telephone or for which proxy cards are properly executed and returnedeffective time of the merger will, be voted at the Annual Meetingelection of the Preferred Holder, in accordance with the directions givenPartnership Agreement, either (i) convert into Common Units at the then-applicable Conversion Ratio, subject to the payment of any accrued but unpaid distributions prior to the effective time of the merger, (ii) convert into a new Energy Transfer security that has substantially similar terms, including with respect to economics and structural protections, as the Preferred Units, as such Preferred Unit terms may be amended if the Requisite Consents are obtained in connection with this Consent Solicitation or (iii) be redeemed in exchange for cash or Common Units, at the absencesole discretion of directions,the Managing General Partner, at a price of (x) $9.218573 per Preferred Unit or (y) if the Requisite Consents are obtained in this Consent Solicitation, $9.857484 per Preferred Unit, in each case, plus accrued and unpaid distributions to the date of such redemption. If no election is made by a holder of Preferred Units, such holder will be voted in accordance withdeemed to have elected to receive new ET Preferred Units. The Partnership has agreed to cause the Board’s recommendations as follows: “FOR” the election of each of the nomineesManaging General Partner to the Board named herein; “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of our independent auditors; “FOR” approval, on

LOGO1


Annual Meeting Information

an advisory basis, of our executive compensationelect to pay cash for any Preferred Units whose holders have elected to have such Preferred Units redeemed as described in this proxy statement and “FORclause (iii) above. Preferred Unitholders that receive Common Units of the amendmentPartnership pursuant to our 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Itthe foregoing clause (i) will be entitled to receive 2.07 common units of Energy Transfer (the “ET Common Units”), each representing a limited partner interest in Energy Transfer, in exchange for each such Common Unit of the Partnership at the effective time of the merger. We will announce the results of the consent solicitation as promptly as possible following the Expiration Date, which announcement is anticipated to be at least 10 days before the deadline to make a merger consideration election for your Preferred Units, assuming the Expiration Date is not expected that anyextended. For additional matters will be brought before the Annual Meeting, but if other matters are properly presented, the persons named as proxies in the proxy card or their substitutes will vote in their discretion on such matters.

Voting via the Internet, mobile device, or by telephone helps save money by reducing postage and proxy tabulation costs. To vote by any of these methods, read this proxy statement, have your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, proxy card, or voting instruction form in hand, and follow the instructions below for your preferred method of voting. Each of these voting methods is available 24 hours per day, seven days per week.

We encourage you to cast your vote by one of the following methods:

   LOGO

   LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET

Units Held of Record:

www.proxypush.com/CEQP

VOTE BY TELEPHONE

Units Held of Record:

866-318-2454

Units Held in Street Name:

See Notice of Internet Availability or Voting Instruction Form

Units Held in Street Name:

See Voting Instruction Form

The way your Units may be voted depends on how your Units are held. If you own Units of record, meaning that your Units are represented by certificates or book entries in your name so that you appear as a unitholder on the records of American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, our transfer agent, you may vote by proxy, meaning you authorize individuals named in the proxy card to vote your Units. You may provide this authorization by voting via the Internet, mobile device, by telephone, or (if you have received paper copies of our proxy materials) by returning a proxy card. You also may participate in and vote during the Annual Meeting. If you own Units of record and you do not vote by proxy or at the Annual Meeting, your Units will not be voted.

If you own Units in street name, meaning that your Units are held by a bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee, you may instruct that institutioninformation on how to vote your shares. You may provide these instructions by voting viamake an election regarding the Internet, mobile device, by telephone, or (if you haveconsideration to be received paper copies of proxy materials through your bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee) by returning a voting instruction form received from that institution. You also may participate in and vote during the Annual Meeting. If you own Units in street name and do not either provide voting instructions or vote duringmerger, please see the Annual Meeting, the institution that holds your Units cannot vote your Units at the Annual Meeting.definitive Merger Proxy Statement.

Voting Standard

A nominee for director shall be elected to the Board by a plurality of the votes cast, in person or by proxy, by the holders of outstanding Units, voting as a single class. The conversion ratio of preferred units to common unitsWhat consent threshold is currently 10-to-1, but may be adjusted to account for unpaid distributions on such preferred units as needed. Abstentions and broker nonvotes will have no effect on the outcome of the election. Broker non-votes occur when a person holding Units in street name, such as through a brokerage firm, does not provide instructions as to how to vote those common units and the broker does not then vote those Units on the unitholder’s behalf.

For all other matters proposed for a vote at the Annual Meeting, the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding Units present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter is

2

LOGO


Annual Meeting Information

required to approve the matter. Proposed Amendment?

For these matters, abstentions arethe Proposed Amendment to be approved, Consents must be received by the Tabulation Agent through ATOP at or prior to the Expiration Date (and not counted as affirmative votes on a matter but are counted as presentrevoked) from holders of at least two-thirds of the issued and entitled to vote, and broker nonvotes, if any,outstanding Preferred Units.

5


If the Proposed Amendment is approved, when will have no effect on the outcome of these matters.

RevocationProposed Amendment become effective?

If you own Units of record, you may revoke your proxythe Requisite Consents are received by the Tabulation Agent through ATOP (and not revoked) at or change your voting instructions at any time before your Units are voted at the Annual Meeting by deliveringprior to the Expiration Date and the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, the Managing General Partner will execute a written noticeFirst Amendment to the Partnership Agreement, which will contain the Proposed Amendment. The Proposed Amendment will become effective immediately upon execution of revocationthe First Amendment by the Managing General Partner, which is anticipated to be immediately prior to the closing of the merger.

If I do not approve the Proposed Amendment, but the Proposed Amendment is approved by the requisite number of Preferred Units, how will my Preferred Units be affected?

If the Requisite Consents are received by the Tabulation Agent through ATOP (and not revoked) at or a dulyprior to the Expiration Date, the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, and the First Amendment is executed proxy (viaby the Internet, mobile device, or telephone or by returning a proxy card) bearing a later date or by participating in and voting during the Annual Meeting. A unitholder owning Units in street name may revoke or change voting instructions by contacting the bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee holding the Units or by participating in and voting during the Annual Meeting.

Participating in the Annual Meeting

This year’s Annual Meeting will be accessible through the Internet. We are conducting a virtual online Annual Meeting so our unitholders can participate from any geographic location with Internet connectivity. We believe this enhances accessibility to our Annual Meeting for all of our unitholders and employees.

You are entitled to participate in the Annual MeetingManaging General Partner, even if you weredo not approve the Proposed Amendment by submitting a unitholder asConsent, you will still be subject to and bound by the First Amendment until the closing of the close of business on March 15, 2023, the record date, or hold a valid proxy for the meeting. To participate in the Annual Meeting, including to vote and to view the list of registered unitholders as of the record date during the meeting, unitholders of record must access the meeting websitemerger, at www.proxydocs.com/CEQP and enter the control number found on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on the proxy card provided to you with this Proxy Statement, or that is set forth within the body of the email sent to you with the link to this Proxy Statement. If your Units are held in street name and your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or voting instruction form indicates that you may vote those common units through the www.proxypush.com/CEQP website, then you may access, participate in, and vote at the Annual Meeting with the control number indicated on that Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or voting instruction form. Otherwise, unitholders who hold their Units in street name should contact their bank, broker, or other nominee (preferably at least five days before the Annual Meeting) and obtain a “legal proxy” to be able to attend, participate in, or vote at the Annual Meeting.

Regardless of whether you plan to participate in the Annual Meeting, it is important that your Units be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, we encourage you to vote in advance of the Annual Meeting.

Unitholders are able to submit questions for the Annual Meeting’s question and answer session during the meeting. Unitholders who have been provided or obtained a control number may submit a question in advance of the meeting at www.proxydocs.com/CEQP after logging in with that control number. We also will post a replay of the Annual Meeting on our investor relations website, which will be available following the meeting. Additional information regarding the rules and procedures for participating in the Annual Meeting (including any adjournment thereof) will be set forth in our meeting rules of conduct, which unitholders can view during the meeting. The meeting rules, procedures and code of conduct will be posted 15 minutes before the meeting start.

We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting before it begins. Online check-in will be available at 1:45pm CT,approximately 15 minutes before the meeting starts on May 11, 2023. If you have difficulty accessing the meeting, please call the technical support number that will be posted in your instructional emailtime you will receive after registering to attend the Annual Meeting. We willconsideration you have technicians available to assist you.

LOGO3


Proposal 1 — Election of Class II Directors

Board and Governance Structure

General Overview and Board Makeup

The Board currently has nine members, including the CEO, who currently serves as Chairman of the Board. The Board is divided into three staggered classes, as set forth below. At each annual meeting, only the eligible directors of a class whose term is expiring will be up for election and, upon election, the elected directors in that class will serve for a term of three years, subject to a director’s earlier resignation, death or removal. If a director is elected to the Board to fill a vacancy, that director will have the same remaining term as his or her predecessor.

Our governing documents require that at least a majority of directors must meet the independence requirements of the national securities exchange on which the securities of the Partnership are listed (currently New York Stock Exchange or NYSE).

Class II Directors Standing for Election at the 2023 Annual Meeting

The Board has currently fixed the number of directors constituting the Board at nine. The Board, based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, proposed that the following three nominees be elected at the Annual Meeting, each of whom will hold office until the 2026 annual meeting of unitholders or until his or her successor shall have been elected and qualified:

David Lumpkins

Frances M. Vallejo

Gary D. Reaves

Gary Reaves was appointedreceive pursuant to the Boardmerger agreement (or default consideration if no election is made). See “If the Requisite Consents are obtained and the merger is completed, what will Preferred Holders receive for their Preferred Units in the merger?”

How do I deliver my consent to the Proposed Amendment?

Preferred Holders who wish to consent to the Proposed Amendment must deliver their properly submitted Consent in accordance DTC’s ATOP procedures so that it is received by the Tabulation Agent on September 15, 2022, pursuantor before the Expiration Date. Do not, for any reason, deliver your Preferred Units to a Director Nomination and Voting Support Agreement betweenus, the Company and FR XIII Crestwood Permian Basin Holding LLC, a subsidiary of First Reserve (“First Reserve”). The Director Nomination and Voting Support Agreement grants First Reserve certain designation rights pursuant to which First Reserve may cause the Board to nominate a designee selected by First Reserve, subject to ongoing ownership thresholds.

Each of the nominees is currently a director of theManaging General Partner, and has been elected to hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting or until his or her successor has been elected and qualified. Mr. Lumpkins was appointed to the Board in 2015 and Ms. Vallejo was appointed to the Board in 2021. Both Mr. Lumpkins and Ms. Vallejo were classified as Class II directors on August, 20, 2021. Mr. Reaves was appointed to the Board in 2022 and classified as a Class II director on November 10, 2022. Biographical and related information on each nominee is set forth below.

The Board expects that the three nominees will be available to serve as directors. However, if any of them should be unwilling or unable to serve, the Board may nominate and elect substitute nominees, and the proxies will be voted in favor of any such substitute nominees.

LOGO

The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR"

                        each nominee.

4LOGO


  Board of Directors Information

In evaluating the nominees for the Board of Directors, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee took into account the qualities they seek for directors, and the directors’ individual qualifications, skills, and background that enable the directors to effectively and productively contribute to the Board’s oversight of the Partnership, as discussed below in each biography and under “Director Nominee Tenure, Skills, and Characteristics.” When evaluating re-nomination of existing directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee also considers the nominees’ past and ongoing effectiveness on the Board and their independence.

Director Biographical Information

Directors Standing for Election at the 2023 Annual Meeting

LOGO

David Lumpkins

Biography

David Lumpkins was appointed to the Board in November 2015

Mr. Lumpkins is currently the President of DKLF, L.P., a private investment partnership. He previously served as the Chairman of PetroLogistics II, LLC, a petrochemical development company. He was the co-founder and Executive Chairman of PetroLogistics, a NYSE listed company which was acquired by Flint Hills Resources in July 2014. Mr. Lumpkins was also previously the co-founder and Chairman of PL Midstream, a pipeline transportation and storage company based in Louisiana, which was sold to Boardwalk Partners in 2012. Prior to the formation of these companies, Mr. Lumpkins worked in the investment banking industry for 17 years, principally for Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse. In 1995, Mr. Lumpkins opened Morgan Stanley’s Houston office and served as head of the firm’s southwest region. Mr. Lumpkins previously served as a director of Westlake Chemical Partners LP and Crestwood Midstream GP LLC.

Mr. Lumpkins received his undergraduate degree and MBA from the University of Texas.

Independent

Joined the Board 2015

Age 68

Committees:

Audit

Finance (Chair)

LOGO5


   Board of Directors Information

LOGO

Frances M. Vallejo

Biography

Frances Vallejo was appointed to the Board in February 2021

Ms. Vallejo currently serves on the Board of Directors of Coterra Energy Inc., which she joined following her tenure on the Board of Directors of Cimarex Energy Co., which began in 2017. At Coterra she is a member of the Audit Committee and Co-chair of the Governance and Social Responsibility Committee. She is a former executive officer of ConocoPhillips where she began her career in 1987. She served as Vice President Corporate Planning and Development from April 2015 until December 2016 and as Vice President and Treasurer from October 2008 until March 2015. Prior to October 2008, she served as General Manager Corporate Planning and Budgets, Vice President Upstream Planning and Portfolio Management, Assistant Treasurer, Manager Strategic Transactions, and in other geophysical, commercial, and finance roles. Ms. Vallejo was a member of the Board of Trustees of Colorado School of Mines from 2010 until 2016 and is currently a member of the Colorado School of Mines Foundation Board of Governors.

Ms. Vallejo holds a Bachelor of Science in mineral engineering mathematics from Colorado School of Mines and a Master of Business Administration from Rice University, where she was named a Jones Scholar.

Independent

Joined the Board 2021

Age 57

Committees:

Audit

Compensation

Sustainability

LOGO

Gary D. Reaves

Biography

Gary Reaves was appointed to the Board in September 2022

Mr. Reaves is currently a Managing Director at First Reserve, which he joined in 2006. Mr. Reaves’ responsibilities include investment origination, execution, and exit, focusing on midstream assets and the equipment, manufacturing and services sectors. Prior to joining First Reserve, he was an Analyst in the Global Energy Group at UBS Investment Bank. He also spent time as an Analyst in Financial Advisory Services for Howard Frazier Barker Elliott, Inc.

Mr. Reaves holds a B.B.A. from the University of Texas.

Independent

Joined the Board 2022

Age 43

Committee:

Finance

6LOGO


Board of Directors Information   

Other Directors Not Standing for Election at the 2023 Annual Meeting

Class III Directors (term expires by 2024 annual meeting of unitholders)

LOGO

Robert G. Phillips

Biography

Robert G. Phillips has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of our general partner since June 2013, and, until January 2022, also served as President

Mr. Phillips served as Chairman, President and CEO of, the Partnership’s predecessor, from November 2007 until October 2013. Previously, Mr. Phillips served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. from February 2005 until June 2007 and Chief Operating Officer and a Director of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. from September 2004 until February 2005. Mr. Phillips also served on the Board of Directors of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P., the general partner of Enterprise Products Partners L.P., from February 2006 until April 2007. He previously served as Chairman of the Board and CEO of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. (GTM) from 1999 to 2004 prior to GTM’s merger with Enterprise Product Partners, LP, and held senior executive management positions with El Paso Corporation, including President of El Paso Field Services from 1996 to 2004. Prior to that he was Chairman, President and CEO of Eastex Energy, Inc. from 1981 to 1995. Mr. Phillips previously served as a Director of Pride International, Inc. from October 2007 to May 31, 2011, one of the world’s largest offshore drilling contractors, and was a member of its Audit Committee. Mr. Phillips served as a Director of Bonavista Energy Corporation, a Canadian independent oil and gas producer, from May 2015 to March 2020. In 2021, Mr. Phillips was appointed to the National Petroleum Council which advises the United States Department of Energy on oil and gas related matters.

Mr. Phillips holds a B.B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin and a Juris Doctor degree from South Texas College of Law.

Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Not Independent

Joined the board 2010

Age 68

LOGO7


   Board of Directors Information

LOGO

Angela A. Minas

Biography

Angela A. Minas was appointed to the Board in January 2022

Ms. Minas currently serves on the Board of Directors of Vallourec S.A., a world leader in premium tubular solutions, where she serves as the Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Corporate and Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee. Ms. Minas has previously served on the boards of Westlake Chemical Partners, CNX Midstream Partners, Weatherford International, and Ciner Resources LP. She served as Chair of the Audit Committee for CNX Midstream and Ciner Resources. In March 2023, the Board of Directors of Woodside Energy Group Ltd., a global energy company founded in Australia, recommended Ms. Minas for appointment as a director at Woodside’s 2023 Annual General Meeting. If elected, she will join the Woodside board as a member of the Audit & Risk, the Sustainability and the Nominations & Governance Committees. During her career, Ms. Minas was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of DCP Midstream and Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer for Constellation Energy Partners.

Ms. Minas holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Master of Business Administration from Rice University where she currently serves as a member of the Board of Advisors of the Rice University Graduate Business School.

Independent

Joined the board 2022

Age 59

Committees:

Audit (Chair)

Compensation

LOGO

Clay C. Williams

Biography

Clay C. Williams was appointed to the Board in January 2022

Mr. Williams currently serves as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of NOV Inc., a multinational oilfield services company with more than 25,000 employees across 61 countries that is a provider of expert solutions, equipment and operational support for the drilling and production industries. Mr. Williams brings a unique perspective with more than 35 years of global energy industry experience to the Crestwood board, having served as NOV’s Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer and in numerous financial roles with Varco before its merger with National Oilwell in 2005. From 2009 to 2019, Mr. Williams served on the board of Benchmark Electronics.

Mr. Williams holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil & Geological Engineering from Princeton University and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Texas.

Independent

Joined the board 2022

Age 60

Committees:

Compensation (Chair)

Nominating & Governance

8LOGO


Board of Directors Information   

Class I Directors (terms expire by 2025 annual meeting of unitholders)

LOGO

Warren H. Gfeller

Biography

Warren H. Gfeller was appointed to the Board in July 2001

He currently serves at the lead independent director and Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. He previously served as Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Finance Committee.

Mr. Gfeller has served as a director of INNOVATE Corp. since June 2016, where he served as non-executive Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Audit Committee. He has engaged in private investments since 1991. From 1984 to 1991, Mr. Gfeller served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Ferrellgas, Inc., a retail and wholesale marketer of propane and other natural gas liquids. Mr. Gfeller began his career with Ferrellgas in 1983 as an Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Ferrellgas, Mr. Gfeller was the Chief Financial Officer of Energy Sources, Inc. and a CPA at Arthur Young & Co. He has served as the Commissioner of the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks since 2019 and has been appointed by the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture to the U.S. Agricultural Trade Advisory Committee (ATAC) for a four-year term beginning January 2021. Mr. Gfeller has previously served in various board capacities including Chairman of the Board, Lead Director, Chairman of Audit and Compensation Committees for several public and private companies engaged in a variety of industries.

Mr. Gfeller received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Kansas State University.

Lead Independent

Joined the board 2001

Age 70

Committee:

Nominating &

Governance (Chair)

LOGO9


   Board of Directors Information

LOGO

Janeen S. Judah

Biography

Janeen Judah was appointed to the Board in November 2018

Ms. Judah has served as a director of Patterson-UTI since April 2018. Ms. Judah has also served as a director for privately held Aethon Energy III, LLC since June 2019, and as a member of the University Lands Advisory Board since August 2020. Ms. Judah served as a director of Jagged Peak Energy Inc. from April 2019 to January 2020, when Jagged Peak was acquired by Parsley Energy. Ms. Judah served as the President of the Society of Petroleum Engineers from September 2016 to October 2017 while on secondment from Chevron, and as a member of the Board of Directors of the Society of Petroleum Engineers from 2003 to 2006 and from 2012 to 2018. Ms. Judah held numerous leadership positions at Chevron, including general manager for Chevron’s Southern Africa business unit from August 2010 to September 2016, president of Chevron Environmental Management Company from August 2007 to August 2010 and general manager of reservoir and production engineering for Chevron Energy Technology Company from June 2004 to August 2007. Before joining Chevron in 1998, she held various upstream petroleum engineering positions for Texaco and Arco, starting in Midland in 1981.

Ms. Judah holds Bachelor of Science and Masters of Science degrees in petroleum engineering from Texas A&M University, a Masters of Business Administration from the University of Texas of the Permian Basin and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Houston Law Center.

Independent

Joined the Board 2018

Age 63

Committees:

Sustainability (Chair)

Nominating &

Governance

LOGO

John J. Sherman

Biography

John J. Sherman was appointed to the Board in July 2001

Mr. Sherman is the former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Inergy Holdings GP, LLC, Inergy, L.P. and Inergy Midstream, L.P., and served in those positions until 2013. He is currently the Chairman and CEO of the Kansas City Royals Baseball Club and previously served as the Vice Chairman of the Cleveland Guardians Baseball Club. Prior to joining our predecessor, he was a Vice President with Dynegy Inc. from 1996 through 1997. From 1991 through 1996, Mr. Sherman was the president of LPG Services Group, Inc., a company he co-founded and grew to become one of the nation’s largest wholesale marketers of propane before Dynegy acquired LPG Services in 1996. From 1984 through 1991, Mr. Sherman was a Vice President and member of the management committee of Ferrellgas. Mr. Sherman previously served on the board for Evergy and currently serves on the board for Tech Accel LLC.

Mr. Sherman is a graduate of Ottawa University.

Independent

Joined the Board 2001

Age 67

Committees:

Finance

Sustainability

10LOGO


Board of Directors Information

Board Skills & Diversity

LOGO

LOGO11


Board of Directors Information

Director Nominee Tenure, Skills, and Characteristics

In 2021, we established a Nominating and Governance Committee, which meets at least quarterly and reviews the performance, and contributions of existing Board members to the extent they are candidates for re-election and considers all aspects of each candidate’s qualifications and skills in the context of the Partnership’s needs at that point in time. The Nominating and Governance Committee includes, and has any search firm that it engages include, women and individuals from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups in the pool from which the Committee selects director candidates. When considering candidates as potential Board members, the Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate the candidates’ ability to contribute to such diversity. The Board assesses its effectiveness in this regard as part of its Board and director evaluation process. Currently, of our three director nominees, one is a woman, all are independent, and two have served for five years or less. The Board’s composition also represents a balanced approach to director tenure, allowing the Board to benefit from the experience of longer-serving directors combined with fresh perspectives from newer directors. The tenure range of our Board is as follows:

Tenure on Board

Number of Directors

More than 10 years

2

3-10 years

3

2 years or less

4

Among the qualifications and skills of a candidate considered important by the Nominating and Governance Committee are:

  Energy Industry Experience

  ESG/Sustainability

  Financial/Audit & Risk

  Technical/Engineering

  Government Relations/Public Policy

  Health, Safety, Environmental (HSE)

  Senior Executive (C-Suite) Experience

  Cybersecurity/IT

  M&A/Capital Markets

Corporate Governance

Board Leadership

The Board is responsible for the control and direction of the Partnership. The Board represents the unitholders and its primary purpose is to build long-term unitholder value. The Board has no policy that requires that the positions of the Chairman of the Board (the Chairman) and the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) be separate or that they be held by the same individual. The Board believes that this determination should be based on circumstances existing from time to time, including the composition, skills and experience of the Board and its members, specific challenges faced by us or the industry in which it operates,Information and governance efficiency.

The Chair of the Board is selected by the BoardTabulation Agent, and currently is our Founder and CEO, Robert G. Phillips. The Board believes that this leadership structure is appropriate given Mr. Phillips’ role in founding the Partnership and his significant ownership stake. The Board believes that this leadership structure improves the Board’s ability to focus on key policy and operational issues and helps the Partnership operate in the long-term interests of unitholders.

In addition, the independent directors on the Board have appointed a Lead Director from the Board’s independent directors, currently Warren Gfeller, in order to promote independent leadership of the Board. The lead director presides over the executive sessions of the independent directors (which occur at least once a year), chairs Board meetings in the Chair’s absence, works with management and the independent directors to approve agendas, schedules, information, and

12LOGO


Board of Directors Information

materials for Board meetings, and is available to engage directly with major shareholders where appropriate. In addition, the lead director confers with the Chair of the Board and the independent directors and reviews, as appropriate, the annual schedule of regular Board meetings and major Board meeting agenda topics. The guidance and direction provided by the Lead Director reinforce the Board’s independent oversight of management and contribute to communication among members of the Board.

Director Independence

Because we are a limited partnership, the listing standards of the NYSE do not require that we have a majority of independent directors ondeliver the Board, nor that the Partnership establish or maintain a Nominating and Governance Committee or Compensation Committee of the Board. We are, however, requiredConsent to have an Audit Committee consisting of at least three members, all of whom are required to be independent as defined by the NYSE. The Board has determined that, Warren Gfeller, Janeen Judah, David Lumpkins, Angela Minas, Gary Reaves, John Sherman, Frances Vallejo, and Clay Williams qualify as independent pursuant to independence standards established by the NYSE as set forth in Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. To be considered an independent director under the NYSE listing standards, the Board must affirmatively determine that a director has no material relationship with usany person other than as a director. In making this determination,specified in DTC’s ATOP procedures. See “The Consent Solicitation — How to Consent.”

When will the Board adheresConsent Fee be paid?

If the Requisite Consents are received by the Tabulation Agent through ATOP (and not revoked) at or prior to the Expiration Date and the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, then the Partnership will, as promptly as practicable after, and only if, the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, pay to the Consenting Holders the Consent Fee for each Preferred Unit with respect to which consents are received (and not revoked) on or prior to the Expiration Date. No Consent Fee will be paid with respect to any Preferred Units for which no Consent is delivered on or prior to the Expiration Date, even though the Proposed Amendment, if approved, will bind all holders of such Preferred Units and their transferees upon the effectiveness of the specific tests for independence included inProposed Amendment.

What are the NYSE listing standards and considers all other facts and circumstances it deems necessary or advisable.

A director need not be a memberexpected U.S. federal income tax consequences to Preferred Holders upon the receipt of the General Partner or a Limited Partner; however, a majority of the Directors comprising the Board of Directors must meet the independence standards required of directors who serve on a board of directors established by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) thereunder and by the National Securities Exchange on which the common units are listed or admitted to trading (or if no such National Securities Exchange, the NYSE).

Risk OversightConsent Fee?

The Partnership facesintends to report the Consent Fee as ordinary income paid to Preferred Holders as consideration for their Consents. See “Expected U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Preferred Holders upon Receipt of the Consent Fee.”

For a numberdescription of risks, including environmentalthe material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger, see the section titled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” in the definitive Merger Proxy Statement.

6


THE PARTNERSHIP

The Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership formed in March 2001, is a master limited partnership that develops, acquires, owns or controls, and regulatory risks,operates primarily fee-based assets and others, such asoperations within the impactenergy midstream sector. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, we provide broad-ranging infrastructure solutions across the value chain to service premier liquids-rich natural gas and crude oil shale plays across the United States. We own and operate a diversified portfolio of competition. Management is responsible fornatural gas liquids, crude oil, natural gas, and produced water gathering, processing, storage, disposal, and transportation assets that connect fundamental energy supply with energy demand across North America. Our Common Units are listed on the day-to-day management of risksNYSE under the Partnership faces, whilesymbol “CEQP” and our Preferred Units are listed on the Board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility forNYSE under the oversight of risk management. In fulfilling its risk oversight role, the Board must determine whether risk management processes designed and implemented by our management are adequate and functioning as designed. Senior management regularly delivers presentations to the Board on strategic matters, operations, risk management and other matters, and is available to address any questions or concerns raised by the Board.symbol “CEQP-P.”

Our board committees assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in certain areas of risk. The Audit Committee assists with risk management oversight including in the areas of financial reporting, internal controls and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and our risk management policy related to our commodity price risk management activities. The Compensation Committee assists the Board with risk management related to our compensation policies and programs. The Sustainability Committee assists the Board on matters relating to sustainability, which include environmental risks and opportunities, social responsibility and impacts, employee, contractor and community health and safety, and activities related to stakeholder engagement and community investment. The Finance Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities across the principal areas of corporate finance and financial risk management. The Nominating and Governance Committee assists the Board on matters related to the evaluation of the Board and its standing committees, succession planning of the CEO and key executive officers and oversight responsibilities regarding the governance of the Partnership.

LOGO13


Board of Directors Information

Oversight of Cybersecurity Risk

As with any key operational risk, the Company has a robust governance structure around cybersecurity. Our programoffice is governed at the Board level through the Audit Committee where our Senior Vice President of Internal Audit, Technology and Implementation Services provides quarterly updates to the committee and executive management. Internally, a Cybersecurity Steering Committee, which is represented by a cross-section of leaders, meets on a frequent basis and is responsible for developing the Company’s cybersecurity goals and objectives, reviewing the results of penetration testing and drills, and monitoring current trends and threats. Our framework extends to all stakeholders at the Company where our goal is to protect privacy, equipment and sensitive information in both the corporate network and throughout our field operations.

Risk Assessment in Compensation Programs

During the year our Compensation Committee conducted an analysis of potential risks posed by the Company’s compensation program, asking, in essence, whether the program might encourage the executive officers to take unnecessary or excessive risks, or whether the program might encourage the manipulation of reported earnings. As part of its analysis, the Compensation Committee also considered mitigating factors and controls. Based on its analysis, the Compensation Committee determined that our compensation program is unlikely to motivate inappropriate risk-taking.

ComponentPotential RiskMitigating Factors
Base Salary

  Unsustainable fixed expenses

  Retention challenges if too low

  Management of expenses and increases

  Periodic market surveys

Annual Incentive Plan

  Imprudent risk taking to maximize short-term reported financial results

  Earnings manipulation

  Internal financial controls

  Award limits

  Long-term incentive awards at risk

  Unit ownership guidelines

  Independent audit

Long-Term,

Equity-Based

Incentive Plans

  Imprudent risk taking to maximize short-term reported financial results

  Earnings manipulation

  Award limits

  Unit ownership guidelines

  Long vesting periods

  Internal financial controls

  Independent audit

Health & Insurance Benefits

  Unsustainable fixed expenses

  Retention challenges if too low

  Management of expenses

  Periodic market surveys

Retirement

Benefits

  Unsustainable fixed expenses

  Retention challenges if too low

  Legal compliance risks

  Management of expenses

  Limited nonqualified retirement benefits

  Third-party professional advisors

  Periodic market surveys

  Independent audit

Severance Plans

  Unsustainable fixed expenses

  Limitations within employment agreements

  Award limits

Perquisites

  Unsustainable fixed expenses

  Retention challenges if too low

  Management of expenses

  Periodic market surveys

Board Evaluation

On an annual basis we conduct a comprehensive Board self-evaluation to assess the effectiveness of our Board, committees, and members. The Board conducts annual evaluations through the use of both individual interviews by the Lead Director with each Board member and a written questionnaire completed by all Board members that covers a broad range of matters relating to governance, meetings, materials, and other agenda topics.

14LOGO


Board of Directors Information

The Board and senior executives then review and discuss the evaluation results and any actions to be taken. The results are used to inform Board and committee composition and refreshment, including potential expansion and refinement of the attributes and experience criteria for Board membership, and to address the evolving needs of the Company. The evaluation aims (1) to find opportunities where the Board and committees can improve their performance and effectiveness, (2) to assess any need to evolve the composition and expertise of the Board, and (3) to assure that our Board and committees are operating in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters and best practices.

Code of Ethics

Crestwood is committed to running an ethical business, which is supported by our clearly articulated policies and rigorous management systems and processes. We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that outlines our guiding principles and expectations, which can be found at www.crestwoodlp.com/investors/governance.

Each officer, director and employee is responsible for upholding our standards for ethics and integrity as set forth in the Code. Every two years all directors and employees are required to complete ethics training on our Code.

Any employee witnessing a violation of the Code is asked to report their concern through our independent Ethics Hotline, which is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. All employees receive regular communication about the hotline to ensure that everyone knows their reporting options and understands Crestwood’s commitment to ethics and integrity. Our compliance team takes all concerns seriously and follows the necessary protocols and processes to quickly resolve them. We maintain absolute anonymity, to the extent possible, and empower any employee reporting a violation to discuss their concern without fear of retaliation.

We track the number of requests made and the length of time from reporting to resolution to evaluate the success of the hotline. Any ethics violations and results of the whistleblower hotline are reported to the Audit Committee by our Chief Compliance Officer, who also shares quarterly general ethics updates with the Board.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted a robust set of Corporate Governance Guidelines that addresses the goals and expectations with respect to key corporate governance matters. The Guidelines address the following topics:

Director Qualifications

Director Responsibilities

Lead Director Responsibilities

Director Access to Officers, Employees and Other Advisors

Director Orientation and Continuing Education

Director Common Unit Ownership Guidelines

Directors who are not also executive officers of the Company are required to hold common units with a value equal to five times the amount of the annual retainer paid to directors. Until such guideline is met, a director is required to retain 100% of all vested equity awards under the Company’s director compensation program.

LOGO15


Board of Directors Information

Communications with Directors

Parties wishing to send written communications to the Board, other than sales-related communications, should send a letter addressed to the member or members of the Board to whom the communication is directed, care of the Corporate Secretary, 811 Main St., Suite 3400, Houston, Texas 77002. All such communications will be forwarded to the Board member or members specified.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

The Company does not have a formal policy with respect to director attendance at annual unitholder meetings. In 2022, all members of the Board were in attendance at the annual meeting.

Please visit our investor relations website at www.crestwoodlp.com/investors, “Governance,” for additional information on our corporate governance.

Board Meetings and Committees

The Board meets in regularly scheduled sessions and holds special meetings and acts by unanimous written consent whenever circumstances require such meetings. Our independent directors meet in executive session at least once a year. During 2022, there were 13 total meetings of the Board. All incumbent directors attended at least 97% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and committees on which they served occurring during 2022.

The Board has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Finance Committee, a Nominating and Governance Committee and a Sustainability Committee, each of which is comprised entirely of directors who meet the applicable independence requirements of the NYSE rules. The committees keep the Board informed of their actions and provide assistance to the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to unitholders. The table below provides current board membership information as well as committee meeting information for the last fiscal year.

Name

 Audit
Committee
 Compensation
Committee
 Finance
Committee
 Nominating and
Governance
Committee
 Sustainability
Committee

Robert G. Phillips

     

Warren H. Gfeller

 

 

 

 

 

 

 LOGO 

 

Janeen S. Judah

    LOGO LOGO

David Lumpkins

 LOGO 

 

 

 LOGO 

 

 

 

 

 

Angela A. Minas

 LOGO LOGO   

Gary D. Reaves

   LOGO  

John J. Sherman

   LOGO  LOGO

Frances M. Vallejo

 LOGO LOGO   LOGO

Clay C. Williams

  LOGO  LOGO 

Total Meetings in 2022

 8 5 7 4 4

2022 Attendance Percentage

 100% 100% 90% 100% 100%

   LOGO   Committee Chair

16LOGO


Board of Directors Information

The functions performed by these committees, which are set forth in more detail in their charters, are summarized below.

Committee Oversight

Audit Committee
Current Members:

LOGO

Angela Minas (Chair)

David Lumpkins

Frances Vallejo

Meetings:

8 meetings with 100% attendance

Independence:

3 independent directors, 100% independent

Mandate:

  Provide oversight of the Company’s financial statements

  Monitor the integrity of our financial reporting process and internal control system

  Ensure the independence and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm

  Oversee the performance of the disclosure controls and procedures established by management, performance of the internal audit function and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements

2022 Key Achievements:

  Oversaw enhanced annual enterprise risk management process including input from committee chairs

  Received quarterly updates on our cybersecurity processes and controls

  Reviewed management’s hedging strategies for the year and quarterly updates on commodity price risk management

  Received quarterly updates on our independently managed, confidential ethics hotline

  Reviewed quarterly investment spending, including capital expenditures and acquisition performance and achievement of synergies.

Compensation Committee
Current Members:

LOGO

Clay Williams (Chair)

Angela Minas

Frances Vallejo

Meetings:

5 meetings with 100% attendance

Independence:

3 independent directors, 100% independent

Mandate:

  Review the Partnership’s goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and key executive officers and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and key executive officers

  Assist with administering the equity-based compensation plans and reviewing the compensation related disclosures in the Partnership’s annual proxy statement

2022 Key Achievements:

  Eliminated single-trigger Change of Control equity vesting

  Reviewed and approved Clawback Policy

  Revised metrics in the short-term and long-term incentive plans to minimize overlap

  Eliminated non-routine equity awards

LOGO

17


Board of Directors Information

Finance Committee
Current Members:

LOGO

David Lumpkins (Chair)

Gary Reaves

John Sherman

Meetings:

7 meetings with 90% attendance

Independence:

3 independent directors, 100% independent

Mandate:

  Provide guidance on the financial status and capital structure of the Partnership, including long range financial policies and objectives, distribution policy and actions, plans or programs for the repurchase or redemption of Partnership securities, and equity and debt issuances

  Review the Partnership’s financial strategies, policies, guidelines and procedures

  Oversee the Partnership’s compliance with its material debt instruments and credit facility in light of the Partnership’s operating strategy, risk exposures, financial policies and changes in applicable laws or accounting requirements

2022 Key Achievements:

  Developed process for acquisition “look-back” analysis

Nominating and Governance Committee
Current Members:

LOGO

Warren Gfeller (Chair)

Janeen Judah

Clay Williams

Meetings:

4 meetings with 100% attendance

Independence:

3 independent directors, 100% independent

Mandate:

  Assist the Board in identifying individuals qualified to become Board members consistent with criteria approved by the Board, selects or recommends that the Board select director nominees, oversees the set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Partnership, and oversees the evaluation of the Board

  Review the size and composition of the Board and its committees and recommend any changes to the Board for approval in its sole discretion

  Review appropriately submitted unitholder proposals and recommend responses to the Board

  Oversee the succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer and other key executives.

2022 Key Achievements:

  Onboarded three new independent directors

  Approved enhanced board skills matrix process

  Revised annual board self-assessment process to elicit better feedback

  Approved executive unit ownership guidelines

18

LOGO


Board of Directors Information   

Sustainability Committee
Current Members:

LOGO

Janeen Judah (Chair)

Frances Vallejo

John Sherman

Meetings:

4 meetings with 100% attendance

Independence:

3 independent directors, 100% independent

Mandate:

  Provide oversight of sustainability initiatives and ensure that ESG risks are incorporated into our long-term business strategy

  Oversee the development of the sustainability strategy

  Review and approve the annual sustainability report

2022 Key Achievements:

  Reviewed and approved the 2021 sustainability report

  Oversaw the enterprise risk management activities related to ESG risks including climate-related risks

  Provided oversight of the 2022-2024 sustainability strategy and carbon management plan ensuring execution of deliverables

  Received updates on the Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) strategy and progress on the DEI Five-point plan

  Monitored updates to U.S. climate change regulation and greenhouse gas legislation

Director Nominations

Pursuant to Section 13.4(b)(vi) of our Partnership Agreement, nominations of persons for election of directors to the Board may be made at an annual meeting of the Partnership (a) by or at the direction of a majority of the directors then in office or (b) by a limited partner (i.e. a unitholder) or group of limited partners (a “limited partner group”), that holds or beneficially owns, and has continuously held without interruption for the prior two years, at least 10% of the outstanding common units or outstanding preferred units that on a converted basis represent at least 10% of the outstanding common units, or any combination thereof.

Any eligible unitholders or limited partner group that wishes to submit a director nomination for the 2023 Annual Meeting must deliver written notice thereof to the General Partnerlocated at 811 Main Street, Suite 3400, Houston, Texas 77002.77002, and our telephone number is (832) 519-2200. Our website address is https://www.crestwoodlp.com. The written notice must comply with Section 13.4(b)(vi)(A)(2)information on our website is not part of our Partnership Agreementthis Consent Solicitation Statement.

7


RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described throughout this Consent Solicitation Statement, including those described below, and the proceduresrisk factors set forth in Section 13.4(b)(vi)(C)our annual and periodic reports that we file with the SEC regarding the risks of investment in our securities, before you decide whether to Consent to the Proposed Amendment. You should also read the definitive Merger Proxy Statement for risks relating to the merger.

Risks Related to the Consent Solicitation

The merger as well as the Proposed Amendment may result in reduced liquidity for Preferred Holders electing to receive new ET Preferred Units in the merger.

Although the merger agreement requires that new ET Preferred Unitsissued in connection with the merger be listed on the NYSE, there can be no assurance that such new ET Preferred Units will continue to be listed in the future. Also, if the Proposed Amendment to the Partnership Agreement includingis approved and becomes effective, more Preferred Holders may either (i) convert their Preferred Units into Common Units prior to the information requirements includedcompletion of the merger and therefore receive ET Common Units or (ii) make a cash redemption election in 13.4(b)(vi)(A)(2)connection with the consideration they elect to receive in the merger, which collectively would reduce the aggregate number of our Partnership Agreement. new ET Preferred Units that may be outstanding after the completion of the merger. As a result of any of the foregoing factors, the trading market for such new ET Preferred Units would become more limited than the existing trading market for Preferred Units or the trading market for such units if the Proposed Amendment does not become effective. In addition, after the completion of the merger, Energy Transfer could elect to conduct one or more tender offers for the new ET Preferred Units, which would have the effect of further limiting the trading market for the new ET Preferred Units. A more limited trading market might adversely affect the liquidity and market price of such securities.

The Chairman designatedProposed Amendment will reduce protections afforded to Preferred Holders electing to receive new ET Preferred Units in the merger.

If the Proposed Amendment becomes effective, the terms of the new ET Preferred Units to be received by Preferred Holders electing to receive such units as consideration in the merger will be less restrictive and will afford reduced protection to holders of such units compared to those currently in place and those applicable to the Preferred Units. The Proposed Amendment would (i) eliminate the application of a Deficiency Rate with respect to distributions payable to the Preferred Holders during any quarter in which distributions are accrued and unpaid; (ii) modify the right of Preferred Holders to participate in special distributions made to holders of Common Units; and (iii) conform the voting rights of the holders of Preferred Units to the voting rights of holders of Energy Transfer’s other outstanding series of preferred units.

We have not obtained a third-party determination concerning the fairness of the Proposed Amendment.

We have not retained, and do not intend to retain, any unaffiliated representative to act solely on behalf of the Preferred Holders for purposes of negotiating the Consent Solicitation or preparing a report concerning the fairness of the Proposed Amendment or this Consent Solicitation.

If the Requisite Consents are received on or prior to the Expiration Date, the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated and the Proposed Amendment becomes effective, all holders of the Preferred Units will be bound by the Proposed Amendment even if they did not approve the Proposed Amendment by submitting their Consent.

The Proposed Amendment is set forth in Annex A to this Consent Solicitation Statement. If the Requisite Consents are received on or prior to the Expiration Date, the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as

8


applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated and the Proposed Amendment becomes effective by execution of the First Amendment by the Managing General Partner, pursuantall holders of the Preferred Units will be bound by the Proposed Amendment even if they did not approve the Proposed Amendment by submitting their Consent.

If the Requisite Consents are received on a date that is prior to Section 13.10the Expiration Date, the Consent Solicitation may be concluded on that date and the Consent Fee will only be paid with respect to Preferred Units for which Consents were delivered on or prior to that date.

The Expiration Date is 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on October 17, 2023, unless earlier concluded, terminated or extended as provided for in this Consent Solicitation Statement. We may, at the Managing General Partner’s sole discretion, conclude the Consent Solicitation at the earlier of ourthe Expiration Date or the date on which the Tabulation Agent has received the Requisite Consents. If the Tabulation Agent receives the Requisite Consents on a date that is prior to the Expiration Date, then the Consent Solicitation may be concluded on that date and Preferred Holders would no longer be able to deliver a Consent. Such early conclusion of the Consent Solicitation would limit the right of such Preferred Holders to receive the Consent Fee, even if such Preferred Holders would otherwise have delivered Consents with respect to their Preferred Units prior to the Expiration Date.

The Consent Fee would be payable only if the Proposed Amendment becomes effective.

The Partnership Agreement shall havewill not pay a Consent Fee unless the powerProposed Amendment becomes effective by execution of the First Amendment by the Managing General Partner. As a result, even if a Preferred Holder provides its Consent on or prior to the Expiration Date and dutythe Partnership receives the Requisite Consents, if the Managing General Partner does not execute the First Amendment, no Consent Fee will be paid. This could be the case if the Merger Conditions are not satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to (a) determine whether a nomination was madethe merger agreement or if the parties otherwise terminate the merger agreement in accordance with the above proceduresterms thereof.

9


DESCRIPTION OF THE EQUITY INTERESTS IN THE PARTNERSHIP

For a complete description of the equity interests in the Partnership, you should refer to the Partnership Agreement, the Proposed Amendment as set forth in Annex A hereto, and (b) declare thatto the applicable provisions of Delaware law. For purposes of this section of this Consent Solicitation Statement, the term “Partnership Agreement” shall refer to the Partnership Agreement prior to the Effective Time, and the description of the Partnership Agreement contained in this section does not give effect to the Proposed Amendment. Upon the closing of the merger, the holders of Preferred Units electing to receive new ET Preferred Units will receive such nomination shall be disregardednew ET Preferred Units with terms reflecting the Proposed Amendment if any proposed nomination was not madethe Requisite Consents are obtained in complianceconnection with Section 13.4(b)this Consent Solicitation.

Common Units

Our Common Units represent limited partner interests in the Partnership. The holders of ourCommon Units are entitled to participate in Partnership distributions and exercise the rights or privileges available to limited partners under the Partnership Agreement.

IfNumber of Common Units

As of September 22, 2023, the Partnership had 105,096,104 Common Units outstanding, 75,537,671 of which are held by the public and 29,558,433 of which are held by affiliates of the Partnership.

Where the Common Units are Traded

The Partnership’s outstanding Common Units are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “CEQP.”

Cash Distributions

The Partnership Agreement requires that, within 45 days after the end of each quarter, the Partnership distribute all of its “Available Cash” to unitholders of record on the applicable record date.

Available cash for any quarter consists of all cash and cash equivalents of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner, Crestwood Midstream Partners LP and any subsidiary of any such entity, treated as a consolidated entity (the “Partnership Group”), on hand at the end of that quarter:

less, the amount of cash reserves that is necessary or appropriate in the reasonable discretion of the Managing General Partner to:

provide for the proper conduct of the business of the Partnership Group subsequent to such quarter;

comply with applicable law or any loan agreement, security agreement, mortgage, debt instrument or other agreement or obligation to which any member of the Partnership Group is a party, or by which it is bound or its assets are subject; or

provide funds for future distributions to limited partner group (orpartners for any one or more of the next four quarters;

plus, all additional cash and cash equivalents of the Partnership Group on hand on the date of determination of Available Cash for the quarter resulting from working capital borrowings made subsequent to the end of the quarter. Working capital borrowings are generally borrowings that are made under a qualified representative of each member) does not appear at the annual meeting to present a nomination, such nomination shall be disregarded notwithstandingcredit facility or other similar arrangement and, in all cases, are used solely for working capital purposes;

10


provided, however, that proxies in respect of such vote may have been receiveddisbursements made by the General Partner or the Partnership. To be considered a qualified representative of aany member of the Partnership Group or cash reserves established, increased or reduced after the end of such quarter but on or before the date of determination of Available Cash with respect to such quarter shall be deemed to have been made, established, increased or reduced, for purposes of determining Available Cash, within such quarter if the Managing General Partner so determines.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Available Cash does not include any cash and cash equivalents on hand derived from or attributable to our ownership of, or sale or other disposition of, the shares of common stock of IPCH Acquisition Corp. and the membership interests of Crestwood Partners, LLC.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Equiniti Trust Company, LLC (“Equiniti”) serves as the registrar and transfer agent for the Common Units. The Partnership will pay all fees charged by Equiniti for transfers of Common Units except for the following fees which must be paid by the holders of Common Units: surety bond premiums to replace lost or stolen certificates; taxes and other governmental charges; special charges for services requested by a holder of a Common Unit; and other similar fees or charges.

There is no charge to holders of Common Units for disbursements of the Partnership’s cash distributions.

Transfer of Common Units

Upon the transfer of a Common Unit in accordance with the Partnership Agreement, the transferee of the Common Unit will be admitted as a limited partner group, a person must be a duly authorized officer, manager or partner ofwith respect to the Common Units transferred when such limited partner or must be authorized by a writing executed by such limited partner or an electronic transmission delivered by such limited partner to act for such limited partner as proxy at the meeting of limited partnerstransfer and such person must produce such writing or electronic transmission, or a reliable reproduction of the writing or electronic transmission at the meeting of limited partners.

LOGO19


Board of Directors Informationadmission are reflected in our books and records. Each transferee:

 

Compensationrepresents that the transferee has the capacity, power, and authority to become bound by the Partnership Agreement;

automatically becomes bound by the terms and conditions of, Directorsand is deemed to have executed, the Partnership Agreement; and

Officers

gives the consents, waivers, and approvals contained in the Partnership Agreement.

In addition to other rights acquired upon transfer, the transferor gives the transferee the right to become a substituted limited partner in the Partnership for the transferred Common Units. A transferee will become a substituted limited partner of the Partnership for the transferred Common Units automatically upon the recording of the transfer on our books and records. Our Managing General Partner who also serve as directors, such as Mr. Phillips, do not receive additional compensation. Allwill cause any transfers to be recorded on our books and records no less frequently than quarterly.

Until a Common Unit has been transferred on our books, we and the transfer agent may treat the record holder of the non-employee directorsCommon Unit as the absolute owner for all purposes, except for Mr. Reaves receives cash compensationas otherwise required by law or stock exchange regulations.

We may, at our discretion, treat the nominee holder of $100,000 per year for serving ona Common Unit as the Board. absolute owner. In that case, the beneficial holder’s rights are limited solely to those that it has against the nominee holder as a result of any agreement between the beneficial owner and the nominee holder.

Common Units are securities, and any transfers of Common Units are subject to the laws governing the transfer of securities.

Preferred Units

The Lead Director, Audit Committee chairperson, Finance Committee chairperson, Compensation Committee chairperson, Nominating and Governance Committee chairperson and Sustainability Committee chairperson each receive additional cash compensationPreferred Units represent a separate class of $20,000 per year. In August 2022,our limited partner interests.

11


Number Outstanding

As of September 22, 2023, there were 71,257,445 Preferred Units outstanding, which are convertible, as described below, into approximately 7,125,745 Common Units, with fractional units rounded to the Compensation Committee approved additional annual compensation in the amount of $10,000 be paid to any non-employee director that serves on threenearest whole unit.

Conversion

One or more board committees. All cash compensation is paidPreferred Holders may elect, each in its own discretion, (i) to the non-employee directors in quarterly installments. Additionally, each non-employee director receives an annual grant of restricted units under our long-term incentive plan equal to approximately $110,000 in value that vests on the first anniversary of the date of issuance. Each grant compensates for future performance, and generally no portion of a restricted unit vests until the year after it is granted. If a director leaves the Board prior to a vest date for any reason other than a Change of Control (as defined under our long-term incentive plan), death or Permanent Disability, he or she will forfeitconvert all or any portion of the restricted units that hasPreferred Units held by such unitholders, in an aggregate amount equaling or exceeding (a) a number of Preferred Units having an aggregate value of $20.0 million, which value is calculated by multiplying the number of Preferred Units to be converted by $9.1273 or (b) if the value of the Preferred Units (calculated in accordance with clause (a) above) to be converted by the unitholder requesting conversion does not previously vested, unless vesting is otherwise acceleratedequal or exceed $20.0 million, then all of the Preferred Units held by such unitholder, into Common Units, at ratio of 1 Common Unit for 10 Preferred Units, subject to adjustment from time to time (the “Conversion Ratio”), subject to the payment of any accrued but unpaid distributions to the date of such conversion and (ii) in the event of our voluntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up, to convert all or any portion of the Preferred Units held by such Preferred Holders into Common Units, at the discretionthen applicable Conversion Ratio, subject to payment of any accrued but unpaid distributions to the date of conversion.

At any time, subject to certain liquidity requirements set forth in the Partnership Agreement, if the volume-weighted average trading price of the Compensation Committee. common units on the national securities exchange on which the common units are then listed (the “VWAP Price”) for 20 trading days over the 30-trading day period ending on the close of trading on the day immediately preceding the date notice is given by the Partnership of election of its conversion right is greater than the quotient of (i) $13.69095 divided by (ii) the then applicable Conversion Ratio (or currently $136.9095), the Managing General Partner, in its sole discretion, may convert all or a portion of the outstanding Preferred Units into Common Units, at the then applicable Conversion Ratio, subject to the payment of any accrued but unpaid distributions to the date of conversion. Also, subject to certain liquidity requirements set forth in the Partnership Agreement, if the VWAP Price of the common units for 20 trading days over the 30-trading day period ending on the close of trading on the day immediately preceding the date notice is given by the Partnership of the exercise of its conversion right is greater than the quotient of (i) $9.1273 divided by (ii) the then applicable Conversion Ratio (or currently $91.273), the Managing General Partner, in its sole discretion, may convert all, but not less than all, of the outstanding Preferred Units into a number of Common Units equal to the Adjusted Conversion Amount (as defined in the Partnership Agreement).

Cash Distributions

Each Preferred Unit is entitled to a preferred cash distribution of $0.2111 per quarter, subject to certain adjustments (the “Distribution Amount”).

Such distributions are to be paid in cash at the Distribution Amount unless, subject to certain exceptions, (i) there is no distribution being paid on Parity Securities and Junior Securities (which include the Common Units) and (ii) the Partnership’s Available Cash, excluding any deductions to provide funds for distributions of Available Cash to holders of Common Units in respect of any one or more of the next four quarters, is insufficient to pay the distribution to Preferred Holders. If we fail to pay such distribution in full in cash for any quarter, then until such time as all accrued and unpaid distributions to Preferred Holders are paid in full in cash (i) the Distribution Amount will increase to $0.2567 per quarter and (ii) we will not be permitted to declare or make (a) any distributions in respect of any Junior Securities (including the Common Units) and (b) subject to certain exceptions, any distributions in respect of any Parity Securities.

If the director’s service relationship endsPartnership fails to pay in full any distribution to its Preferred Holders, the amount of such unpaid distribution will accrue and accumulate from the last day of the quarter for which such distribution is due until paid in full. Any accrued and unpaid distributions will increase at a rate of 2.8125% per quarter.

12


The Partnership will not declare or make any distributions in respect of any Junior Securities (which include the Common Units) or any Parity Securities, subject to certain limited exceptions, unless and until all accrued and unpaid distributions on the Preferred Units have been paid in full in cash.

Rights upon a Change of Control

In the event of any transaction pursuant to which (i) the Managing General Partner or any affiliate of the director’s deathManaging General Partner exercises its rights to purchase all of the outstanding Common Units pursuant to the Partnership Agreement or Permanent Disability,(ii) any person or group of persons acquires in one or more series of related transactions all of the outstanding Common Units, in each case where the consideration received by the holders of Common Units is comprised of at least 90% cash (each, a “Cash COC Event”), the Preferred Holders shall convert the outstanding Preferred Units into Common Units immediately prior to the closing of such Cash COC Event at a conversion ratio equal to the greater of (i) the then applicable Conversion Ratio and (ii) the forfeiture restrictions lapse andquotient of (1) the award vests in full. Permanent Disability meansproduct of (a) $9.1273 multiplied by (b) 101%, divided by (2) the director’s inability, withVWAP Price of the Common Units for the 10 consecutive trading days ending immediately prior to the date of closing of the Cash COC Event, subject to a $10.00 per unit floor on Common Units received, subject to the payment of any accrued but unpaid distributions to the date of conversion.

Upon the occurrence of (a) the Common Units no longer being listed or without reasonable accommodation, by reason of illness, incapacity,admitted for trading on the NYSE or another national securities exchange, (b) any direct or indirect sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disability,disposition, in one or more series of related transactions, of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of the Partnership to perform hisany person or her duties, as determined by(c) any dissolution or liquidation of the Board for a cumulative total of 180 days in any 12-month period. Each non-employee director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expensesPartnership (other than in connection with attending meetingsa bankruptcy proceeding or a statutory winding up) (any of the Boarditems (a) through (c), or committees.a Cash COC Event, a “Change of Control”), then each Preferred Holder shall, at its sole discretion:

The following table sets forth, for the year ended December 31, 2022, all compensation reportable for directors who served during 2022, as determined by SEC rules.

Director Compensation for 2022

Name

  Fee Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
  Unit
Awards ($)(1)
  Total
($)

Alvin Bledsoe(2)

    120,000    111,209    231,209  

Warren H. Gfeller

    140,000    111,209    251,209

Janeen S. Judah

    120,000    111,209    231,209

David Lumpkins

    120,000    111,209    231,209

Angela A. Minas

    120,000    111,209    231,209

John J. Sherman

    100,000    111,209    211,209

Frances M. Vallejo

    105,000    111,209    216,209

Clay C. Williams

    120,000    111,209    231,209

Gary D. Reaves

        27,475    27,475

John Jacobi(3)

    50,000        50,000

N. John Lancaster, Jr.(3)

    50,000        50,000

Samantha Holroyd(4)

    25,000        25,000

Paul Korus(4)

    25,000        25,000

 

(1)(i)

Reflectsconvert its Preferred Units into Common Units, at the grant date fair value of unit awards. See Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, Note 13 of the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. The restricted unit grants issued to Mr. Gfeller, Ms. Judah, Mr. Lumpkins, Ms. Minas, Mr. Sherman, Ms. Vallejo and Mr. Williams will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Mr. Reaves’ restricted unit grant was issued on September 15, 2022 and will vest on January 5, 2023, the same date as the other

20LOGO


Board of Directors Information

directors. As of December 31, 2022, our non-employee directors held the following restricted unit awards: Mr. Gfeller, Ms. Judah, Mr. Lumpkins, Ms. Minas, Mr. Sherman, Ms. Vallejo and Mr. Williams each held 3,986 restricted units and Mr. Reaves held a restricted unit award for 914 units. Mr. Bledsoe deferred his unit awards pursuantthen applicable Conversion Ratio, subject to the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.

(2)

Mr. Bledsoe resigned from the board effective January 31, 2022 and the vest date on his restricted unit award was acceleratedpayment of any accrued but unpaid distributions to vest on February 14, 2022, the date elected to distribute his compensation deferred under the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.of conversion;

 

(3)(ii)

Mr. Jacobiif (1) either (x) the Partnership is not the surviving entity or (y) the Partnership is the surviving entity but the Common Units are no longer listed on the NYSE or another national securities exchange and Mr. Lancaster resigned from(2) the board effective July 1, 2022consideration per common unit exceeds $10.00, requires the Partnership to use its best efforts to deliver to such Preferred Holders a mirror security to the Preferred Units in the surviving entity, which security shall have substantially similar terms, including with respect to economics and each forfeited their 2022 restricted unit grantstructural protections, as the Preferred Units, provided, that if the Partnership is not able to deliver such a mirror security, such Preferred Holders shall be entitled to (A) take any action otherwise permitted by clause (i) above or clauses (iii) or (iv) below or (B) convert the Preferred Units held by such Preferred Holders into a number of 3,986 units, respectively.Common Units based on a conversion ratio described in the Partnership Agreement;

 

(4)(iii)

Ms. Holroydif the Partnership is the surviving entity and Mr. Korus resigned from the board effective September 15, 2022 and each forfeited their 2022 restrictedconsideration per common unit grant of 2,265 units, respectively.

LOGO21


  Executive Officers

Executive Biographies

LOGO

Robert G. Phillips

Biography

Robert G. Phillips has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of our general partner since June 2013, and, until January 2022, also served as President

Mr. Phillips served as Chairman, President and CEO of, the Partnership’s predecessor, from November 2007 until October 2013. Previously, Mr. Phillips served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. from February 2005 until June 2007 and Chief Operating Officer and a Director of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. from September 2004 until February 2005. Mr. Phillips also served on the Board of Directors of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P., the general partner of Enterprise Products Partners L.P., from February 2006 until April 2007. He previously served as Chairman of the Board and CEO of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. (GTM) from 1999exceeds $10.00, continue to 2004 prior to GTM’s merger with Enterprise Product Partners, LP, and held senior executive management positions with El Paso Corporation, including President of El Paso Field Services from 1996 to 2004. Prior to that he was Chairman, President and CEO of Eastex Energy, Inc. from 1981 to 1995. Mr. Phillips previously served as a Director of Pride International, Inc. from October 2007 to May 31, 2011, one of the world’s largest offshore drilling contractors, and was a member ofhold its Audit Committee. Mr. Phillips served as a Director of Bonavista Energy Corporation, a Canadian independent oil and gas producer, from May 2015 to March 2020. In 2021, Mr. Phillips was appointed to the National Petroleum Council which advises the United States Department of Energy on oil and gas related matters.Preferred Units; or

Mr. Phillips holds a B.B.A. from the University of Texas at Austin and a Juris Doctor degree from South Texas College of Law.

Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

LOGO

Robert T. Halpin

Biography

Robert T. Halpin, age 39, is President of Crestwood Equity Partners LP. In his role, Mr. Halpin is responsible for leading all of Crestwood’s commercial, operations, engineering and project management, financial, sustainability and corporate communications activities.

Mr. Halpin joined Crestwood in 2012 and has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Vice President of Business Development. Prior to joining Crestwood, Mr. Halpin served as an Associate at First Reserve and an investment banker in the Global Natural Resources Group at Barclays Capital.

Mr. Halpin has a bachelor’s degree in Finance from The University of Texas at Austin.

President

22LOGO


LOGO

Diaco M. Aviki

Biography

Diaco M. Aviki, age 49, is Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer at Crestwood Equity Partners LP. In his current role, Mr. Aviki is responsible for overseeing Crestwood’s commercial, business development, field operations, engineering and project management functions which primarily support Crestwood’s gathering and processing business.

Mr. Aviki joined Crestwood in 2017 as Senior Vice President of Business Development and Commercial Operations for the Gathering and Processing business segment for the Bakken and Rockies before expanding into his most recent role of Senior Vice President of Commercial, Gathering and Processing. He previously worked at BHP Billiton as Senior Manager of Midstream after serving as the Senior Manager of Natural Gas Marketing and Transportation for their Atlantic Basin Region. He began his career at ExxonMobil, holding various positions including U.S. Gas Strategy Lead.

Mr. Aviki holds a Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering from Auburn University and an MBA in Energy Finance from the University of Texas. Diaco serves on the Advisory Council for Auburn University’s College of Engineering.

Executive Vice President

and Chief Operating Officer

 

LOGO

John W. Black

(iv)

Biography

John W. Black, age 35, is Executive Vice Presidentrequire the Partnership to redeem its Preferred Units at a price of $9.218573 per Preferred Unit, plus accrued and Chief Financial Officer at Crestwood Equity Partners LP. He is responsible for overseeing Crestwood’s financial strategy, including financial planning and analysis, capital markets execution, investor relations, treasury and cash management.

Mr. Black joined Crestwood in 2014 and previously served as Senior Vice Presidentunpaid distributions to the date of Finance and Vice President of Finance. Prior to joining Crestwood, he was an Associate at First Reserve and an Analystsuch redemption (which redemption may be paid, in the Mergers & Acquisitions group at Citi.

Mr. Black holds a Bachelorsole discretion of Sciencethe Managing General Partner, in Commerce fromcash or in Common Units, in accordance with the Universityterms of Virginia.

the Partnership Agreement).

Voting

The Preferred Units have voting rights that are identical to the voting rights of the Common Units and shall vote with the Common Units as a single class, with each Preferred Unit being entitled to one vote for each Common Unit into which such Preferred Unit is convertible at the then-applicable Conversion Ratio, except that the Preferred Units (subject to certain exclusions) shall be entitled to vote as a separate class on any matter on which all unitholders are entitled to vote that adversely affects the rights, powers, privileges or preferences of the Preferred Units in relation to the Partnership’s other securities or as required by law. Subject to certain

 

13


exceptions, (i) if (a) the three largest Preferred Holders, together with all affiliates of such Preferred Holders that hold Preferred Units, collectively constitute at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding Preferred Units and (b) GSO COF II Holdings Partners (Facility) LP and Magnetar Financial LLC, and each of their respective affiliates, collectively own at least 35% of the outstanding Preferred Units, then the approval of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding Preferred Units (subject to certain exclusions) shall be required to approve any matter for which the Preferred Holders are entitled to vote as a separate class, and otherwise, (ii) the approval of a majority of the outstanding Preferred Units (subject to certain exclusions) shall be required to approve any matter for which the Preferred Holders are entitled to vote as a separate class (each of (i) and (ii), a “Voting Threshold”).

A Change of Control in which consideration to be received by the holders of Common Units has a value of less than $10.00 per Common Unit requires approval of the Preferred Holders at the then-applicable Voting Threshold.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

Equiniti currently serves as transfer agent and registrar for the Preferred Units.

14


PURPOSE OF THE CONSENT SOLICITATION

Background

On August 16, 2023, the Partnership and Energy Transfer, among other parties, entered into the merger agreement, pursuant to which the Partnership will merge with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub surviving the merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Transfer. Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Partnership has agreed, at the request of Energy Transfer, to cooperate with Energy Transfer in respect of any plans of Energy Transfer to (a) commence one or more tender offers to purchase any or all of the outstanding Preferred Units prior to the closing of the merger for cash and (b) conduct one or more consent solicitations to obtain from the requisite holders of Preferred Units consent to certain amendments to the terms of the Preferred Units. In connection with the merger and at the direction of Energy Transfer, pursuant to the merger agreement, the Partnership and the Managing General Partner are soliciting Consents from the Preferred Holders to approve the amendment of the Partnership Agreement as set forth in the Proposed Amendment contained in Annex A to this Consent Solicitation Statement.

Reasons for the Consent Solicitation

The purpose of the Consent Solicitation is to (i) increase the cash redemption price for the Preferred Units in connection with a cash redemption election in the merger, and (ii) conform certain terms of the Preferred Units with Energy Transfer’s other outstanding series of preferred units in order to simplify Energy Transfer’s capital structure following the merger.

Proposed Amendment

The Proposed Amendment is contained in Annex A and, if approved, would amend Section 5.8 of the Partnership Agreement as follows:

Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

 

LOGO23


LOGO

Steven M. Dougherty

1.

Biography

Steven M. Dougherty, age 50, is Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting OfficerSection 5.8(e)(ii)(D) of the Partnership Agreement provides holders the right to have Preferred Units redeemed at Crestwood Equity Partners LP. He oversees accounting, financial reporting, tax, audit and information technology.

Mr. Dougherty joined Crestwooda price equal to 101% of the Preferred Unit Price in 2012 and previously served as Interim Chief Financial Officerthe event of Crestwood. Priora Change of Control (other than a Cash COC Event). The Proposed Amendment would permit us to Crestwood, Mr. Dougherty spent eleven years at El Paso Corporation as Directorincrease the redemption price payable to holders making a cash redemption election pursuant to Section 5.8(e)(ii)(D) of Corporate Accounting and seven years workingthe Partnership Agreement in public accounting at KPMG LLP.

Mr. Dougherty holds a B.B.A and a Masterconnection with the merger from 101% of Public Accountancy from the UniversityPreferred Unit Price (or $9.218573 per Preferred Unit) to 108% of Texas at Austin.the Preferred Unit Price (or $9.857484 per Preferred Unit);

Executive Vice President

and Chief Accounting

Officer

 

LOGO

Joel C. Lambert

2.

Biography

Joel C. Lambert, age 54, is Executive Vice President and Chief Legal, Safety and Compliance Officer at Crestwood Equity Partners LP. Mr. LambertSection 5.8(c)(i) of the Partnership Agreement provides oversight and guidance on all legal matters, corporate governance, safety and compliance.

Prior to joining Crestwood in 2013, Mr. Lambert was Vice President, Legal, at First Reserve. He joined First Reserve in 2007 and served on Crestwood’s board of directors from 2010 to 2013. Prior to First Reserve, he worked as an associate attorneythat in the Business and International Section of Vinson & Elkins LLP, bothevent the Partnership fails to pay in their Houston and Moscow offices. Before that, he was an Internfull in cash any distribution (or portion thereof) which a Preferred Holder is entitled to receive for Chief Justice Tom Phillips ona quarter under the Texas Supreme Court as well as a Russian linguist and Military Intelligence SpecialistPartnership Agreement, (i) then the Preferred Unit Distribution Amount for the United States Army. Mr. Lambert servedimmediately following quarter will be the Deficiency Rate and (ii) any accrued and unpaid distributions will increase at a rate of 2.8125% per quarter. The Proposed Amendment would eliminate the application of (a) the Deficiency Rate with respect to distributions payable to the Preferred Holders during any quarter in Iraqwhich distributions are accrued and Saudi Arabia during Desert Shieldunpaid and Desert Storm.

Mr. Lambert holds a bachelor’s degree in Environmental Design from Texas A&M University(b) the 2.8125% rate of increase per quarter to any accrued and Juris Doctor degree from the University of Texas School of Law. Currently serves on the board of Junior Achievement of Southeast Texas and Performing Arts Houston.

unpaid distributions;

Executive Vice President

and Chief Legal, Safety and

Compliance Officer

 

3.
24LOGO

Section 5.8(c)(i) of the Partnership Agreement provides that each Preferred Unit is entitled to share in any special distributions by the Partnership of cash, securities or other property pro rata with the Partnership’s Common Units as if the Preferred Units had converted into Common Units. Special distributions do not include regular quarterly distributions paid in the normal course pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, so long as such distributions are not in excess of 130% of the quarterly distribution rate for the prior quarter. The Proposed Amendment would provide Preferred Holders the right to receive (and share pro rata with holders of Common Units in) any portion of any quarterly cash distribution made in the normal course to holders of Common Units that is in excess of an amount that is the greater of (i) the amount of the highest previously paid quarterly cash distribution after the date of the merger and (ii) the amount equal to 115% of the quarterly cash distribution for the immediately preceding quarter; and

15


LOGO

William H. Moore

4.

Biography

William H. Moore, age 43, is Executive Vice President, Corporate Strategy at Crestwood Equity Partners LP. In this role, Mr. Moore is focused on strategic planning and corporate development, including asset and M&A transaction origination, execution and commercial developmentSection 5.8(d) of the Partnership Agreement provides that Preferred Holders are entitled to support the partnership’s long-term strategic goals. Mr. Moore serves as the head of Crestwood’s Kansas City corporate office.

Mr. Moore joined Inergy, which merged with Crestwood in 2013,vote as a legal analystseparate class on any matter that adversely affects the rights, powers, privileges or preferences of the Preferred Units in relation to other classes of Partnership Interests. The current Voting Threshold provides that the affirmative vote of a majority of the Preferred Units is required to approve such matters, except that the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Preferred Units is required to approve matters (i) that alter the rights and business development associate. During his timeobligations of the Preferred Units in any material respect, increase or decrease the authorized number of Preferred Units, or otherwise adversely affect the Preferred Units or (ii) when the three largest Preferred Holders collectively own two-thirds of the Preferred Units or certain of our initial Preferred Holders own at Inergy, Mr. Moore held various positionsleast 35% of the Preferred Units. Section 5.8(d) of the Partnership Agreement also provides that the Partnership may, without the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Preferred Units, create and issue Junior Securities and Parity Securities in corporatean unlimited amount, with respect to Junior Securities, and, business development, including Directorwith respect to Parity Securities, in an amount not to exceed $300 million in aggregate face value and that shall not be convertible into more than 48,125,000 Common Units, subject to certain restrictions set forth in the Partnership Agreement. The Proposed Amendment would conform the voting rights of Midstream DevelopmentPreferred Holders to the voting rights of holders of Energy Transfer’s other outstanding series of preferred units by (a) eliminating the right of Preferred Holders to vote together, on an as-converted basis, with the Common Units as a single class, (b) providing that the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Preferred Units, voting as a separate class, is required to adopt any amendment to the Partnership Agreement that the Managing General Partner determines would have a material and Vice President of Corporate Development.

Mr. Moore servesadverse effect on the Boardrights of Governors for the UniversityPreferred Units, and (c) providing that the affirmative vote of Kansas Schoolholders of Law. He holdsat least two-thirds of the outstanding Preferred Units, voting together as a B.A. and M.B.A from Fort Hays State University, and a Juris Doctor degree fromclass with other parity securities, is required to (1) create or issue any Parity Securities if cumulative distributions on the University of Kansas School of Law.

Preferred Units are in arrears or (2) create or issue any Senior Securities.

Executive Vice President,

Corporate Strategy

LOGO25


If the proposed amendment is approved by the requisite holders of Preferred Units, the consideration you may elect to receive in the merger, as a holder of Preferred Units, will be affected in the following ways: (a) if you elect to receive a new security of Energy Transfer, such security will have terms as reflected by the proposed amendment, and (b) if you make a redemption election, the cash redemption price will increase from $9.218573 to $9.857484 per Preferred Unit. We will announce the results of the consent solicitation as promptly as possible following the Expiration Date, which announcement is anticipated to be at least 10 days before the deadline to make a merger consideration election for your Preferred Units, assuming the Expiration Date is not extended.

 

  Proposal 2 — Advisory Vote16


THE CONSENT SOLICITATION

Record Date

The Record Date is the close of business on September 22, 2023. This Consent Solicitation Statement is being sent to Approveall record holders of Preferred Units as of the Record Date. The Record Date has been fixed as the date for the determination of Preferred Holders entitled to give Consents pursuant to the Consent Solicitation. The Managing General Partner reserves the right to establish, from time to time, but in all cases prior to the Consent Effective Date, any new date as such Record Date with respect to the Preferred Units and, thereupon, any such new date will be deemed to be the Record Date for purposes of the Consent Solicitation. “Consent Effective Date” means 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the date, if any, on which Requisite Consents shall have been received by the Tabulation Agent.

  Executive CompensationGeneral

As of the Record Date, there were 71,257,445 outstanding Preferred Units. The Proposed Amendment will not become operative until after the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the Consent Solicitation, as applicable. These conditions include receipt of the Requisite Consents and the satisfaction or waiver, as applicable, of the Merger Conditions by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated. See “—Conditions to the Consent Solicitation.” The Managing General Partner reserves the right to amend the terms and conditions of the Consent Solicitation at any time prior to the Expiration Date for any reason, including, but not limited to, earlier concluding, extending and/or terminating the Consent Solicitation. If the Requisite Consents are received (and not revoked) at or prior to the Expiration Date, the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, and the First Amendment is executed by the Managing General Partner, the amendments to the terms of the Preferred Units effected thereby will be binding on all Preferred Holders, including non-consenting Preferred Holders and their transferees. The delivery of a Consent will not affect a Preferred Holder’s right to sell or transfer Preferred Units, and a sale or transfer of any Preferred Units after the Record Date will not have the effect of revoking any Consent properly given by the registered holder of such Preferred Unit. Therefore, each properly executed and delivered Consent will be counted notwithstanding any sale or transfer of any Preferred Unit to which such Consent relates, unless the applicable registered holder has complied with the procedure for revoking Consents, as described herein.

Requisite Consents

The adoption of the Proposed Amendment requires the consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the issued and outstanding Preferred Units. As of the Record Date, there were 71,257,445 Preferred Units issued and outstanding.

Conditions to the Consent Solicitation

The Consent Solicitation is conditioned upon, and the Proposed Amendment will not become effective unless and until, the Tabulation Agent has received the Requisite Consents and the Merger Conditions have been satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated.

How to Consent

General

This Consent Solicitation Statement is being sent to record holders of Preferred Units as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 22, 2023.

 

17


This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, provides our unitholdersPreferred Holders who wish to consent to the Proposed Amendment must deliver their properly submitted Consent in accordance with the opportunityprocedures described below so that it is received by the Tabulation Agent on or before the Expiration Date.

Each Preferred Holder who delivers a Consent in accordance with the procedures set forth herein will be deemed to casthave validly consented to the Proposed Amendment.

All of the Preferred Units are held in book-entry form. Only registered holders of the Preferred Units are authorized to deliver Consents with respect to their Preferred Units. Therefore, to deliver a pass-through advisory voteConsent, the beneficial owner of Preferred Units must instruct its DTC Participant to deliver the Consents on the beneficial owner’s behalf according to the procedures described below. Consents should be delivered on a per unit basis, meaning Preferred Holders should deliver one Consent for each of their Preferred Units.

DTC has confirmed that the Consent Solicitation is eligible for DTC’s ATOP procedures. Accordingly, DTC Participants must electronically deliver a Consent by causing DTC to temporarily transfer and surrender their Preferred Units to the Information and Tabulation Agent in accordance with DTC’s ATOP (contra CUSIP) procedures. By making such transfer, DTC Participants will be deemed to have delivered a Consent with respect to any Preferred Units so transferred and surrendered. DTC will verify each temporary transfer and surrender and confirm the electronic delivery of such Consent by sending an Agent’s Message (as defined below) to the Information and Tabulation Agent.

The term “Agent’s Message” means a message transmitted by DTC and received by the Information and Tabulation Agent, which states that DTC has received an express acknowledgment from the DTC Participant delivering Consents that such DTC Participant (1) has received and agrees to be bound by the terms of the applicable Consent Solicitation as set forth in this Consent Solicitation Statement and that the Partnership may enforce such agreement against such DTC Participant and (2) consents to the Proposed Amendment as described in this Consent Solicitation Statement.

The Information and Tabulation Agent will establish a new ATOP account or utilize an existing account with respect to the Preferred Units at DTC (the “Book-Entry Transfer Facility”) promptly after the date of this Consent Solicitation Statement (to the extent that such arrangement has not already been made by the Information and Tabulation Agent), and any financial institution that is a participant in the Book-Entry Transfer Facility system and whose name appears on a security position listing as the owner of Preferred Units may make book-entry delivery of Preferred Units into the Information and Tabulation Agent’s account in accordance with the Book-Entry Transfer Facility’s procedures for such transfer. Delivery of documents to the Book-Entry Transfer Facility in accordance with such Book-Entry Transfer Facility does not constitute delivery to the Information and Tabulation Agent.

18


CONSENTS MUST BE ELECTRONICALLY DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DTC’S

ATOP PROCEDURES.

A beneficial owner of Preferred Units held through a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company, other nominee or DTC Participant must provide appropriate instructions to such person in order to cause a delivery of Consent through ATOP with respect to such Preferred Units.

Preferred Holders desiring to deliver their Consents prior to the applicable Expiration Date should note that they must allow sufficient time for completion of the ATOP procedures during the normal business hours of DTC on such respective date. Consents not delivered prior to the Expiration Date will be disregarded and of no effect.

The method of delivery of Consents through the ATOP procedures and any other required documents to the Information and Tabulation Agent is at the election and risk of the Preferred Holder, and delivery will be deemed made only when made through ATOP in accordance with the procedures described herein.

Deliveries of Consents or notices of revocation will not be deemed to have been made until such irregularities have been cured or waived. The Partnership’s interpretation of the terms and conditions of the Consent Solicitations (including this Consent Solicitation Statement) will be final and binding on all parties.

No consent form or letter of transmittal needs to be executed in relation to the Consent Solicitations or the Consents delivered through DTC. The valid electronic delivery of Consents through the temporary transfer and surrender of Preferred Units in accordance with DTC’s ATOP procedures shall constitute a written consent to the Consent Solicitation.

Preferred Holders should not tender or deliver their Preferred Units at any time.

The registered ownership of a Preferred Unit as of the Record Date shall be determined by Equiniti, as transfer agent and registrar of the Preferred Units. The ownership of Preferred Units held through DTC by DTC Participants shall be established by a DTC security position listing provided by DTC as of the Record Date.

Giving a Consent will not affect the Preferred Holder’s right to sell or transfer the Preferred Units. DTC will create escrow positions for each Preferred Holder who delivers a valid Consent to the Proposed Amendment prior to the Expiration Date, and who has not validly revoked such Consent, prior to the Consent Effective Date. The payment of any Consent Fee will be paid to the Preferred Holders who delivered valid Consents even if such Preferred Holder sells or transfers its Preferred Units prior to the Expiration Date. No Consent Fee will be paid with respect to any Preferred Units for which no Consent is delivered on or prior to the Expiration Date, even though the Proposed Amendment, if approved, will bind all holders of such Preferred Units and their transferees upon the effectiveness of the Proposed Amendment.

Determination of Validity

All questions as to the validity, form, eligibility (including time of receipt) and acceptance of any delivered Consent pursuant to any of the procedures described above shall be determined by the Partnership, in its sole discretion (which determination shall be final and binding). The Partnership reserves the absolute right to reject any or all deliveries of any Consent determined by it not to be in proper form or the acceptance of which would, in the Partnership’s opinion, be unlawful. The Partnership also reserves the absolute right, in its sole discretion, to waive any defect or irregularity as to any delivery of any Consent of any particular Preferred Holder, regardless of whether similar defects or irregularities are waived in the case of other Preferred Holders. The Partnership’s interpretation of the terms and conditions of the Consent Solicitation shall be final and binding. Any defect or irregularity in connection with deliveries of Consents must be cured within such time as the Partnership determines, unless waived by the Partnership. Deliveries of Consents shall not be deemed to have been made until all defects and irregularities have been waived by the Partnership or cured. Neither the

19


Partnership nor any other person shall be under any duty to give notification to any Preferred Holder of any defects or irregularities in deliveries of Consents or shall incur any liability for failure to give any such notification.

Expiration Date; Extensions; Amendment

The Expiration Date is October 17, 2023 at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The Managing General Partner reserves the right (but is not obligated), in its sole discretion and subject to applicable law, at any time prior to the Expiration Date to (i) terminate the Consent Solicitation for any reason, including if the Requisite Consents have not been received or if the merger is terminated; (ii) earlier conclude the Consent Solicitation upon obtaining the Requisite Consent; or (iii) amend the terms of the Consent Solicitation (including to extend the Expiration Date). The Managing General Partner reserves the right (but is not obligated) to accept any Consent received by any other reasonable means or in any form that reasonably evidences the giving of consent to the approval of the compensationProposed Amendment.

Revocation of our named executive officers. We are asking unitholdersConsents

Prior to approve,the Consent Effective Date, any Preferred Holder may revoke any Consent given as to its Preferred Units or any portion of such Preferred Units. Only a Preferred Holder on an advisory basis, the compensationRecord Date may deliver a Consent or revoke any Consent previously delivered by such Preferred Holder. Any person or entity that becomes a holder of our named executive officers as disclosedthe Preferred Units after the Record Date will not have the authority to deliver a Consent to the Proposed Amendment or to revoke any Consent previously delivered by a Holder relating to the Preferred Units held by the subsequent holder. Preferred Holders who wish to exercise their right of revocation with respect to a Consent must give a properly transmitted “Requested Message” through ATOP, which must be received by the Tabulation Agent through ATOP, prior to the Consent Effective Date.

In order to be valid, a notice of revocation must specify the Preferred Holder in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,Book-Entry Transfer Facility whose name appears on the Summary Compensation Table,security position listing as the owner of such Preferred Units and the related compensation tablesnumber of the Preferred Units with respect to which a Consent is to be revoked. Validly revoked Consents may be redelivered by following the procedures described elsewhere in this Consent Solicitation Statement at any time prior to the Expiration Date. Consents may not be revoked after the Consent Effective Date.

Also, if the Consent Solicitation is amended prior to the Expiration Date in a manner determined by the Partnership, in its sole discretion, to constitute a material change to the terms of the Consent Solicitation, the Partnership will promptly disseminate additional applicable Consent Solicitation materials and narrative.may (but is not required to) extend the Expiration Date for a period deemed by the Partnership to be adequate to permit Preferred Holders to consider such amendments and, if required by applicable law or in the Partnership’s sole discretion, extend the right of Preferred Holders to revoke or withdraw their Consents.

AsTo be effective, a notice of revocation must be in a format customarily used by DTC.

A revocation of a Consent may only be rescinded by the execution and delivery of a new Consent in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Consent Solicitation Statement. A Preferred Holder who has delivered a revocation at any time prior to the Consent Effective Date may thereafter deliver a new Consent until the Expiration Date in accordance with the procedures described in this Consent Solicitation Statement. A revocation to a Consent can only be accomplished in accordance with the Compensation Discussionforegoing procedures.

The Partnership intends to consult with the Information and Analysis sectionTabulation Agent to determine whether the Information and Tabulation Agent has received any revocations of Consents. The Partnership reserves the right to contest the validity of any revocation, and all questions as to the validity (including time of receipt) of any revocation will be determined by the Partnership in its sole discretion, which determination will be conclusive and binding.

20


A revocation of the Consent will be effective only as to the Preferred Units listed on the revocation and only if such revocation complies with the provisions of this ProxyConsent Solicitation Statement. Only a Preferred Holder of record is entitled to revoke a Consent previously given. A beneficial owner of the Preferred Units must arrange with its broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee company to execute and deliver on its behalf a revocation of any Consent already given with respect to such Preferred Units.

Consent Fee

If the Requisite Consents are received by the Tabulation Agent through ATOP (and not revoked) at or prior to the Expiration Date and the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, then the Partnership will, as promptly as practicable after, and only if, the Merger Conditions are satisfied or waived, as applicable, by the parties to the merger agreement and the merger agreement is not otherwise terminated, pay to the Consenting Holders from whom properly submitted Consents are received by the Tabulation Agent on or prior to the Expiration Date a Consent Fee equal to $0.182546 for each Preferred Unit with respect to which consents are received (and not revoked) on or prior to the Expiration Date. No Consent Fee will be paid with respect to any Preferred Units for which no Consent is delivered on or prior to the Expiration Date, even though the Proposed Amendment, if approved, will bind all holders of such Preferred Units and their transferees upon the effectiveness of the Proposed Amendment.

Expected U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Preferred Holders upon Receipt of the Consent Fee

This discussion of the expected U.S. federal income tax consequences to Preferred Holders upon the receipt of the Consent Fee is focused solely on Preferred Holders who are individual citizens or residents of the United States (for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that hold their preferred units as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment) (“U.S. holders”). This discussion does not address any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or non-U.S. jurisdiction or any U.S. federal laws other than income tax laws (such as estate or gift tax laws) and does not address the net investment income tax. The Partnership has not sought a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) with respect to such tax consequences, and the IRS is not precluded from taking positions contrary to those described herein.

The Partnership intends to report the Consent Fee as ordinary income paid to U.S. holders as consideration for their Consents.

Information reporting requirements may apply to the Consent Fee paid to a U.S. holder. A U.S. holder may also be subject to backup withholding (currently at the rate of 24%) with respect to the Consent Fee unless the U.S. holder is (i) a corporation or other exempt recipient and, when required, establishes this exemption or (ii) provides its correct taxpayer identification number, certifies that it is not currently subject to backup withholding tax and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding tax rules. A U.S. holder that does not provide its correct taxpayer identification number may be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a U.S. holder can be refunded or credited against the U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS in a timely manner.

Information and Tabulation Agent

The Partnership has appointed D.F. King & Co., Inc. as Information and Tabulation Agent for the Consent Solicitation to, among other things, receive, tabulate and verify Consents. All correspondence sent to the Information and Tabulation Agent should be directed to the address set forth on the back cover of this Consent Solicitation Statement. The Partnership has agreed to indemnify the Information and Tabulation Agent for certain

liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws. D.F. King & Co., Inc. has agreed to facilitate the Consent Solicitations; however, the Partnership is solely responsible for the information contained in the Consent Solicitation materials. The Information and Tabulation Agent makes no recommendation as to whether Preferred Holders should deliver Consents in response to the Consent Solicitation.

21


Requests for additional copies of and questions relating to the Consent Solicitation Statement, the Compensation Committee has structured our executive compensation programPartnership Agreement, and the documents incorporated by reference into this Consent Solicitation Statement may be directed to tie total compensationthe Information and Tabulation Agent at the address and telephone number set forth on the back cover of this Consent Solicitation Statement. Holders of the Preferred Units may also contact their broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company, other nominee or DTC Participant for assistance concerning the Consent Solicitation.

In connection with the Consent Solicitation, directors, officers and regular employees of the Partnership (who will not be specifically compensated for such services) may solicit Consents by use of the mails, personally or by telephone, facsimile or other means.

Energy Transfer will pay the Information and Tabulation Agent reasonable and customary fees for its services and will reimburse it for its reasonable and documented expenses in connection those services. Energy Transfer will also reimburse brokers and dealers for customary mailing and handling expenses incurred by them in forwarding copies of this Consent Solicitation Statement and related documents to long-term performance that supports unitholder value, as reflected primarily in our common unit price.the beneficial owners of the Preferred Units.

Solicitation Agent

We believe our compensation philosophy has served our employees and unitholders well. In 2022,have entered into a solicitation agent agreement with BofA Securities, Inc. (“BofA Securities”), pursuant to which BofA Securities will act as part of our corporate governance engagement with our unitholders, including both large and small investors, we met with representatives of unitholders owning over 40% of our common units. During these meetings, unitholders expressed no concernsSolicitation Agent in connection with the mannerConsent Solicitation. The Solicitation Agent may contact you regarding the Consent Solicitation and may request brokers, dealers and other nominees to forward this Consent Solicitation Statement and related materials to beneficial owners of the Preferred Units. We have agreed to pay the Solicitation Agent customary fees and to reimburse the Solicitation Agent for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in which our executive compensation program operates.connection with its services. We also have agreed to indemnify the Solicitation Agent and its affiliates against certain liabilities in connection with its services.

We urge unitholders to read the Compensation DiscussionBofA Securities and Analysis,its affiliates comprise a full service securities firm and commercial bank engaged in securities, commodities and derivatives trading, foreign exchange and other brokerage activities, and principal investing as well as providing investment, corporate and private banking, asset and investment management, financing and financial advisory services and other commercial services and products to a wide range of companies, governments and individuals. At any given time, the Summary Compensation TableSolicitation Agent and related compensation tablesits affiliates may trade the securities or other debt or equity securities of the Partnership or its affiliates for its own account or for the accounts of its customers and, narrative, which provide detailed information on the compensation of our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee and the Board believe that the policies and procedures articulatedaccordingly, may hold a long or short position in the Compensation DiscussionPreferred Units or other such securities. The Solicitation Agent and Analysisits affiliates have provided in the past, and are effectivecurrently providing, other investment banking and financial advisory services to the Partnership, for which they have received or will receive customary compensation, as applicable. The Solicitation Agent and its affiliates may in achieving our goalsthe future provide various investment banking and thatother services to the compensation of our named executive officers has supported and contributed to our success.Partnership, for which they would receive customary compensation.

The Board of Directors recommends thatSolicitation Agent does not assume any responsibility for the unitholders vote in favoraccuracy or completeness of the following resolution:information contained in this Consent Solicitation Statement or for any failure by the Partnership to disclose events that may have occurred and may affect the significance or accuracy of such information.

“RESOLVED,Retail Soliciting Fee

The Partnership will pay Retail Soliciting Dealers retail soliciting fees. Each Retail Soliciting Dealer that successfully delivers Consents from a retail beneficial owner of the compensationPreferred Units will be eligible to receive the Retail Soliciting Fee from the Partnership equal to $0.0456365 per Preferred Unit for which a Consent is validly delivered and not revoked by or on behalf of such retail beneficial owner, except for any Preferred Units for which Consents are delivered by a Retail Soliciting Dealer for its own account. The Retail Soliciting Fee will only be paid to the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402each Retail Soliciting Dealer in respect of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby APPROVED.”

Although this advisory vote is not binding, the Compensation Committee will consider the voting results when evaluating our executive compensation program.beneficial owners who deliver Consents in respect of Preferred Units in an aggregate amount of 25,000 Preferred Units or fewer.

 

LOGO

22

The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR"

approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive

compensation as described in this Proxy

Statement.

26LOGO


No Appraisal Rights

Preferred Holders are not entitled to rights of an objecting unitholder or appraisal rights under Delaware law in connection with the Proposed Amendment or this Consent Solicitation.

Fees and Expenses

The entire cost of this Consent Solicitation will be borne by Energy Transfer. We will request brokerage houses, nominees, custodians, fiduciaries, and other like parties to forward this Consent Solicitation Statement to the beneficial owners of the Preferred Units held of record by them, and Energy Transfer will reimburse such persons for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in forwarding such materials.

 

  Beneficial Ownership of Shares23


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

TheTo our knowledge, the following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common unitsCommon Units and preferred unitsPreferred Units as of March 15,the close of business on September 22, 2023 (except as otherwise indicated) by (i)noted in the footnotes below) and with respect to: (1) each person or entity known by us to beneficially own 5% or more than 5%of the outstanding Common Units and Preferred Units; (2) each member of the Board; (3) each of our common units or preferred units, (ii) eachnamed executive officers; and (4) the members of the executive officers of the General Partner, (iii) each of the directors of the General Partner,Board and (iv) all directors andour current executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to any interests

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the reporting person’s spouse, we believe thatSEC and generally includes voting or dispositive power with respect to securities. To our knowledge, except as indicated in the beneficial owners of common units listed below, based on information furnished by such owners,footnotes to this table and pursuant to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to such common units. Asall Common Units shown as beneficially owned by them. Percentage of March 15, 2023, we had 105,354,037 common units outstandingclass amounts are based on 105,096,104 Common Units and 71,257,445 preferred units outstanding.

Name of Beneficial Owner(1)

  Amount and
Nature of
Common Unit
Beneficial
Ownership(2)
  Percent of
Common
Units
Owned
 Amount and
Nature of
Preferred Unit
Beneficial
Ownership(3)
  Percent of
Preferred
Units
Owned

ALPS Advisors, Inc.(4)

    12,335,027    11.8%       

FR XIII Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings LLC(5)

    11,257,436    10.8%       

CIBC Private Wealth Group, LLC(6)

           9,755,026    13.7%

Diaco Aviki

    138,056    *       

John Black

    93,849    *       

Steven M. Dougherty

    396,802    *       

Warren H. Gfeller

    65,964    *       

Robert T. Halpin

    550,839    *       

Janeen S. Judah

    21,879    *       

Joel C. Lambert

    346,024    *       

David Lumpkins

    55,571    *       

Angela A. Minas

    8,186    *       

William H. Moore

    238,534    *       

Robert G. Phillips

    1,166,169    1.11%       

Gary D. Reaves

    8,065    *       

John J. Sherman

    3,245,463    3.08%       

Frances M. Vallejo

    13,981    *       

Clay C. Williams

    8,186    *       

Directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)

    6,357,568    5.14%       

*

Less than 1%.

(1)

Unless otherwise indicated, the contact address for all beneficial owners in this tablePreferred Units outstanding as of September 22, 2023. Percentage of all outstanding voting unit amounts is 811 Main Street, Suite 3400, Houston, Texas 77002.

(2)

Excludes 437,587 performance phantom units granted to our executive officers pursuant to the Crestwood Equity Long-Term Incentive Plan.

(3)

Each preferred unitholder is entitled to vote on a 1-for-10 as converted basis with every ten preferred units entitled to one vote.

(4)

Based on Schedule 13G filed by ALPS Advisors, Inc. on February 13, 2023. The address of ALPS Advisors, Inc. is 1290 Broadway, Suite 1000, Denver, CO 80203.

(5)

Based on Schedule 13D filed by FR XIII Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings LLC on September 19, 2022. The address of FR XIII Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings LLC is 262 Harbor Drive, Third Floor, Suite 3100, Stamford, CT 06902.

(6)

Based on Schedule 13G filed by CIBC Private Wealth Group, LLC. on January 10, 2023. The address of CIBC Private Wealth Group is 181 West Madison Street, Chicago, IL 60602.

LOGO27


  Sustainability and ESG

At Crestwood, sustainability means operating in an ethically, environmentally and socially responsible manner, focusing on safety, respecting and supporting our communities, protecting the environment, and developing our employees.

In January 2022, we published our second three-year sustainability strategy which outlines the focus areas for our ESG/sustainability initiatives that will continue to drive our performance, create impact and maintain our MLP ESG midstream leadership position. The development of our 2022-2024 sustainability strategy is a result of our materiality assessment update, which includes input from key stakeholders and investors.

Our second sustainability strategy focuses on Supply Chain Management, Transparency and Disclosure, Biodiversity & Ecosystem Protection, Carbon Management, Diversity, Equity & Inclusion and Indigenous Relations.

Strategy Objective

Our three-year Sustainability Strategy is aligned with the delivery of our business goals while also being responsive to our stakeholders needs. Integrating sustainability across our business will underpin our success as a best-in-class midstream company.

Crestwood’s Sustainability Strategy
BUSINESS    

STRATEGY    

  Differentiate Crestwood through execution, sustainability and industry leadership to be a must-own investment

  Focused on quality growth, asset optimization and thoughtful consolidation opportunities, while maintaining financial strength and discipline

  Continue to generate strong free cash flow after distributions to enhance our return of capital to unitholders

  Drive best-in-class operations for safety, customer service, community engagement and environmental responsibility

FOCUS AREAS    

2022-2024    

GovernanceEnvironmentSocial

LOGO

Supply Chain
Management

LOGO

Transparency
& Disclosure

LOGO

Biodiversity
& Ecosystem
Protection

LOGO

Carbon
Management

LOGO

Diversity,
Equity &
Inclusion

LOGO

Indigenous
Relations

To build a
dynamic and
diverse supply
chain that
operationalizes
sustainability,
mitigates risk,
and meets
organizational
objectives.

To strive for
robust, quality
and verified
data as the
core foundation
to reliable ESG
disclosures.

To mitigate
impacts on and
to enhance
species and
ecosystems.

To lead the
midstream
industry in
best-in-class
carbon
management
practices and
technology
implementation.

To create a
diverse culture
where everyone
feels valued,
while building
a pipeline of
future talent
and enhancing
retention
efforts of
current talent.

To continue to
further our
existing culture
of open and
transparent
dialogue with
Indigenous
stakeholders
where all
parties feel
engaged and
respected.

28LOGO


Sustainability and ESG

Sustainability Strategy Highlights in 2022

In 2022, Crestwood made significant strides in the first year of its 2022-2024 sustainability strategy.

Focus Area

2022 Key Achievements

LOGO

Biodiversity
& Ecosystem
Protection

  Received Wildlife Habitat Council Recertification for Grasslands Project on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation

  Partnered with Continental Resources to renew the Plan for the Development of Oil and Gas Resources within the Sage-Grouse Core Population area

Carbon
Management

  Linked employee compensation to methane emissions intensity reduction for three consecutive years

  Conducted a physical climate risk assessment on key facilities

LOGO

Diversity, Equity
and Inclusion

  Continued to monitor pay equity, including gender, race and age

  Conducted Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training for a second consecutive year

  Continued strategic partnerships such as Catalyst

Indigenous
Relations

  Support STEM education at Indigenous schools in North Dakota

  Donated $3 million to organizations to support the MHA Nation on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation since 2017

  Conduct bi-annual meeting with Chairman Mark Fox to understand environmental and social issues affecting the MHA Nation

LOGO

Supply Chain Management

  Since 2019, over $210 million spent with diverse suppliers

  16% of our suppliers are diverse in 2022

Transparency    

& Disclosure

  MSCI Score Upgraded to A from BBB

  Integrated ESG performance in Inaugural Proxy Statement

  Disclosed Board Skills Matrix

  Developed an ESG Reporting Manual and continue to work with Internal Audit and Financial Reporting teams to enhance ESG reporting controls

*

More details on achievements made on Carbon Management and DEI can be found in the following pages of the 2023 Proxy Statement

LOGO29


Sustainability and ESG

Carbon Management Plan

Carbon management is a leading component of our three-year sustainability strategy. Published in January 2022, our carbon management plan outlines near-term emissions reduction activities that we intend to implement and highlights not only a series of commitments, but also the mechanisms for achievement of those commitments as we continue to expand our leading Gathering and Processing asset portfolio. In 2022, we made significant strides in executing upon key deliverables outlined in the carbon management plan.

Commitments

2022 Key Achievements

LOGO

Annual GHG
Intensity
Reduction

•  Incorporated Oasis Midstream and Sendero Midstream assets into carbon management practices

– Performed methane detection flyovers on all acquired assets within 180 days

•  Conducted LDAR/flyovers on 100% of our facilities with methane emissions sources

LOGO

Scope 2
Emissions

•  Employed optical character recognition (OCR) technology to minimize manual calculations and improve the accuracy of Scope 2 data

LOGO

Carbon
Acquisition/
Divestiture
Protocol

•  Developed and utilized a Carbon Acquisition/Divestiture Protocol that formalizes how Crestwood handles transferred emissions for recent and future A&D activity designed to support our goal of reduced emissions intensity rates and leading carbon management performance

LOGO

Continuous
Methane
Emissions
Monitoring

•  Installed continuous methane detection devices at 13% of our facilities testing three different technologies

– Installed devices at newly acquired Oasis Midstream assets

•  Participated in Cheniere-Led QMRV Midstream Project to further test multiple technologies for methane detection and to establish baseline emissions levels

LOGO

Responsibly
Sourced Gas

•  Provided comments to the MiQ Midstream Protocol via GPA Midstream Association

•  Monitored responsibly sourced gas (RSG) market developments and engaged key customers on potential RSG Partnerships

LOGO

Investment in
Emissions Data
Collection

•  Conducted an Emissions Digitalization pilot at Herradura Compressor Station to improve accuracy and availability of emissions data

•  Implemented an industry-leading software platform to enhance our emissions data frequency

LOGO

Investment
in Climate
Technology

•  Assess next generation methane technology

•  Continue to install solar panels to power meter stations across our pipeline assets

LOGO

Industry and
Trade Group
Participation
and Leadership

•  Continued participation in ONE Future, The Environmental Partnership and the EIC/GPA ESG Working Group to proactively further the energy industry into a more sustainable future

•  SVP, ESG and Corporate Communications sits on the ONE Future Board

•  Continued senior leadership participation in industry conferences ensuring the continued collaboration and discussion around carbon management in the energy sector

30LOGO


Sustainability and ESG

Recognized as an ESG Leader – Highly rated by multiple agencies

LOGO

A Rating

LOGO

Ranks in the

6th percentile

in the Refiners and Pipelines industry group

Corporate Knights

Ranks

33

out of 400 companies in Oil and Gas sector

LOGO

57.46

Our Sustainability Disclosure

Crestwood provides its stakeholders with transparent reporting on ESG performance. Our 2021 Sustainability Report — our 4th annual — follows best practices in sustainability reporting and provides detailed disclosure of our ESG performance. Our sustainability reporting is in accordance with the following frameworks:

LOGOLOGOLOGO

Our 2022 sustainability report is on track for an early June 2023 issuance.

We welcome your feedback on how to improve the value of our ESG disclosure:

Sustainability@crestwoodlp.com

For more information on Crestwood’s approach to sustainability, please visit:

https://esg.crestwoodlp.com

Disclaimer: Crestwood’s sustainability report is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

LOGO31


A Focus on Sustainability and ESG Performance

Crestwood’s ESG Journey: 2018-2022

While we have always had ESG ingrained in our values, Crestwood formalized its ESG governance framework in September 2018, which included establishing a Sustainability Committee and dedicated ESG function to provide oversight and integrate sustainability further into the organization.

LOGO

32LOGO


Sustainability and ESG

Human Capital Management

Crestwood knows that it is crucial that we continue to attract and retain talent.Through our diverse and inclusive workplace, our comprehensive compensation and benefits, our career management, and our focus on health, safety and employee wellbeing, we strive to holistically support our employees.

LOGO

Our innovation stems from the diverse perspectives, knowledge, and experiences of our employees. We strive to create an inclusive workplace where all employees are treated with dignity and respect. Our commitment to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) starts at the top with a highly skilled and diverse Board. Of our directors, 33% are female. As of December 31, 2022, of our 753 employees, women represented 31% of Crestwood’s full-time females in management and 21% of full-time employees. Our Sustainability Committee at the board-level has oversight of our DEI programs.

LOGOLOGOLOGO

LOGO33


Sustainability and ESG      

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Key Highlights

In 2022, and continuing into 2023, we have committed to furthering DEI at Crestwood.

Highlights include:

Continued to implement strategic elements outlined in Crestwood’s DEI five-point plan

Crestwood’s executive DEI Council met quarterly to continue to provide strategic council to our DEI strategy

Progressed on diversity hiring initiatives

Conducted cultural indigenous awareness training to all Arrow asset employees and supporting corporate members

DEI training tied to employee and executive compensation

Continued to monitor pay equity, including gender, race and age

Implemented a DEI floating holiday in 2023

Plan to publish EEO-1 Report in Q3 2023

51% of our social investment was donated to organizations advancing DEI in our communities

Approximately 60% of all interns and 60% of all scholarship recipients are from diverse backgrounds

Included in the Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index for a third consecutive year; only one of three midstream companies to be included in the Index

LOGO

34LOGO


  Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Introduction

We do not directly employ any of the persons responsible for managing the Partnership. The General Partner currently manages our operations and activities, and its board of directors (i.e. the Board) and officers make decisions on our behalf. The compensation of the directors and the executive officers of the General Partner is determined by the Board based on the recommendations112,221,849 outstanding voting units, which, as of our Compensation Committee.

All of the executive officers of the Partnership also serve in the same capacities as executive officers of the Partnership’s subsidiaries and the compensation of the named executive officers (“NEOs”) discussed below reflects total compensation for services to all Crestwood entities described in more detail below.

For purposes of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis our NEOs for Fiscal 2022 were comprised of:

LOGO

Robert G. Phillips,

Founder, Chairman,

Chief Executive

Officer

(Principal Executive

Officer)

LOGO

Robert T. Halpin,

President

LOGO

John W. Black,

Executive Vice

President, Chief

Financial Officer

(Principal

Financial Officer)

LOGO

William H. Moore,

Executive Vice

President,

Corporate Strategy

LOGO

Steven M. Dougherty,

Executive Vice

President, Chief

Accounting Officer

LOGO

Joel C. Lambert,

Executive Vice

President,

Chief Legal,

Compliance and

Safety Officer

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

We employ a compensation philosophy that emphasizes pay for performance. The primary measure of our long-term performanceSeptember 22, 2023, is total shareholder return (TSR). We believe that by tying a substantial portion of each NEO’s total compensation to financial, operational and safety performance metrics that support TSR, our pay-for-performance approach aligns the interests of our executive officers with that of our unitholders. Accordingly, the objectives of our total compensation program consist of:

aligning executive compensation incentives with the creation of unitholder value;

balancing short-term and long-term performance;

tying short-term and long-term compensation to the achievement of performance objectives (company, business unit, department and/or individual); and

attracting and retaining the best possible executive talent for the benefit of our unitholders.

By accomplishing these objectives, we intend to optimize long-term unitholder value.

LOGO35


Executive Compensation

Recent Developments

In 2022 the Compensation Committee conduced a comprehensive review of our compensation program to identify areas of focus to better align our compensation program with the long-term interests of our unitholders. Based on that review, the Compensation Committee took the following actions:

  Areas of FocusCompensation Committee Action
  Single-Trigger Change of Control   Benefits

  Amended LTIP to eliminate single-trigger Change of Control benefits effective January 1, 2023  

  Insufficient Clawback Policy

  Clawback Policy approved November 2022

  Executive Unit Ownership   Requirements

  Executive Unit Ownership Guidelines approved in November 2022  

  Similar Metrics in STIP and LTIP

  Approved 2023 performance unit metrics to eliminate overlap with STIP metrics

  Non-routine Equity Awards

  No non-routine equity awards were made to any NEO in 2022  

  Compensation at Risk

  CEO’s mix of performance units increased to 50% of 2023 grant

Compensation Setting Process

Performance Evaluation

For the CEO, in Fiscal 2022, the Board met in executive session without management present to review the CEO’s performance in the areas of financial results, operational safety and efficiency, progress against ESG and sustainability goals, and leadership team development, among other areas of focus designed to align with increasing long-term unitholder value. In this session, the Board also reviewed:

Evaluations of the CEO completed by the Board members;

The CEO’s written assessment of his own performance compared with the stated goals;

Business performance of the Partnership relative to established targets;

Management’s achievement of several key strategic transactions throughout the year; and

The Compensation Committee used these evaluations and competitive market data to determine the CEO’s compensation. For all NEOs except the CEO, the Compensation Committee reviewed the CEO’s recommendations, including supporting market data, and individual performance assessments. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviewed the reasonableness of the CEO’s pay recommendations for NEOs based on a competitive market study that included proxy and annual report data from the approved comparator peer group and published compensation survey data (discussed further below). Based on this input, the Compensation Committee determined compensation for the other NEOs. The Board then reviewed and ratified all aspects of executive compensation based on the reports and recommendations from the Compensation Committee.

Role of CEO and Management

In setting compensation, the Board and the Compensation Committee rely on the CEO and management for certain inputs into its process. Our compensation consultant provides the

36LOGO


Executive Compensation

compensation committee and the CEO with data from the annual proxy statements and annual reports of companies in our comparator peer group, along with pay information compiled from nationally recognized executive and industry-related compensation surveys. Our CEO and compensation consultant then use this data to analyze pay practices among companies in the comparator peer group in order to assist the Compensation Committee in its assessment the market as a whole. The CEO also:

assists in helping the Compensation Committee establish business performance goals and objectives;

provides the Compensation Committee his evaluation of executive officer and company performance;

recommends compensation levels and awards for executive officers other than himself; and

implements the Compensation Committee approved compensation plans.

Our CEO makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to financial metrics to be used and determination of performance for performance-based awards. He also makes recommendations regarding non-CEO executive compensation, which may be based on our performance, individual performance and the peer group compensation market analysis. The Compensation Committee considers these recommendations when establishing the total compensation packages of our executive officers.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

Willis Towers Watson serves as our third-party compensation consultant. Our Compensation Committee believes it is beneficial to have a third-party analysis to assist in evaluating and setting executive compensation. The Compensation Committee, in consultation with management, chose Willis Towers Watson based on its extensive experience in providing executive compensation advice, including specific experience in the oil and gas industry. For Fiscal 2022, Willis Towers Watson provided the Compensation Committee with an analysis of our executive compensation programs, including total direct compensation comprised of base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation, in order to assess the competitiveness of our programs and to provide conclusions and recommendations. Our Compensation Committee has taken and will take into consideration the discussions, guidance and compensation studies produced by our compensation consultant to make compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of the compensation consultant and has concluded that the compensation consultant’s work for the Compensation Committee does not raise any conflict of interest.

Competitive Benchmarking and Peer Group

Our Compensation Committee considers competitive industry data in making executive pay determinations. Pursuant to our Compensation Committee’s decisions to maintain a peer group for executive compensation purposes and in view of evolving industry and competitive conditions, Willis Towers Watson, with the assistance of management, proposed certain peer group companies for our Compensation Committee’s review.

LOGO37


Executive Compensation

After discussion with Willis Towers Watson and reviewing its recommendation of a peer group based on companies with annual revenues, assets and net income similar to ours and taking into account geographic footprint and employee count, our Compensation Committee determined that the peer group listed below was the most appropriate for purposes of the 2022 executive compensation analysis.

  MPLX, LP

  Magellan Midstream Partners, LP

  Targa Resources Corporation

  Sprague Resources, LP

  The Williams Companies, Inc.

  Genesis Energy, LP

  DCP Midstream, LP

  Equitrans Midstream Corporation

  NGL Energy Partners, LP

  NuStar Energy, LP

  EnLink Midstream, LLC

  Antero Midstream Corporation

  Western Midstream Partners, LP

  Summit Midstream Partners, LP

  Enable Midstream Partners, LP

Willis Towers Watson compiled compensation data for the peer group from a variety of sources, including proxy statements and other publicly filed documents, and compiled published survey compensation data from multiple sources. This compensation data was then presented to the Compensation Committee and used to compare the compensation of our NEOs to our peer group where the peer group had individuals serving in similar positions and to the market. The Compensation Committee generally strives to maintain target base salary and short-term incentives in the range of the 50th percentile of market. Provided management maintains a high level of performance, executes well against Partnership goals, and creates long term value for unitholders, the Compensation Committee targets expected long-term incentive opportunities in the range of the 75th percentile of market.

Components of Compensation

Fixed PayBase Salary

Fixed level of compensation to attract and retain executive talent. Salary level based on tenure, expertise, scope of responsibility and individual performance

“At Risk” Pay   Annual Incentive
Program (Cash)

  Incentivize and reward executives for achieving the Company’s financial, operational, safety and sustainability goals

  Encourage smart investments and prudent deployment of capital

  Attract, motivate, and retain high quality management talent

  Provide competitive cash compensation opportunity

Performance
Units

  Recognizes the Company’s total shareholder performance relative to industry peers

  Links the Company’s performance to long-term unitholder value creation

  Provides a long-term incentive vehicle tied to three-year performance goals

Restricted Units

  Aligns interests of executives with unitholders by providing long-term unit ownership

  Provides forfeitable ownership stake (three-year ratable vesting) to encourage retention

38LOGO


Executive Compensation

Base Salary

Base salary is designed to compensate executives commensurate with the level of the position they hold and for sustained individual performance (including experience, scope of responsibility, results achieved and potential). Base salaries for our NEOs are reviewed on an annual basis and at the time of promotion or other change in responsibilities. In determining the amount of any adjustments, the Compensation Committee uses market data as a tool for assessing the reasonableness of the base salary amounts of the NEOs as compared to the compensation of executives in similar positions with similar responsibility levels in our industry. However, the final determination of base salary amounts was within the Compensation Committee’s discretion. The annual base salaries for our NEOs are as follows: Mr. Phillips ($800,000), Mr. Halpin ($600,000), Mr. Black ($400,000), Mr. Dougherty ($450,000), Mr. Lambert ($470,000) and Mr. Moore ($425,000).

In connection with Mr. Black’s promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer in August 2022, his base salary was increased from $360,000 to $400,000. This amount was determined by reviewing the market data for comparable executive officer roles at our peer companies.

For 2023 the Compensation Committee accepted management’s recommendation to make no other changes to the NEOs base salary.

Annual Incentive Awards

Incentive bonuses are granted based on a percentage of each NEO’s base salary. Incentive awards are designed to reward the performance of key employees, including the NEOs, by providing annual incentive opportunities for the Partnership’s achievement of its annual financial, operational, and individual performance goals. These bonus awards are provided to the NEOs in order to provide competitive incentives to these individuals who can significantly impact performance and promote achievement of our short-term business objectives.

LOGO39


Executive Compensation

The annual target bonus amounts of our NEOs are reviewed on an annual basis and at the time of promotion or other change in responsibilities. In determining the amount of any adjustments, the Compensation Committee uses market data as a tool for assessing the reasonableness of the annual incentive targets of the NEOs as compared to executives in similar positions with similar responsibility levels in our industry. However, the final determination of annual target bonus amounts is within the Compensation Committee’s discretion.

($ in millions)

2022
Target
2022
Actuals

Percentage

Achieved

WeightWeighted
Achievement

Consolidated Distributable Cash Flow per Common Unit

$5.50$4.63 85% 30% 26%

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA

$805$762 58% 30% 17%

Total Shareholder Return Relative to Peers

 100% 27% 27% 10% 3%

Safety

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Recordable Incident Rate

 1.10 1.03 107% 4% 4%

Days Away Restricted Transferred Rate

 0.75 0.51 132% 4% 5%

Preventable Vehicle Incident Rate

 1.25 0.89 129% 4% 5%

Safety and Compliance Leading Indicators

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Near Miss Reports

 1,300 2,235 140% 4% 6%

Safety, Ethics, HR, IT Training Completed On-Time

 99.5% 100.0% 140% 4% 6%

Sustainability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Methane Emissions Intensity (metric Tons per Mscf throughput)

 0.046% 0.042% 110% 2% 2%

LDAR Conducted for Facilities with Methane Emission Sources

 75% 100% 140% 2% 3%

Indigenous Cultural Awareness Training Completed

 99% 100% 140% 2% 3%

D&I Representation in Scholarship and Internship Program

 60% 60 100% 2% 2%

Community Engagement—Volunteer Hours

 2,000 2,847 140% 2% 3%

Total Achievement

 100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 85%

Actual annual incentive awards for 2022 were determined based on our achievement of Compensation Committee approved key performance indicators (“KPIs”) and a board discretionary component. The KPIs for Fiscal 2022 were distributable cash flow per common unit, adjusted EBITDA, total shareholder return relative to peers, safety, and sustainability. Each KPI is then weighted based on the relative impact to our overall compensation philosophy and objectives. Actual results between the minimum and maximum target thresholds are pro-rated based on the percentage of target reached. Actual results above the maximum threshold are capped at 140% and results below 40% achievement result in 0% achievement for that KPI, excluding total unitholder return relative to peers.

Based on the company’s KPI achievement, the annual incentive bonus pool for Fiscal 2022 was calculated at 85% of target.

40LOGO


Executive Compensation

Individual Performance

Historically, after adjustments for KPI achievement, the actual bonus amount paid to the individual NEO is then further adjusted based on the individual performance review for such NEO. While 2022 was a year of exceptional strategic achievement, our 2022 financial and operating results, at 85% of target KPIs, were below plan and investor expectations due to a wide range of factors. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee accepted management’s recommendation that, except for William Moore, the NEOs’ annual incentive payouts, relative to target bonus, should not exceed the plan achievement of 85%. Mr. Moore’s incentive multiplier was 110% of target due to his leadership in realigning our midstream portfolio by expanding our operations in the Williston and Delaware Basins, while divesting our non-core Barnett and Marcellus assets.

Some of the factors that impact an individual performance review of an NEO include: (i) whether or not we achieved the goals established for the year and any notable shortfalls relative to expectations; (ii) the level of difficulty associated with achieving such objectives based on the opportunities and challenges encountered during the year; (iii) current year operating and financial performance relative to both public guidance and prior year’s performance; (iv) significant transactions or accomplishments for the period not included in the goals for the year; (v) our relative prospects at the end of the year with respect to future growth and performance; and (vi) our equity price performance and returns during the year and our positioning at the end of the year with respect to our targeted leverage metrics and credit profile.

During 2022, the executive leadership team successfully led the organization through a very challenging and unprecedented year and worked closely to achieve the vast majority of the goals set at the beginning of the year.

The 2022 annual incentive cash payouts were as follows:

Name

  2022 Base
Salary ($)
  Target
Bonus (%)
 

Target

Bonus ($)

  Percentage
Multiplier
 Total ($) 

Robert G. Phillips

    800,000    125%   1,000,000    85%   850,000 

Robert T. Halpin

    600,000    120%   720,000    85%   612,000 

John W. Black

    400,000    90%   360,000    85%   306,000 

William H. Moore

    425,000    100%   425,000    110%   467,500 

Steven M. Dougherty

    450,000    90%   405,000    85%   344,250 

Joel C. Lambert

    470,000    90%   423,000    85%   359,550 

Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards

Long-term incentive awards for the NEOs are granted under the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) to promote achievement of our primary long-term strategic business objective of increasing TSR. This plan was designed to align the economic interests of key employees and directors with those of our unitholders and to provide an incentive to management for continuous employment with the Partnership. Long-term incentive compensation is based upon the common units representing limited partnership interests in us. For Fiscal 2022, awards under the LTIP consisted of: (i) the standard annual grant of restricted units and (ii) performance unit awards.

Annual Restricted Unit Awards

The initial annual long-term equity incentive targets for our NEOs were established in their Employment Agreements. For a more detailed description of the Executive Employment Agreements, see “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table — Employment Agreements” in this proxy statement. The annual target long-term equity incentives for our NEOs are reviewed on an annual basis and at the time of promotion or

LOGO41


Executive Compensation

other changes in responsibilities. In determining the amount of any adjustments, the Compensation Committee uses market data as a tool for assessing the reasonableness of long-term incentive targets of the NEOs as compared to executives in similar positions with similar responsibility levels in our industry. However, the final determination of long-term equity awards is within the Compensation Committee’s discretion. The following annual restricted unit awards were made to our NEOs in 2022:

Name

  Target Equity
Percentage of Base
Salary
 2022 Annual
Restricted Units
Awarded(1)(2)
  Value at Grant 
Date ($) 

Robert G. Phillips

    400%   115,984    3,235,954 

Robert T. Halpin

    275%   59,804    1,668,532 

John W. Black(3)

    150%   18,757    523,320 

William H. Moore

    225%   34,659    966,986 

Steven M. Dougherty

    260%   42,407    1,183,155 

Joel C. Lambert

    250%   42,588    1,188,205 

(1)

The annual restricted unit grants pay cash distributions in the same amount that would be payable to the holder of common units.

(2)

The annual restricted unit awards vest ratably over a three-year period (one-third on each anniversary of the grant date), subject to continued employment through the applicable vesting date. We believe this vesting schedule appropriately encourages continued employment with the Partnership while allowing our NEOs to realize compensation in line with the value they have created for our unitholders.

(3)

In connection with Mr. Black’s promotion to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer in August 2022, his total target equity percentage for his restricted and performance grants was increased to 240% of his base salary.

Performance Units

In addition to the annual restricted unit grants, our NEOs are eligible to receive performance unit awards. In Fiscal 2022, each of our NEOs received a grant of performance units. These performance units vest over a three-year performance period and are paid out based on a performance multiplier ranging between 50% and 200%, with the determination based on the actual performance in the third year of the performance period compared to pre-established performance goals. The performance goals were based on achieving a specified level of adjusted EBITDA, distributable cash flow per unit, and three-year relative total shareholder return, based on the Partnership’s percentile ranking as compared with companies that are contained in the Alerian MLP Index at the time the goals were set. The Compensation Committee selected these metrics because we believe these are the key value indicators for our unitholders and will most closely align the interests of our NEOs with those of our unitholders. The Compensation Committee then weighted the three performance measures as follows:

Performance Unit Metric

  Weighting 50% Payout  100% Payout  200% Payout 

Adjusted EBITDA

  35% $805  $885  $965 

Distributable Cash Flow per Unit

  35% $5.65  $6.00  $6.35 

Total Unitholder Return

  30%  25th Percentile   50th Percentile   75th Percentile 

For all performance unit grants, the last year of the respective performance period is used to measure whether the performance goal is achieved. The payout multiplier for performance equal to or greater than the threshold is determined on a linear scale between performance levels. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to revise the performance unit metrics based on any mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures that occur during the performance period.

In making the 2022 performance unit grants to our NEOs, the Compensation Committee considered peer benchmarking data specific to each NEO and each NEO’s contribution to our long-term growth.

42LOGO


Executive Compensation

Based on this analysis, the Compensation Committee approved the following grants of performance units to our named executive officers on December 10, 2021:

Name

  Performance Units  

Value at 

Grant Date ($) 

  Minimum (#)  Target (#)  Maximum (#)

Robert G. Phillips

    32,751         65,502         131,004         2,052,040      

Robert T. Halpin

    10,008         20,015         40,030         627,035      

John W. Black

    1,883         3,766         7,532         117,983      

William H. Moore

    10,440         20,879         41,758         654,100      

Steven M. Dougherty

    6,141         12,282         24,564         384,775      

Joel C. Lambert

    9,553         19,105         38,210         598,527      

The performance units are entitled to partnership distributions in the same amount that would be payable to the holder of common units. However, distributions paid on performance units are paid in additional performance units in lieu of cash and such additional performance units are subject to the same performance, vesting and forfeiture provisions as the original performance units. For performance units granted in 2022, the value of the distributions is converted into units each quarter based on the closing price of CEQP units on the payment date.

For its performance unit awards made in February 2023, the Compensation Committee set performance unit metrics at distributable cash flow per unit (35% weighting), total unitholder return (40% weighting), and debt to EBITDA leverage ratio (25% weighting). The Compensation Committee also set the CEO’s long-term incentive award to 50% performance units and 50% restricted units. The Compensation Committee expects to adjust the mix of long-term incentive plan awards to the same 50% performance unit mix for the remainder of the NEOs over the next few years.

Other Compensation Related Matters

Benefits & Perquisites

We offer a variety of health and welfare and retirement programs to all eligible employees. The NEOs are eligible for these programs on the same basis as other employees. We maintain a 401(k) retirement plan that provides eligible employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis. We match 6% of the deferral to the retirement plan (not to exceed the maximum amount permitted by law) made by eligible participants. Our named executive officers are also eligible to participate in additional employee benefits available to our other employees.

We do not provide significant perquisites or other personal benefits to the NEOs beyond incidental, personal use of the corporate aircraft and, for the CEO only, certain membership dues for business purposes only.

Crestwood maintains a corporate aircraft that is used primarily for business travel by our executive officers. We have a written policy that sets forth guidelines and procedures regarding personal use of this aircraft. With respect to the Summary Compensation Table, Crestwood values the cost of the benefit at the incremental cost to Crestwood of providing such benefits. The primary purpose of Crestwood’s corporate aircraft is for business and, as a result, the incremental costs associated with personal use of such items does not include fixed costs that do not change based on usage, including limited family accompaniment or use in connection with an executive’s business use. To the extent we do not incur any incremental costs, no additional compensation is included as part of the total compensation of our named executive officers. However, any incremental costs that we do incur and that are incidental to the business use of such items are included in such total. In the case of personal use of corporate aircraft (including, for example, for travel to outside board

LOGO43


Executive Compensation

meetings), the amount reported is the incremental cost of providing the benefit, which primarily includes fuel costs and airport costs as well as any incidental costs for the crew.

Tax Considerations

With respect to the deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code, we are a limited partnership and do not meet the definition of a “corporation” under Section 162(m). Thus, the compensation that we pay to our employees is not subject to the deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Anti-Hedging Policy

Under our trading policies, directors, executive officers, and other employees, as well as persons sharing their households or their designees, are prohibited from engaging in any speculative, hedging, or derivative security transaction that primarily involves or references CEQP securities.

Clawback Policy

In November 2022, the Compensation Committee approved a Clawback Policy. The Clawback Policy provides that, in the event the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws, the Company will recover (on a pre-tax basis) the amount of incentive-based compensation received by its current and former executive officers in excess of the amount of incentive-based compensation that would have been received had it been determined based on the restated amount, subject to limited exceptions.

Common Unit Ownership Guidelines for Executives

The Company adopted common unit ownership guidelines for its executive officers on January 1, 2023. The guidelines are intended to align the interests of the Company’s executive officers and the Company’s unitholders by requiring executives to accumulate and retain a meaningful amount of the Company’s common units. Under the guidelines, the executive officers must comply with the following minimum ownership requirements:

Officer Level

Ownership Guidelines

Chief Executive Officer

5x annual base salary

Other Executive Officers

3x annual base salary

Common units that count toward satisfaction of these Guidelines include: (i) common units owned directly by the executive officer or director; (ii) common units owned indirectly by the executive officer or director (e.g, by a spouse or other immediate family member residing in the same household or a trust for the benefit of the executive officer or director or his or her family), whether held individually or jointly; (iii) common units granted under the Company’s long-term incentive plans. Unvested and unearned performance units do not count towards compliance guidelines. All of the NEOs are currently in compliance with the Company’s ownership guidelines.

Unitholder Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

As described above in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section of this proxy statement, we believe our compensation program is effective, appropriate and strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our unitholders and that the total compensation provided to the NEOs (including potential payouts upon a termination or change of control) is reasonable and not excessive. As you consider this proposal, we urge you to read the CD&A section of this proxy statement for additional details on executive compensation, including the more detailed information about our compensation philosophy and objectives, and to review the tabular disclosures regarding NEO compensation together with the accompanying narrative disclosures in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement.

44LOGO


Executive Compensation

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2012, as well as Section 14A of the Exchange Act, and the rules promulgated thereunder, enables our unitholders the opportunity to express their views, on an advisory basis, on the compensation of the named executive officers. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of the named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement.

As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding on the Board or the Compensation Committee, will not overrule any decisions made by the Board or the Compensation Committee or require the Board or the Compensation Committee to take any action. Although the vote is non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our unitholders and will carefully consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions. In particular, to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officers’ compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our unitholders’ concerns, and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee, which is composed solely of independent members of the Board of Directors, assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to, among other things, establishing and reviewing compensation of the Partnership’s executive officers. The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Partnership’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis and, based on the review and discussion, recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee

Clay C. Williams (Chair)

Angela A. Minas

Frances M. Vallejo

LOGO45


Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth for the year ended December 31, 2022, the compensation reportable for the named executive officers, as determined by SEC rules.

2022 Summary Compensation Table

Name and

Principal Position

 Fiscal
Year
 Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Unit
Awards
($)(1)
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(2)
 Total ($)

Robert G. Phillips

Chief Executive Officer
and Director

   2022   800,000      5,287,994   850,000   102,839   7,040,833
   2021   800,000      5,581,674   2,000,000   158,404   8,540,078
   2020   829,807      4,783,070   1,200,000   153,409   6,966,286

Robert T. Halpin

President

   2022   600,000      2,295,567   612,000   32,601   3,540,168
   2021   500,000      2,052,504   1,000,000   50,985   3,603,489
   2020   517,884      2,314,193   600,000   21,402   3,453,479

John W. Black

Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer

   2022   365,625      641,303   306,000   18,354   1,331,282

William H. Moore

Executive Vice President,
Corporate Strategy

   2022   425,000      1,621,086   467,500   38,643   2,552,229
   2021   395,000      1,573,701   790,000   20,108   2,778,809
   2020   409,807      1,716,894   474,000   20,266   2,620,967

Steven M. Dougherty

Executive Vice President,
Chief Accounting Officer

   2022   450,000      1,567,930   344,250   18,714   2,380,894
   2021   435,000      1,509,706   783,000   21,747   2,749,453
   2020   451,230      1,555,474   469,800   24,222   2,500,726

Joel C. Lambert

Executive Vice President,
Chief Legal, Compliance
and Safety Officer

   2022   470,000      1,786,732   359,550   18,714   2,634,996
   2021   470,000      1,706,269   740,250   44,365   2,960,884
   2020   486,730      1,578,347   507,600   22,902   2,595,579

(1)

The material terms of our outstanding LTIP awards are described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards.” Unit award amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of unit awards granted during the periods. For performance units granted in 2021, the value of the distributions is converted into units each quarter based on the closing price of CEQP units on the payment date and this value is included in the total unit awards amounts. See Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, Note 13 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year December 31, 2022 for more information.

(2)

All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year 2022 consisted of the following:

Name

  401(k) Matching
Contributions ($)
  Group Term Life
Insurance ($)
  Other ($)(1)(2)  Total ($)

Robert G. Phillips

    18,300    2,286    82,253    102,839

Robert T. Halpin

    18,300    162    14,139    32,601

John W. Black

    18,300    54        18,354

William H. Moore

    18,300    60    20,283    38,643

Steven M. Dougherty

    18,300    414        18,714

Joel C. Lambert

    18,300    414        18,714

(1)

Represents the incremental cost to the Partnership for the personal use of the Partnership’s aircraft and other personal benefits. Aircraft benefits are determined by applying the SIFL milage rates published by the DOL to executives’ personal use. In 2022, Messrs. Phillips, Halpin and Moore had $46,257, $14,139, and $20,284 respectively in personal aircraft use.

46LOGO


Executive Compensation

(2)

Mr. Phillips received reimbursements for membership dues in the amount of $24,210 for a country club, and $4,149 for a dining club. Incremental expenses related to these organizations are primarily for business purposes.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2022

Name

 Grant
Date
  

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(1)

  

 

Estimated Future Payout
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)

  All Other
Unit
Awards
(#)(3)
  Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Unit and
Option
Awards
($)(4)
 
 Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
 

Robert G. Phillips

  01/05/22         115,984   3,235,954 
  02/14/22   800,000   1,000,000   1,400,000   32,751   65,502   131,004    2,052,040 

Robert T. Halpin

  01/05/22         59,804   1,668,532 
  02/14/22   600,000   720,000   1,008,000   10,008   20,015   40,030    627,035 

John W. Black

  01/05/22         18,757   523,320 
  02/14/22   400,000   360,000   504,000   1,883   3,766   7,532    117,983 

William H. Moore

  01/05/22         34,659   966,986 
  02/14/22   425,000   425,000   595,000   10,440   20,879   41,758    654,100 

Steven M. Dougherty

  01/05/22         42,407   1,183,155 
  02/14/22   450,000   405,000   567,000   6,141   12,282   24,564    384,775 

Joel C. Lambert

  01/05/22         42,588   1,188,205 
  02/14/22   470,000   423,000   592,200   9,553   19,105   38,210    598,527 

(1)

Actual amounts paid pursuant to the annual incentive bonus are reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)

Represents grants of performance units granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. The vesting of the performance units is subject to the attainment of pre-established performance goals based on adjusted EBITDA, distributable cash flow per unit and total shareholder return relative to the Alerian MLP Index during the third year of a three-year fiscal period. The amounts in the table reflect the grant date fair value of the performance unit awards.

(3)

Represents grants of restricted units granted under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. For each NEO, the restricted unit awards granted on January 5, 2022 will vest ratably (33.33%) over a three-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.

(4)

Unit award amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of unit awards granted during 2022. See Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, Note 13 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 for a discussion of the assumptions used to determine the value of the awards.

LOGO47


Executive Compensation

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Employment Agreements

The Executive Employment Agreements provide for the base salary, target bonus amounts and a target equity compensation grant described in our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Under the terms of the Executive Employment Agreements, if the named executive officer’s employment is terminated during the initial term or a subsequent one-year renewal by Crestwood Operations, LLC (“Crestwood Operations”) without “employer cause” or the executive resigns due to “employee cause” or the named executive officer’s employment with Crestwood Operations terminates as a result of Crestwood Operations’ election not to renew the Executive Employment Agreement or due to the executive’s death or permanent disability, the executive will be entitled to receive, subject to the executive’s execution of a release of claims, severance equal to two (or, in the case of Mr. Phillips, three) times the sum of (i) outstanding Common Units and (ii) 7,125,745 Common Units underlying the executive’s base salary and average annual bonus for the prior two years, payable in equal installments overPreferred Units, on an 18-month period following termination. In addition, the named executive officer would be entitled to certain subsidized medical benefits over such 18-month period. If the named executive officer fails to comply with covenants in the Executive Employment Agreement, the release of claims or similar agreement, he forfeits the right to receive any severance payment installments following such failure to comply.

On February 22, 2018, Crestwood Operations entered into an Omnibus Amendment to each Executive Employment Agreement (“Omnibus Amendment”). Pursuant to the Omnibus Amendment, if the employment of Messrs. Halpin, Moore, Dougherty or Lambert is terminated during the period beginning three months prior to a Change of Control and ending twelve months after a Change of Control, then the severance amount payable shall be increased to three times the sum of base salary and average annual bonus for the prior two years.

On January 6, 2023, Crestwood Operations entered into a 2023 Omnibus Amendment to each Executive Employment Agreement with each the NEOs (“Second Omnibus Amendment”). Pursuant to the Second Omnibus Amendment, equity awards issued on or after January 1, 2023, will not become vested in connection with a Change of Control (as defined in the Plan). Such awards will, however, become vested in connection with any termination by the Employer for reasons other than Employer Cause or any resignation by the employee due to Employee Cause (each as defined in the Executive Employment Agreement). The Second Omnibus Amendment also makes certain additional changes to the Executive Employment Agreements, including updating the definition of “Employee Cause” in each employment agreement to provide that a change in the employee’s reporting relationship will be a basis for resignation, clarifying the manner performance awards will become vested in connection with a termination by the Employer for reasons other than Employer Cause or resignation by the employee due to Employee Cause, and conforming the terms of the confidentiality provisions to comply with changes in applicable law.

For more information regarding potential severance and/or Change of Control payments for the NEOs, please see the section below titled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

48LOGO


Executive Compensationas-converted basis.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards and Units Vested

The following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards as of the end of Fiscal 2022 for the each of our NEOs (although as noted below, some of these awards may have vested prior to this filing). The table includes restricted units and performance units granted under the Crestwood Equity Partners LP Long Term Incentive Plan. The market value for CEQP units is based on the NYSE closing price of $26.19 on December 30, 2022.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End

  

Unit Awards

Name

 Restricted
Units That
Have Not
Vested
 Vest Date Market Value
of Units That
Have Not
Vested($)
 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested

(#)(1)

 Vest Date Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested ($)

Robert G. Phillips

   34,610   January 3, 2023   906,436   51,796   February 10, 2023   1,356,536
   38,661   January 5, 2023   1,012,532   30,000   February 16, 2024   785,700
   56,200   January 6, 2023   1,471,878   65,502   February 14, 2025   1,715,497
   38,661   January 5, 2024   1,012,532      
   30,000   January 6, 2024   785,700      
   56,200   January 6, 2024   1,471,878      
   38,022   December 27, 2024   995,796      
   38,662   January 5, 2025   1,012,558      

Robert T. Halpin

   16,223   January 2, 2023   424,880   13,813   February 10, 2023   361,762
   14,872   January 3, 2023   389,498   6,000   February 16, 2024   157,140
   19,934   January 5, 2023   522,071   20,015   February 14, 2025   524,193
   24,148   January 6, 2023   632,436      
   19,935   January 5, 2024   522,098      
   6,000   January 6, 2024   157,140      
   24,149   January 6, 2024   632,462      
   15,209   December 27, 2024   398,324      
   19,935   January 5, 2025   522,098      

John W. Black

   4,867   January 2, 2023   127,467   7,750   February 10, 2023   202,973
   3,353   January 3, 2023   87,815   3,766   February 14, 2025   98,632
   6,252   January 5, 2023   163,740      
   5,444   January 6, 2023   142,578      
   20,000   August 12, 2023   523,800      
   6,252   January 5, 2024   163,740      
   5,445   January 6, 2024   142,605      
   3,333   July 9, 2024   87,291      
   8,000   July 9, 2024   209,520      
   6,253   January 5, 2025   163,766      

LOGO49


Executive Compensation

  

Unit Awards

Name

 Restricted
Units That
Have Not
Vested
 Vest Date Market Value
of Units That
Have Not
Vested($)
 

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested

(#)(1)

 Vest Date Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
Value of
Unearned
Units That
Have Not
Vested ($)

William H. Moore

   16,223   January 2, 2023   424,880   10,360   February 10, 2023   271,328
   9,613   January 3, 2023   251,764   4,000   February 16, 2024   104,760
   11,553   January 5, 2023   302,573   20,879   February 14, 2025   546,821
   15,609   January 6, 2023   408,800      
   11,553   January 5, 2024   302,573      
   4,000   January 6, 2024   104,760      
   15,609   January 6, 2024   408,800      
   19,011   December 27, 2024   497,898      
   11,553   January 5, 2025   302,573      

Steven M. Dougherty

   8,112   January 2, 2023   212,453   10,360   February 10, 2023   271,328
   10,586   January 3, 2023   277,247   5,000   February 16, 2024   130,950
   14,135   January 5, 2023   370,196   12,282   February 14, 2025   321,666
   17,189   January 6, 2023   450,180      
   14,136   January 5, 2024   370,222      
   5,000   January 6, 2024   130,950      
   17,189   January 6, 2024   450,180      
   11,406   December 27, 2024   298,723      
   14,136   January 5, 2025   370,222      

Joel C. Lambert

   12,709   January 3, 2023   332,849   12,949   February 10, 2023   339,134
   14,196   January 5, 2023   371,793   5,000   February 16, 2024   130,950
   20,636   January 6, 2023   540,457   19,105   February 14, 2025   500,360
   14,196   January 5, 2024   371,793      
   5,000   January 6, 2024   130,950      
   20,636   January 6, 2024   540,457      
   11,406   December 27, 2024   298,723      
   14,196   January 5, 2025   371,793      

(1)

As described further in the CD&A section, the awards will vest on a combination of Adjusted EBITDA, Distributable Cash Flow per Unit and Total Unitholder Return, as determined over a three year period for each award as described below. Potential acceleration or forfeiture events are described in more detail below within the section titled “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

50LOGO


Executive Compensation

Units Vested in 2022

The following table provides information regarding restricted and performance units vesting during Fiscal 2022 for each of the NEOs. For the restricted units, the value realized on vesting was calculated by using the NYSE closing price of CEQP common units on the day immediately prior to the date that the award vested. For the performance units, the value realized on vesting was calculated by using the NYSE closing price of CEQP common units on the day the award vested.

   Unit Awards

Name

  

Number of Units

Acquired on Vesting

  

Value Realized

on Vesting ($)

Robert G. Phillips

    402,441    11,324,193

Robert T. Halpin

    127,518    3,585,190

John W. Black

    20,871    589,230

William H. Moore

    90,485    2,544,856

Steven M. Dougherty

    94,034    2,644,227

Joel C. Lambert

    114,982    3,233,226

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

None of the NEOs currently participate in the Crestwood Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.

Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change of Control

Termination and Change of Control Agreements or Arrangements

Under the terms of the Executive Employment Agreements, if the named executive officer’s employment is terminated during the initial term or a subsequent one-year renewal by Crestwood Operations without “employer cause” or the executive resigns due to “employee cause” or the named executive officer’s employment with Crestwood Operations terminates as a result of death, permanent disability, or Crestwood Operations’ election not to renew the Executive Employment Agreement, the executive will be entitled to receive, subject to the executive’s execution of a release of claims, severance equal to two (or, in the case of Mr. Phillips, three) times the sum of the executive’s base salary and average annual bonus for the prior two years, payable in equal installments over an 18-month period following termination. In addition, the named executive officer would be entitled to certain subsidized medical benefits over such 18-month period and all restricted units held by the named executive officer would vest in full. The vesting of the performance units would depend on how much of the original performance period remains outstanding.

Under the terms of the Executive Employment Agreements (other than Mr. Phillips), if the named executive officer is terminated during the period beginning three months prior to a Change of Control and ending twelve months after a Change of Control, then the severance amount payable shall be increased to three times the sum of his base salary and average annual bonus for the prior two years.

If the named executive officer fails to comply with covenants in the Executive Employment Agreement (such as non-compete restrictions), the release of claims or similar agreement, he forfeits the right to receive any severance payment installments following such failure to comply.

For purposes of the Executive Employment Agreements, the following terms are generally defined as follows:

“Employee Cause” will exist if one of the following occurs: (A) a substantial and continuing diminution in the nature of Employee’s responsibilities; (B) a material breach by Employer of any material provision of this Agreement; (C) a material and continuing reduction in the aggregated

LOGO51


Executive Compensation

total of Employee’s Base Salary, target term sheet bonus potential and target equity percentage; (D) a reassignment by the Company of the employee’s principal place of employment to a location more than 50 miles from his principal place of employment on the Effective Date, but excluding normal business travel consistent with Employee’s duties, responsibilities and position.

“Permanent Disability” shall mean the inability of Employee, with or without reasonable accommodation, by reason of illness, incapacity, or other disability, to perform Employee’s duties or fulfill Employee’s employment obligations to Employer, as determined by Employer’s Senior Executive Committee and as certified in writing by a competent medical physician chosen by such Senior Executive Committee, for a cumulative total of 180 days in any 12 month period; provided, however, that such period of absence may be extended if required by applicable law.

As of December 31, 2022, the restricted units and the performance units granted to our NEOs pursuant to the Crestwood Equity Long-Term Incentive Plan will receive accelerated vesting upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, or a termination due to a termination without cause. In August 2021, the plan was amended to modify the definition of a Change of Control, the new definition of which is defined below. With respect to any performance unit that is outstanding at the time of a Change of Control, the award will vest at different levels depending on how much of the original performance period remains outstanding. If there are less than twelve months left in the performance period, the awards will be calculated at actual performance levels; if there are more than twelve months left within the original performance period, the awards will be calculated using 100% of target levels. Effective as of January 1, 2023, we further amended the plan to eliminate accelerated vesting solely in the event of a Change of Control.

In the event that an NEO is terminated due to a death or disability, the restricted units and performance units will also be accelerated. Performance units will accelerate at 100% of target levels.

The new “Change of Control” definition is generally as follows: “Change of Control,” means and shall be deemed to have occurred upon one or more of the following events:

(i) any direct or indirect sale, lease, exchange, liquidation, division or other transfer (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all of the assets of the Partnership to any person or persons, other than to one or more Affiliates;

(ii) the consolidation, reorganization, merger, recapitalization, exchange, division or other similar transaction (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) (any such transaction or series of transactions referred to herein as a “Merger”) pursuant to which (a) more than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding equity interests in the General Partner or its successor entities cease to be owned, directly or indirectly, by the Partnership, (b) more than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding equity interests in the Partnership or its successor entities cease to be, directly or indirectly, owned immediately following the Merger by the owners of such interests immediately prior to the Merger, or (c) the General Partner or one or more other Affiliates of the Partnership cease to be general partner(s) of the Partnership or its successor;

(iii) a person or group other than the Partnership or its consolidated subsidiaries directly or indirectly becoming the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act) of more than 35% of the voting power of the then outstanding common units of the Partnership or its successor; or

(iv) individuals who, as of the date hereof, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board or of the board of directors or equivalent body of any successor parent of the Partnership or of the General Partner; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election or nomination for election by the Partnership’s unitholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board in the ordinary course of business shall be considered as though such individual was a member of the Incumbent Board, but

52LOGO


Executive Compensation

excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board or otherwise outside the ordinary course of business.

The terms “cause” and “disability” generally have the same meaning as the terms provided above with respect to the Executive Employment Agreements.

The following table presents information about the gross payments potentially payable to our named executive officers pursuant to the Executive Employment Agreements, assuming each such named executive officer experienced a qualifying termination of employment on December 31, 2022. The amounts that each NEO could receive separately upon a Change of Control event, without an accompanying termination of employment, pursuant to the accelerated vesting and settlement of awards pursuant to the Crestwood Equity Long-Term Incentive Plan are also listed separately in the table below. Each value is calculated using the closing market price of the units as of December 30, 2022, which was $26.19. Each of the amounts below reflect our best estimate of the amounts that could become payable to the NEOs pursuant to existing compensation arrangements but will not be fully determinable unless or until the triggering event were to take place.

   Phillips  Halpin  Dougherty  Lambert  Moore  Black(2)(3) 

Resignation without Employee Cause, Termination for Employer Cause, Retirement

                        

Accrued, unused vacation pay

 $61,538  $46,154  $34,615  $36,154  $32,692  $30,769 

TOTAL:

 $61,538  $46,154  $34,615  $36,154  $32,692  $30,769 

Resignation with Employee Cause,
Termination without Employer Cause,
Death or Permanent Disability

                        

Cash Severance

 $2,400,000  $1,200,000  $900,000  $940,000  $850,000  $800,000 

Average Annual Bonus

 $4,800,000  $1,600,000  $1,252,800  $1,247,850  $1,264,000  $588,160 

Accelerated Restricted Units

 $8,669,309  $4,201,007  $2,930,372  $2,958,816  $3,004,620  $1,812,322 

Accelerated Performance Units1

 $4,361,903  $1,177,530  $824,785  $1,096,480  $1,023,749  $377,052 

Benefit Continuation

 $25,618  $29,613  $29,619  $29,896  $29,619  $ 

Accrued, unused vacation pay

 $61,538  $46,154  $34,615  $36,154  $32,692  $30,769 

TOTAL:

 $20,318,368  $8,254,304  $5,972,191  $6,309,196  $6,204,680  $3,608,303 

Change of Control (Prior to January 1, 2023 Amendments)

 

        

Cash Severance

 $2,400,000  $1,800,000  $1,350,000  $1,410,000  $1,275,000  $800,000 

Average Annual Bonus

 $4,800,000  $2,400,000  $1,879,200  $1,871,775  $1,896,000  $588,160 

Accelerated Restricted Units

 $8,669,309  $4,201,007  $2,930,372  $2,958,816  $3,004,620  $1,812,322 

Accelerated Performance Units1

 $4,361,903  $1,177,530  $824,785  $1,096,480  $1,023,749  $377,052 

Benefit Continuation

 $25,618  $29,613  $29,619  $29,896  $29,619  $ 

Accrued, unused vacation pay

 $61,538  $46,154  $34,615  $36,154  $32,692  $30,769 

TOTAL:

 $20,318,368  $9,654,304  $7,048,591  $7,403,121  $7,261,680  $3,608,303 

LOGO53


Executive Compensation

1

All unvested Performance Unit Awards illustrated in table are accelerated at 100% or target, except the 2020 PUAs. The value for these awards in the table reflect actual performance achievement certified in February 2023, as prescribed in the employee agreements when there are fewer than 12 months to the restriction period ending on December 31.

2

Mr. Black’s Employment Agreement excludes subsidized medical benefits.

3

Mr. Black’s Cash Severance value is composed of 2 times salary and average annual bonus for the prior two years in a Change of Control termination, but increased to 3 times, effective January 1, 2023, as described in the 2023 Omnibus Amendment to Employee Agreements.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth in tabular format, a summary of CEQP’s equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2022:

Plan category

Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
Weighted-
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))

(a)(b)(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

$

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

$2,496,119

Total

$2,496,119

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

The Board adopted the Crestwood Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “NQDC”) in December 2016 and an employee unit purchase plan (the “Plan” and together with NQDC, the “Compensation Plans”) in August 2018, both of which are further described below. The Compensation Plans have not been approved by our unitholders. The Compensation Committee is the administrator of the Compensation Plans.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

Our Compensation Committee adopted the Crestwood Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan under which designated eligible participants may elect to defer compensation. Eligible participants include the executive officers, certain other senior officers and members of the Board.

Subject to applicable tax laws, the eligible executive and senior officers may elect to defer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 100% of incentive compensation earned and equity grants and the members of the Board may elect to defer up to 100% of their directors’ fees and equity grants. In addition to elective deferrals, the NQDC permits us to make matching contributions and discretionary contributions. Participants may elect to receive payment of their vested account balances in a single cash payment or in annual installments for a period of up to five years. Payments will be made on March 15 of any year at least one year after the deferral date, or upon separation from service. If a participant’s employment terminates before the designated year, payment is accelerated and paid in a lump sum. Compensation deferred under the Plan represents an unsecured obligation of the Partnership.

Currently, none of our NEOs or directors participate in the NQDC.

54LOGO


Executive Compensation

Employee Unit Purchase Plan

In August 2018, the Board approved an employee unit purchase plan (the “Plan”) under which employees of the General Partner may purchase common units through payroll deductions up to a maximum of 10% of the employees’ eligible compensation, not to exceed $25,000 for any calendar year. Under the Plan, we anticipate purchasing common units on the open market for the benefit of participating employees based on their payroll deductions. In addition, we may match up to 10% of participating employees’ payroll deductions to purchase additional common units for participating employees. The Board authorized 1,500,000 common units (subject to adjustment as provided in the Plan) to be available for purchase. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, 9,934, 9,932 and 29,784 common units were purchased under the Plan, respectively.

Pay Ratio Disclosure

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of our CEO.

We identified the median employee by examining 2022 cash compensation (including, but not limited to, salary and overtime earned, 401(k) employer matches and equity grants), for all individuals, including our CEO, who were employed on December 31, 2022. We included all fulltime, salaried and hourly employees. As of December 31, 2022, we employed 727 such persons. We annualized the compensation for any employees that were not employed for all of 2022, but did not make any other assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to total cash compensation or equity. Since all of our employees, including our CEO, are located in the United States, we did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the median employee. We believe the use of total cash and equity compensation for all employees is the most appropriate compensation measure since it includes the main elements of compensation for the majority of our employees.

After identifying the median employee, we calculated annual 2022 compensation for the median employee using the same methodology used to calculate the CEO’s total compensation as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above. The median employee’s annual 2022 compensation was as follows:

Name

 Year Salary Bonus Equity
Awards
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
 All Other
Compensation
 Total

Median Employee

 2022 $90,781 $0 $0 $14,583 $6,709 $112,073

With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our 2022 Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement, which was $7,040,833. Our 2022 ratio of Chief Executive Officer total compensation to our median employee’s total compensation is reasonably estimated to be 63:1.

LOGO55


Executive Compensation
Pay Versus Performance
The following table presents total compensation for our NEOs and
certain
financial performance measures for the last three completed fiscal years, which includes compensation information reported in the Summary Compensation Table to Compensation Actually Paid (CAP) in relation to Company performance. Compensation values in the Pay Versus Performance table are presented for the CEO alone and the average of other NEOs.
Pay Versus Performance Table
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO
($)(1)(4)
Compensation
Actually
Paid to PEO
($)(3)(4)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Totals
for
Non-PEO

NEOs
($)(2)(4)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to
Non-PEO

NEOs
($)(2)(3)(4)
Value of Initial Fixed
$100 Investment Based
On:
Net
Income
(Loss)
($)
Consolidated
Adjusted
EBITDA
($)(7)
Total
Shareholder
Return
($)(5)
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return
($)(6)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
2022   7,040,833    6,797,345    2,487,914    2,378,416    115.51    188.53    72,500,000    762,100,000 
         
2021   8,540,078    15,312,180    3,023,159    4,425,602    110.50    127.84    (37,400,000)   600,100,000 
         
2020   6,966,286    1,380,580    2,792,688    830,408    69.70    84.00    (15,300,000)   580,300,000 

(1)
Mr. Phillips
was the CEO for 2020, 2021 and 2022 and is designated as the principal executive officer (“PEO”).
(2)
Messrs. Halpin, Moore, Dougherty, Lambert were NEOs for 2020, 2021 and 2022. Mr. Black was appointed to NEO status in August 2022. He does not factor into the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) for years 2020 and 2021, but equity compensation values from 2020, 2021 and 2022 were included in the average CAP for
Non-PEO
NEOs.
(3)
CAP values for 2022 is calculated based on the aggregate value of: (a) Salary earnings; (b) Unit Awards granted in 2022 and their fair market values on December 31, 2022 (performance award grants with market conditions are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation estimate); (c)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan compensation earned in 2022 and paid in 2023; (d) All other Compensation consisting of benefits and perquisites shown in the SCT. CAP values for 2020 and 2021 used the same calculation methodology with an additional step for Unit Awards granted prior to 2022. For these grants, compensation was calculated considering actual vested values and any incremental value changes between the previous reporting year end between vesting or unvested units. CAP values illustrated in the table for the CEO and other NEOs is, therefore, combination of realized and estimated compensation not yet earned.
(4)
The tables below illustrate adjustments made to the SCT to arrive at the CAP values in the above table for both the CEO and other NEOs. Adjustments made to these values are confined to
year-end
differences between equity awards versus the grant date values of such awards reported in the SCT. No adjustments are made for dividend equivalent rights (DER) units or cash distributions on unvested units since these are considered a return of capital and captured in the fair value of awards. No Equity awards failed to meet vesting conditions during any of the reported years in the table.
PEO — Pay Versus Performance Reconciled to Summary Compensation Table (SCT)
Year
  
SCT
Total
($)
  
Equity Award
Deductions from
SCT
Total
($)
 
Equity Award
Adjustments
at Year End*
($)
  
CAP
Total
($)
2022    7,040,833     (5,287,994)      5,044,506         6,797,345  
     
2021    8,540,078     (5,581,674)      12,353,776         15,312,180 
     
2020    6,966,286     (4,783,070)      (
802,636
)   
     1,380,580 
56


Executive Compensation
PEO — * Equity award adjustment reconciliation
Year
  
Year-end Fair

Value of
Unvested Awards
Granted During
Year
($)
  
Year-over-year

Change in Fair
Value of
Outstanding
and Unvested
Equity Awards
($)
 
Year-over-year

Change in Fair
Value of Equity
Awards Granted in
Prior Years that
Vested in the Year
($)
 
Total
Equity
Award
Adjustments
($)
     
2022    4,839,185     22,883    182,438    5,044,506 
     
2021    7,314,943     4,985,057    53,776    12,353,776 
     
2020    3,048,755     (3,510,348)   (341,043)   (802,636)
Non-PEO NEOs — Pay Versus Performance Reconciled to Summary Compensation Table (SCT)
Year
  
SCT
Total
($)
  
Equity Award
Deductions from
SCT
Total
($)
  
Equity Award
Adjustments at
Year End*
($)
  
CAP
Total
($)
     
2022    2,487,914     (1,582,524)    1,473,026     2,378,416 
     
2021    3,023,159     (1,710,545)    3,112,988     4,425,602 
     
2020    2,792,688     (1,791,227)    (171,053)    830,408 
Non- PEO NEOs — * Equity Award Adjustment Reconciliation
Year
  
Year-end Fair

Value of
Unvested Awards
Granted During
Year
($)
  
Year-over-year

Change in Fair
Value of
Outstanding
and Unvested
Equity Awards
($)
  
Year-over-year

Change in Fair
Value of Equity
Awards Granted in
Prior Years that
Vested in the Year
($)
  
Total
Equity
Award
Adjustments
($)
     
2022    1,456,571     (39,817)    56,272     1,473,026 
     
2021    1,966,886     1,119,861     26,241     3,112,988 
     
2020    1,060,546     (1,168,873)    (62,726)    (171,053)
(5)
TSR is calculated on the value of an initial, fixed investment on January 1, 2020 of $100 in our common units at the end of each reporting year in the table, after considering distributions received by holders of our common units during each reporting year.
(6)Peer Group TSR is calculated on the value of an initial, fixed investment on January 1, 2020 of $100 in the common units of a group of our peer companies during 2020, 2021 and 2022 weighted based on their relative market capitalization during that period. TSR is calculated on a cumulative basis at the end of each reporting year in the table, after considering distributions received by holders of their common units during each reporting year. Our peers for the 2020 year consisted of WMB, NGL, DCP, ENBL, ENLC, ETRN, GEL, MMP, MPLX, NS, SMLP, SRLP, TRGP and WES. Our peers for the 2021 year consisted of TRGP, DCP, ENLC, MPLX, SRLP, ENBL, MMP, GEL, WMB, WES, NS, ETRN and SMLP. Our peers for the 2022 year consisted of TRGP, DCP, ENLC, MPLX, AM, MMP, GEL, WMB, WES, NS, ETRN, NGL and SMLP.
(7)
Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA is defined as income before income taxes, plus debt-related costs (interest and debt expense, net and gain (loss) on modification/extinguishment of debt) and depreciation, amortization and accretion expense (“EBITDA”), after considering the adjusted earnings impact of our unconsolidated affiliates by adjusting equity earnings or losses from our unconsolidated affiliates to reflect our proportionate share (based on the distribution percentage) of their EBITDA, excluding gains and losses on long-lived assets and other impairments. Adjusted EBITDA also considers the impact of certain significant items,
such as unit-based compensation charges, gains or losses and impairments on long-lived assets, impairments of goodwill, third party costs incurred related to potential and completed acquisitions, certain environmental remediation costs, the change in fair value of commodity inventory-related derivative contracts, costs associated with the realignment and restructuring of our operations and corporate structure, and other transactions identified in a specific reporting period. For more information about Adjusted EBITDA along with a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA, please see Item 7. Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2022.



57

Executive Compensation
LOGO
LOGO
LOGO
Tabular List of Most Important Performance Measures used to Link CAP to NEOs for the Most
Recently Completed Fiscal Year to Company Performance
Count
(1)
Measure (2)
Category
1Consolidated Adjusted EBITDAFinancial
2Consolidated Distributable Cash Flow Per UnitFinancial
3Return on Capital InvestedFinancial
4Total Unitholder Return (TSR)Financial
5SafetyNon-Financial
6SustainabilityNon-Financial
(1)Counts are provided for quantitative purposes only and do not imply or infer any ranking of one measure over the other.
(2)Safety and Sustainability are separate measures comprised of weighted subsets. See Annual Incentive Awards for constituent parts to these measures.
58


  Certain Relationships and Related Person

  Transactions


Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

Our related person transactions policy applies to any transaction since the beginning of our fiscal year (or currently proposed transaction) in which we or any of our subsidiaries was or is to be a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and any director, director nominee, executive officer, 5% or greater unitholder (or their immediate family members) had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A transaction that would be covered by this policy would include, but not be limited to, any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships.

Under our related person transactions policy, related person transactions may be entered into or continue only if the transaction is deemed to be “fair and reasonable” to us, in accordance with the terms of our Partnership Agreement. Under our Partnership Agreement, transactions that represent a “conflict of interest” may be approved in one of three ways and, if approved in any of those ways, will be considered “fair and reasonable” to us and the holders of our common units. The three ways enumerated in our related person transactions policy for reaching this conclusion include:

i.

approval by the Conflicts Committee under Section 7.9 of our Partnership Agreement (Special Approval);

ii.

approval by our Chief Executive Officer applying the criteria specified in Section 7.9 of our Partnership Agreement if the transaction is in the normal course of the Partnership’s business and is (a) on terms no less favorable to the Partnership than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties or (b) fair to the Partnership, taking into account the totality of the relationships between the parties involved (including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to the Partnership); and

iii.

approval by an independent committee of the Board (either the Audit Committee or a Special Committee) applying the criteria in Section 7.9 of our Partnership Agreement.

Once a transaction is approved in any of these ways, it is “fair and reasonable” and accordingly deemed (i) approved by all of our partners and (ii) not to be a breach of any fiduciary duties of the General Partner.

The General Partner determines in its discretion which method of approval is required depending on the circumstances.

Under our Partnership Agreement, when determining whether a related party transaction is “fair and reasonable,” if the General Partner elects to adopt a resolution or a course of action that has not received Special Approval, then the General Partner may consider:

the relative interests of any party to such conflict, agreement, transaction or situation and the benefits and burdens relating to such interest;

any customary or accepted industry practices and any customary or historical dealings with a particular person;

any applicable generally accepted accounting principles or practices; and

such additional factors as the General Partner or Conflicts Committee determines in its sole discretion to be relevant, reasonable or appropriate under the circumstances.

A related party transaction that is approved by the Conflicts Committee is conclusively deemed to be fair and reasonable to us. Under our Partnership Agreement, the material facts known to the General Partner or any of our affiliates regarding the transaction must be disclosed to the Conflicts

LOGO59


Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

Committee at the time the committee gives its approval. When approving a related party transaction, the Conflicts Committee considers all factors it considers relevant, reasonable or appropriate under the circumstances, including the relative interests of any party to the transaction, customary industry practices and generally accepted accounting principles.

Under our Partnership Agreement, in the absence of bad faith by the General Partner, the resolution, action or terms so made, taken or provided by the General Partner with respect to approval of the related party transaction will not constitute a breach of our Partnership Agreement or any standard of fiduciary duty.

Under our related person transactions policy, as well as under our Partnership Agreement, there is no obligation to take any particular conflict to the Conflicts Committee as empaneling that committee is entirely at the discretion of the General Partner. In many ways, the decision to engage the Conflicts Committee can be analogized to the kinds of transactions for which a Delaware corporation might establish a special committee of independent directors. The General Partner considers the specific facts and circumstances involved. Relevant facts would include:

the nature and size of the transaction (i.e., transaction with a controlling unitholder, magnitude of consideration to be paid or received, impact of proposed transaction on the General Partner and holders of common units);

the related person’s interest in the transaction;

whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances;

if applicable, the availability of other sources of comparable services or products; and

the financial costs involved, including costs for separate financial, legal and possibly other advisors at our expense.

When determining whether a related party transaction is in the normal course of our business and is (a) on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being provided to or available from unrelated third parties or (b) fair to us, taking into account the totality of the relationships between the parties involved (including other transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous to us), the General Partner considers any facts and circumstances that it deems to be relevant, including:

the terms of the transaction, including the aggregate value;

the business purpose of the transaction;

the relative interests of any party to such conflict, agreement, transaction or situation and the benefits and burdens relating to such interest;

whether the terms of the transaction are comparable to the terms that would exist in a similar transaction with an unaffiliated third party;

any customary or accepted industry practices;

any applicable generally accepted accounting principles or practices; and

such additional factors as the General Partner or the Conflicts Committee determines in its sole discretion to be relevant, reasonable or appropriate under the circumstances.

60LOGO


  Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee of the Board oversees the Partnership’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.

The Partnership’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Audit Committee reviewed with Ernst & Young LLP the firm’s judgment as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Partnership’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards.

The Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed under applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The Audit Committee received written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from management and the Partnership.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 for filing with the SEC.

The Audit Committee

Angela A. Minas, Chair

Name and Address(1)

  Number of
Common
Units(2)
   Percentage of
Outstanding
Common Units
  Number of
Preferred Units
   Percentage of
Outstanding
Preferred Units
  Percentage of
All
Outstanding
Voting Units(3)
 

ALPS Advisors, Inc.(4)

   12,335,027    11.7  —     —    11.0

FR XIII Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings LLC(5)

   11,257,436    10.7  —     —    10.0

CIBC Private Wealth Group, LLC(6)

   —     —    9,755,026    13.7  * 

Diaco Aviki

   124,283    *   —     —    * 

John Black

   85,979    *   —     —    * 

Steven M. Dougherty(7)

   273,302    *   —     —    * 

Warren H. Gfeller

   65,964    *   —     —    * 

Robert T. Halpin

   550,839    *   —     —    * 

Janeen S. Judah

   21,879    *   —     —    * 

Joel C. Lambert

   346,024    *   —     —    * 

David Lumpkins

55,571*— — *

Angela A. Minas

8,186*— — *

William H. Moore

238,534*— — *

Robert G. Phillips

1,166,1691.1— — 1.0

Gary D. Reaves

8,065*— — *

John J. Sherman

3,245,4633.1— — 2.9

Frances M. Vallejo

  13,981*— — * 
LOGO61

Clay C. Williams


8,186*— — *

  Proposal 3 – Ratification of Appointment

  of Independent Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditors of the Partnership for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. Ernst & Young LLP has audited the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements since 2013. The 2022 audit of the Partnership’s annual consolidated financial statements was completed on February 24, 2023.

The Board of Directors is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP for ratification at the Annual Meeting. The submission of this matter for approval by unitholders is not legally required, but the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee believe the submission provides an opportunity for unitholders through their vote to communicate with the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee about an important aspect of corporate governance. If the unitholders do not ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection of that firmexecutive officers as the Partnership’s auditors.

The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to retain, evaluate and replace the Partnership’s auditors. The unitholders’ ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP does not limit the authority of the Audit Committee to change auditors at any time.

The Company expects that representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if they desire to do so.group (15 persons)(8)

5,965,9705.7— — 5.3

 

LOGO

The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR"

the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young
LLP as the independent auditor of the Partnership
for 2023.
*

Less than one percent.

(1)

62LOGO


  Audit and Other Fees

The Audit Committee has approvedUnless otherwise indicated, the use of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent principal accountant. All services provided by our independent principal accountant are subject to pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is informed of each engagement of the independent principal accountant to provide services to us.

We have engaged Ernst & Young LLP as our independent principal accountant. The following table summarizes fees we were billed by Ernst & Young LLPcontact address for independent auditing, tax and related services for each of the last two fiscal years:

($ millions)

  

2022

   

2021 

 

Audit-related fees(1)

  $2.9   $1.8  

All other fees(2)

   0.2    0.1  

Total

  $3.1   $1.9  

(1)

Includes fees related to the performance of the annual audit and quarterly reviews (including internal control evaluation and reporting) of the consolidated financial statements of Crestwood Equity and Crestwood Midstream and its subsidiaries.

(2)

Includes fees primarily associated with other SEC filings.

LOGO63


   PROPOSAL 4 – TO APPROVE THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE

   CRESTWOOD EQUITY PARTNERS LP 2018 LONG TERM

   INCENTIVE PLAN (THE “LTIP PROPOSAL”)

The Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), was adopted by the Board of Directors of our General Partner (the “Board”) and approved by the unitholders on May 10, 2018. At this Annual Meeting, unitholders will be asked to approve an increase in the number of units available for issuance under the LTIP (the “Third Amendment”) by 2,500,000 units. If approved by the Partnership’s unitholders at the Annual Meeting, the Third Amendment to the LTIP will become effective April 1, 2023. The terms of the Third Amendment is attached hereto as Annex A. If the Third Amendment becomes effective, the Partnership will register the additional units on a Registration Statement on Form S-8 as soon as practicable following the effective date.

Summary of the Third Amendment to the LTIP

The use of unit-based awards under the LTIP continues to be a key element of the Partnership’s compensation program. The purpose of the Third Amendment is to increase the number of common units that the Partnership may issue under the LTIP by 2,500,000 units, from 4,000,000 to 6,500,000 units. As of February 17, 2023, 2,005,476 units associated with outstanding awards were expected to vest, and there were no options, vested and unvested, outstanding and unexercised. No other equity awards were outstanding under the LTIP as of such date. Of the 4,000,000 units currently authorized for issuance under the LTIP, there remain only 1,516,305 units available for grant as of February 17, 2023.

Consequence of Failing to Approve the LTIP Proposal

If this LTIP Proposal and the Third Amendment is not approved by the Partnership’s unitholders, the LTIP will continue to be effective, and there will be no impact on the rights of existing award holders under the LTIP. However, if this LTIP Proposal and the Third Amendment is not approved by the Partnership’s unitholders, we do not expect to be able to issue any meaningful equity-based compensation awards pursuant to the LTIP to eligible employees and directors in the future, and the Partnership would be required to reevaluate our compensation programs in general.

Summary of the Amended Plan

Equity-based compensation awards have always been integral to our compensation strategy and we have used grants of equity-based awards to provide employees, consultants and directors with incentive compensation awards to encourage superior performance and enhance the ability of our General Partner, the Partnership and their respective affiliates to attract and retain the services of individuals who are essential for the growth and profitability of the Partnership and to encourage them to devote their best efforts to advancing the business of the Partnership. Therefore, to attract, retain and motivate non-employee directors, officers and key management employees of exceptional abilities and, in recognition of the significant contributions to the long-term performance and growth of the Partnership and its subsidiaries made by these individuals, the Board has adopted the Third Amendment to the LTIP, subject to unitholder approval. Approval of the Third Amendment will permit the Partnership to continue to use unit-based compensation to align unitholder and employee interests and to motivate employees and others providing services to the Partnership or any subsidiary. While the Board is cognizant of the potential dilutive effect of compensatory awards, it also recognizes the significant motivational and performance benefits that are achieved from making such awards. The Board determined that an increase of 2,500,000 units was appropriate based on a number of factors, including: the current number of units available under the LTIP, the number of units that remain subject to outstanding options, phantom units and restricted units, the potential dilutive effects on the Partnership’s unitholders, the Partnership’s historical annual burn rates, and the anticipated future needs for equity to be able to attract and retain key employees and members of our leadership team.

64LOGO


Proposal to Approve the Third Amendment to the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP Proposal”)

Description of the LTIP Plan

The following description is a summary of the principal provisions of the LTIP, including the terms of the Third Amendment. A copy of this Third Amendment is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A, and you should refer to the LTIP for further details of the plan and awards that may be made thereunder. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to Annex A and the terms of the LTIP.

Key Terms of the LTIP

Plan Term

The LTIP automatically expires 10 years from the date of the First Amendment to the LTIP, unless, if earlier, the LTIP is terminated by the Board or the committee appointed by the Board to administer the LTIP, or the date all available common units available have been delivered. Awards granted prior to the LTIP’s termination date will continue to be effective in accordance with their respective terms and conditions even after the LTIP’s termination.

Eligible Participants

Any (i) employee of us, our General Partner, or the respective affiliates either who performs services for or on behalf of us or an affiliate, (ii) independent contractor, other than a member of the Board, who performs services for the benefit of us or our General Partner or an affiliate of either; or (iii) a member of the Board or a board of directors of an affiliate who is not an employee of consultant are eligible to receive awards under the LTIP.

Common Units
Authorized for
Issuance

2,500,000, subject to adjustment to prevent dilution or enlargement of LTIP benefits in the case of equity restructurings, transactions and similar changes in our capitalization.

Award Types

Options, Unit Appreciation Rights, Restricted Units, Phantom Units, Distribution Equivalent Rights, Other Unit-Based Awards, Cash Awards, Unit Awards, Substitute Awards, and Performance Awards.

Change of Control

Defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following events: (i) any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer (in one or a series of related transactions) of all or substantially all of the assets of Crestwood Partners, LLC (“Crestwood Partners”) or us to any Person or its Affiliates, other than our General Partner, us or any of our affiliates; (ii) the consolidation, reorganization, merger, recapitalization, exchange, division or other similar transaction (in one transaction or a series of related transactions) (any such transaction or series of transactions referred to herein as a “Merger”) pursuant to which (a) more than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding equity interests in the General Partner or its successor entities cease to be owned, directly or indirectly, by the Partnership, (b) more than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding equity interests in the Partnership or its successor entities cease to be, directly or indirectly, owned immediately following the Merger by the owners of such interests immediately prior to the Merger, or (c) the General Partner or one or more other Affiliates of the Partnership cease to be general partner(s) of the Partnership or its successor; (iii) a person or group other than the Partnership or its consolidated subsidiaries directly or indirectly becoming the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act) of more than 35% of the voting power of the then outstanding common units of the Partnership or its

LOGO65


Proposal to Approve the Third Amendment to the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP Proposal”)

successor; or (iv) individuals who, as of the date hereof, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board or of the board of directors or equivalent body of any successor parent of the Partnership or of the General Partner; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election or nomination for election by the Partnership’s unitholders was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board in the ordinary course of business shall be considered as though such individual was a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board or otherwise outside the ordinary course of business.
Notwithstanding the above, with respect to an award that constitutes a “deferral of compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A (“Section 409A”) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time (the “Code”), a “Change of Control” shall not occur unless that Change of Control also constitutes a “change in the ownership of a corporation,” a “change in the effective control of a corporation,” or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of a corporation’s assets,” in each case, within the meaning of Section 1.409A-3(i)(5) of the Treasury Regulations, as applied to non-corporate entities.

Restrictions on
Options and Unit
Appreciation Rights

The exercise price of an Option or Unit Appreciation Right that does not provide for the deferral of compensation under Section 409A (except by reason of satisfying the short-term deferral rule set forth under Section 409A) may be no less than the fair market value of the underlying units as of the date of grant, except with respect to substitute awards granted in connection with a merger, consolidation or acquisition.

Other Provisions

Awards are non-transferrable, except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution; no automatic grants are provided; no excise tax gross-ups are provided.

Purpose of the LTIP

The purpose of the LTIP is to promote the interests of our General Partner, us and the affiliates of both us and our General Partner by providing to employees, consultants and directors incentive compensation awards to encourage superior performance. The LTIP is also contemplated to enhance the ability of our General Partner, us and our respective affiliates to attract and retain the services of individuals who are essential for our growth and profitability and to encourage them to devote their best efforts to advancing our business. In furtherance of such purpose, the LTIP provides for the issuance of a variety of equity-based grants, including grants of (i) options, (ii) unit appreciation rights, (iii) restricted units, (iv) phantom units, (v) cash awards, (vi) performance awards, (vii) distribution equivalent rights, and (viii) other unit-based awards (collectively or individually referred to as “Awards”).

The LTIP is not subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. The LTIP will be effective as of the date the LTIP is approved by our unitholders, and will terminate on the earliest of (i) the date terminated by the Board or the Compensation Committee of the Board, (ii) the date all available common units under the LTIP have been paid or issued, or (iii) the ten-year anniversary of August 20, 2021. Awards granted prior to the LTIP’s

66LOGO


Proposal to Approve the Third Amendment to the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP Proposal”)

termination date will continue to be effective in accordance with their respective terms and conditions even after the LTIP’s termination.

Administration of the LTIP

The LTIP will be administered by a committee (the “Committee”) of the Board, appointed by such Board, which will administer the LTIP pursuant to its terms and applicable laws, unless the Board declines to appoint a committee, in which case, the Board shall serve as the Committee and administer the LTIP. The Committee has broad discretion to administer the LTIP, interpret its provisions, and adopt policies for implementing the LTIP. This discretion includes the power to:

designate participants;

determine the type or types of Awards to be granted to a participant;

determine the number of common units to be covered by Awards;

determine the terms and conditions of any Award;

determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances Awards may be settled (including settlement in cash), exercised, canceled, or forfeited;

interpret and administer the LTIP and any instrument or agreement relating to an Award made under the LTIP;

establish, amend, suspend, or waive such rules and regulations and appoint such agents as it shall deem appropriate for the proper administration of the LTIP; and

make any other determination and take any other action that the plan administrator deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the LTIP.

The plan administrator may delegate any or all of its powers and duties under the LTIP, including the power to grant Awards, to the Chief Executive Officer of our General Partner. However, pursuant to any such delegation, the Chief Executive Officer of our General Partner would not be permitted to grant Awards to, or take any action with respect to any Award previously granted to, a person who is an officer subject to Rule 16b-3 promulgated by the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or a member of the Board.

Units Subject to the Plan

Subject to unitholder approval of the Third Amendment to the LTIP, the total aggregate number of common units that will be available for delivery with respect to Awards under the LTIP will be 4,016,305 units. This number consists of the 2,500,000 units being requested in connection with this Third Amendment, as well as 1,516,305 units that were still available for issuance, or were forfeited or otherwise generally terminated without delivery. As of December 30, 2022 (the last trading day of fiscal year 2022), the price per share of the Partnership’s common unit was $26.19. The units issued pursuant to Awards under the LTIP may be authorized and unissued units or units that the Partnership reacquired, including units purchased in the open market. Pursuant to the terms of the LTIP, if any Award is forfeited, canceled, exercised, settled in cash, or otherwise terminated without the actual delivery of common units pursuant to such Award, then any common units that are so forfeited, canceled, exercised, settled in cash, or otherwise terminated without the actual delivery of common units shall be available to satisfy future Awards under the LTIP.

The common units delivered pursuant to the LTIP shall consist, in whole or part, of (i) common units acquired in the open market, (ii) common units acquired from us (including newly issued units), our General Partner, any of our affiliates or any other person or (iii) any combination of the foregoing. The fair market value of a common unit on a given date will be the closing sales price of a common unit on the immediately preceding trading date.

LOGO67


Proposal to Approve the Third Amendment to the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP Proposal”)

Persons Who May Participate in the LTIP

Employees of us, our General Partner, or any of our respective affiliates, and the non-employee members of the Board, are eligible to receive Awards (the “Eligible Persons”). As of February 17, 2023, approximately 157 individuals, including 7 executive officers, 7 non-employee directors and 143 other employees were eligible to receive Awards under the LTIP. Eligible persons designated by the plan administrator to receive Awards under the LTIP are referred to as “Participants.” A Participant under the LTIP will be eligible, at the discretion of the plan administrator, to receive an Award pursuant to the terms of the LTIP and subject to any limitations imposed by appropriate action of the plan administrator or within the individual award agreement.

Awards under the LTIP

Options. Options may be granted under the LTIP to purchase a specific number of common units at a set exercise price. The exercise price of each option granted under the LTIP will be determined by the plan administrator at the time the option is granted, provided that each option may not have an exercise price that is less than the fair market value of a common unit on the date of grant unless the option is a substitute award, is exempt from Section 409A as a short-term deferral, or complies with Section 409A.

The plan administrator will determine the manner in which, and time or times at which, an option will vest and become exercisable, in whole or in part. The plan administrator will also determine the methods and form of payment for the exercise of an option (including, without limitation, payment in cash, check acceptable to us, withholding Units from the Award, a “cashless-broker” exercise through procedures approved by us, or any combination thereof) and the methods and forms in which common units will be delivered to a Participant.

Unit Appreciation Rights. A unit appreciation right is an Award that, upon exercise, entitles the holder to receive the excess, if any, of the fair market value of a common unit on the exercise date over the grant price of the unit appreciation right. The excess may be paid in cash and/or in common units as determined by the plan administrator in its discretion. The plan administrator will have the authority to determine to whom unit appreciation rights will be granted, the number of common units to be covered by each grant, and the conditions and limitations applicable to the exercise of the unit appreciation right. The grant price per unit appreciation right will be determined by the plan administrator at the time the unit appreciation right is granted, but each unit appreciation right (other than a substitute award, an award that is exempt from Section 409A by reason of the short-term deferral rule, or an award that is compliant with Section 409A), must have an exercise price that is not less than the fair market value of a common unit on the date of grant. The plan administrator will determine the time or times at which a unit appreciation right may be exercised in whole or in part.

Restricted Unit Awards. A restricted unit is a common unit granted under the LTIP that is subject to a risk of forfeiture, restrictions on transferability, and any other restrictions that may be imposed by the plan administrator in its discretion. The plan administrator will have the authority to determine to whom restricted units will be granted, the number of restricted units to be granted to each Participant, the duration of any restrictions, the conditions under which the restricted units may become vested or forfeited, and any other terms and conditions as the plan administrator may establish with respect to the Awards. Upon or as soon as reasonably possible following the vesting of each restricted unit, subject to any applicable federal income tax withholding, a Participant will be entitled to have the restrictions removed from his or her Award so that the Participant then holds an unrestricted common unit.

To the extent provided by the plan administrator in its discretion, a grant of restricted units may provide that a distribution made by us with respect to the restricted units (a “Unit Distribution Right” or “UDR”) will be subject to the same forfeiture and other restrictions as the restricted unit.

68LOGO


Proposal to Approve the Third Amendment to the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP Proposal”)

If restricted, UDRs will be held, without interest, until the restricted unit vests or is forfeited, with the UDR being paid or forfeited at the same time, as the case may be. Absent a restriction on UDRs in the applicable Award agreement, UDRs will be paid to the holder of the restricted unit without restriction at the same time as cash distributions are paid by us to our unitholders.

Phantom Unit Awards. A phantom unit is a right to receive a common unit or an amount of cash equal to the fair market value of a common unit if certain conditions set forth in the Award agreement are met. The plan administrator will have the authority to determine the eligible persons to whom phantom units will be granted, the number of phantom units to be granted to each Participant, and any other terms and conditions as the plan administrator may establish. Upon vesting of each phantom unit, subject to any applicable federal income tax withholding, the Participant will be entitled to settlement of the phantom unit and shall receive either a common unit or cash equal to the fair market value of a common unit, as determined by the plan administrator in its discretion and as provided in the applicable Award agreement.

Distribution Equivalent Rights. To the extent provided by the plan administrator in its discretion, an Award granted under the LTIP may include a contingent right, granted in tandem or as a separate Award to receive an amount of cash, units, restricted units and/or phantom units, as determined by the plan administrator, equal to the value of any distributions made by us with respect to a common unit during the period such Award is outstanding (a “Distribution Equivalent Right” or “DER”). A DER grant may provide that the DER will be paid directly to the Participant, be credited to a bookkeeping account (with or without interest in the discretion of the plan administrator), be subject to the same vesting restrictions as a respective tandem Award, or be subject to other provisions or restrictions as determined by the plan administrator in its discretion and as provided in the applicable Award agreement.

Unit Awards. The LTIP permits the grant of units under the LTIP in a number determined by the plan administrator in its discretion, as a bonus or additional compensation or in lieu of cash compensation the individual is otherwise entitled to receive, in such amounts as the plan administrator determines to be appropriate.

Other Unit-Based Awards and Cash Awards. The LTIP also permits the grant of “other unit-based awards,” which are awards that, in whole or in part, are valued or based on or related to the value of a common unit. The vesting of other unit-based awards may be based on a Participant’s continued service, the achievement of specified performance criteria or other measures. On vesting (or on a deferred basis upon specified future dates or events), other unit-based awards may be paid in cash and/or in units, as determined by the plan administrator. The LTIP also permits the grant of cash awards, as an element of or supplement to, or independent of any other Award under the LTIP.

Performance-Based Awards. The right of a Participant to exercise, vest in or receive settlement of any Award, and the timing thereof, may be subject to such performance conditions as the plan administrator may specify. Performance conditions may be based on one or more performance goals as determined by the plan administrator.

Other Provisions

Tax Withholding. We or one of our affiliates will be authorized to withhold from any Award, from any payment due or transfer made under any Award or from any compensation or other amount owing to a Participant, the amount (in cash, common units, other securities or other property) of any applicable taxes payable with respect to the grant of an Award, its exercise, the lapse of restrictions applicable to an Award or in connection with any payment relating to an Award or the transfer of an Award and to take such other actions as may be necessary to satisfy the withholding obligations with respect to an Award. With respect to any Participant who is subject to Rule 16b-3, such tax withholding shall be effected in a way to ensure that such withholding is exempt from Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act pursuant to Rule 16b-3 or other applicable exemption.

LOGO69


Proposal to Approve the Third Amendment to the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP Proposal”)

Anti-Dilution Adjustments. Upon the occurrence of any “equity restructuring” event that could result in an additional compensation expense under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”) if adjustments to Awards with respect to such event were discretionary, the plan administrator will equitably adjust the number and type of common units covered by each outstanding Award and the terms and conditions of such Award to equitably reflect the restructuring event, and the plan administrator will adjust the number and type of common units with respect to which future Awards may be granted under the LTIP. Upon the occurrence of a similar event that would not result in a FASB ASC Topic 718 accounting charge if adjustments to Awards were discretionary, the plan administrator shall have complete discretion to adjust Awards in the manner it deems appropriate. In the event the plan administrator makes any such adjustments, a corresponding and proportionate adjustment shall be made with respect to the maximum number of common units available under the LTIP and the kind of units or other securities available for grant under the LTIP.

Change of Control. If specifically provided in an Award agreement, upon a Change of Control, the Award may automatically vest and be payable or become exercisable in full, as the case may be. “Change of Control” for purposes of the LTIP has the meaning set forth above.

Amendment. The Board or the plan administrator may terminate or amend the LTIP or any part of the LTIP at any time in any manner, including increasing the number of common units that may be granted, subject to the requirements of the securities exchange upon which the common units are listed at that time and of applicable tax and securities laws. The plan administrator may also waive any conditions or rights under, amend the terms of or alter any outstanding Award as long as no such change would materially reduce the rights or benefits of a Participant without the consent of the Participant or cause the LTIP or cause such Award to fail to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

Transferability of Awards. Options and unit appreciation rights are only exercisable by the Participant during the Participant’s lifetime, or by the person to whom the Participant’s rights pass by will or the laws of descent and distribution. No Award or right granted under the LTIP may be assigned, alienated, pledged, attached, sold or otherwise transferred or encumbered and any such purported transfer shall be void and unenforceable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the plan administrator may, in its discretion, allow a Participant to transfer an Award without consideration to an immediate family member or a related family trust, limited partnership, or similar entity on the terms and conditions established by the plan administrator from time to time; and (ii) an Award may be transferred pursuant to a domestic relations order entered or approved by a court of competent jurisdiction upon delivery to us of a written request for such transfer and a certified copy of such order.

Forfeiture of Awards. Unless waived by the plan administrator or otherwise provided in a written agreement between us and a Participant, an unvested Award that is still outstanding will be forfeited by the Participant upon termination of the Participant’s employment with or service to our General Partner or its affiliates or membership on the Board, as applicable.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following discussion is for general information only and is intended to summarize briefly the United States federal tax consequences to Participants arising from participation in the LTIP. This description is based on current law, which is subject to change (possibly retroactively). The tax treatment of Participants in the LTIP may vary depending on the particular situation and may, therefore, be subject to special rules not discussed below. No attempt has been made to discuss any potential foreign, state, or local tax consequences. In addition, options or unit appreciation rights that provide for a “deferral of compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A, phantom units, and certain other Awards that may be granted pursuant to the LTIP could be subject to

70LOGO


Proposal to Approve the Third Amendment to the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP Proposal”)

additional taxes unless they are designed to comply with certain restrictions set forth in Section 409A and the guidance promulgated thereunder.

Options; Unit Appreciation Rights

Participants will not realize taxable income upon the grant of an option or a unit appreciation right. Upon the exercise or, if later, the settlement of an option or a unit appreciation right, a Participant will recognize ordinary compensation income (subject to withholding) in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the amount of cash or the fair market value of the common units received, over (ii) the exercise price (if any) paid therefore. A Participant will generally have a tax basis in any common units received pursuant to the exercise of a unit appreciation right, or pursuant to the cash exercise of an option, that equals the fair market value of the common units on the date of exercise. Subject to the discussion under “Tax Code Limitations on Deductibility” below, we or one of our affiliates will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes that corresponds as to timing and amount with the compensation income recognized by a Participant under the foregoing rules.

When a Participant sells the common units acquired as a result of the exercise of an option or unit appreciation right, any appreciation (or depreciation) in the value of the common units after the exercise date is treated as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss for federal income tax purposes, depending on the holding period. The common units must be held for more than 12 months in order to qualify for long-term capital gain treatment.

The LTIP allows the plan administrator to permit the transfer of Awards in limited circumstances. See “Other Provisions — Transferability of Awards.”

The Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has not provided formal guidance on, nor even specifically addressed, the income tax consequences of a transfer of options or unit appreciation rights. However, the IRS has informally indicated that after a transfer of options (other than to a former spouse pursuant to a domestic relations order), the transferor will recognize income, which will be subject to withholding, and FICA/FUTA taxes will be collectible at the time the transferee exercises the option. If options are transferred to a former spouse pursuant to a domestic relations order, the transferee will recognize ordinary income upon exercise by the transferee, which will be subject to withholding, and FICA/FUTA taxes (attributable to and reported with respect to the transferor) will be collectible from the transferee at such time. Options granted under the LTIP and that are transferred will likely be subject to the same tax treatment. The transfer of an option may result in gift tax consequences to a Participant.

Phantom Unit Awards; Restricted Unit Awards

A Participant will not have taxable income at the time of the grant of a phantom unit Award, but rather, will generally recognize ordinary compensation income at the time such Participant receives common units or a cash payment in satisfaction of the phantom unit Award in an amount equal to the fair market value of the common units received or the cash payment, whichever is applicable. In addition, the Participant will be subject to ordinary income tax upon the payment of a DER. In general, a Participant will recognize ordinary compensation income as a result of the receipt of common units pursuant to a restricted unit Award in an amount equal to the fair market value of the common units when the common units are received over the amount, if any, paid for such units, provided, that if the common units are not transferable or are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture when received, the Participant will recognize ordinary compensation income in an amount equal to such excess based on the fair market value of common units (i) when the common units first become transferable or are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, in cases where a Participant does not make a valid election under Section 83(b) of the Code, or (ii) when the common units are received, in cases where a Participant makes a valid election under Section 83(b) of the Code.

LOGO71


Proposal to Approve the Third Amendment to the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP Proposal”)

A Participant who is an employee will be subject to withholding for federal, and generally for state and local, income taxes at the time such Participant recognizes income under the rules described above with respect to common units or cash received. Directors must make their own arrangements for satisfying any tax obligations they may incur in connection with the receipt of an Award under the LTIP. Distributions that are received by a Participant prior to the time that the common units are taxed to the Participant under the rules described in the preceding paragraph are taxed as additional compensation, not as distributions on common units. The tax basis in the common units received by a Participant will equal the amount recognized by such Participant as compensation income under the rules described in the preceding paragraph plus the amount, if any, paid for the common units, and the Participant’s capital gains holding period in those common units will commence on the later of the date the common units are received or the restrictions lapse (provided that, if a valid election under Section 83(b) of the Code is made with respect to restricted units, then the holding period in such units will begin on the date of receipt of the units).

Subject to the discussion immediately below, we or one of our affiliates will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes that corresponds as to timing and amount with the compensation income recognized by a Participant under the foregoing rules.

Tax Code Limitations on Deductibility

In order for the amounts described above to be deductible by us or one of our affiliates, the amounts must constitute reasonable compensation for services rendered or to be rendered and must be ordinary and necessary business expenses.

New Plan Benefits

The Awards, if any, that will be made to eligible persons under the LTIP are subject to the discretion of the plan administrator and, therefore, we cannot currently determine the benefits or number of units subject to Awards that may be granted in the future to eligible employees, officers and directors under the LTIP, or the amount or the number of units that would have been granted to the eligible individuals had the LTIP been in place during the prior fiscal year. The Partnership made its annual equity awards under the LTIP for fiscal year 2022 to the NEOs, non-employee directors, and to its other eligible employees. The grants to the NEOs are reflected in the “Fiscal Year 2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” section that can be found on page 47 of this proxy statement. The grants to the non-employee directors are reflected in the “Director Compensation for 2022” table on page 20.

72LOGO


Proposal to Approve the Third Amendment to the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP Proposal”)

As of the date of this proxy statement, the following Awards have been granted under the LTIP since August 20, 2021:

Name and Position, or Group, as Applicable

  Dollar Value ($)(1)  Number of Units  

All Named Executive Officers:

      

  Robert G. Phillips, Founder, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

    12,411,576    475,904

  Robert T. Halpin, President

    5,131,683    196,767

  John W. Black, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

    1,543,675    59,190

  William H. Moore, Executive Vice President, Corporate Strategy

    3,808,176    146,019

  Steven M. Dougherty, Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer

    3,571,004    136,925

  Joel C. Lambert, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal, Compliance and Safety Officer

    4,032,177    154,608

All Current Executive Officers as a Group

    32,901,380    1,261,556

All Current Directors as a Group

    1,622,228    62,202

All Employees as a Group, Excluding Current Executive Officers

    36,841,077    1,412,618

(1)

The amounts reported in this column were computed based on the closing price of our common units on February 17, 2023, which was $26.08 per share.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

As of the date of the adoption of the Third Amendment to the LTIP, the number of units that may be delivered with respect to awards under the LTIP may not exceed 4,016,305 units, subject to specified anti-dilution adjustments.

Vote Required

The approval of a majority of the votes cast by our common unitholders is required to approve the LTIP Proposal. Votes “for” and “against” and abstentions count as votes cast. Thus, abstentions have the effect of a vote against the LTIP Proposal. Executed proxies returned by a broker or other nominee holding common units in “street name” indicating that the broker or other nominee does not have discretionary authority as to certain common units to vote on the proposals (a “broker non-vote”) do not count as votes cast. The number of votes cast “for” the LTIP Proposal must represent a majority of the votes cast in respect of the LTIP Proposal in order to be approved. A properly executed proxy submitted without voting instructions will be voted (except to the extent that the authority to vote has been withheld) “FOR” the LTIP Proposal.

Recommendation

LOGO

The Board Unanimously recommends a

vote "FOR" Approval of the

LTIP Proposal.

LOGO73


  Other Information


Expenses of Solicitation

The accompanying proxy is solicited by and on behalf of the Board of Directors, and the cost of such solicitation will be borne by the Partnership. D.F. King & Co., Inc. may solicit proxies by personal interview, mail, telephone, and electronic communications. We will pay $25,000 for additional proxy solicitation services. We will also supply proxy materials to brokers and other nominees to solicit proxies from beneficial owners and we will reimburse them for their expenses in forwarding solicitation materials. Solicitations also may be made by personal interview, mail, telephone, and electronic communications by directors, officers, and other employees of the Partnership without additional compensation.

Other Matters

As of the date of this proxy statement there are no other matters that we intend to present, or have reason to believe others will present, at the Annual Meeting. If, however, other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the accompanying proxy authorizes the persons named as proxies or their substitutes to vote on such matters as they determine appropriate.

Proposals of Unitholders

Our Partnership Agreement includes separate advance notice provisions applicable to unitholders desiring to bring nominations for directors before an annual unitholders’ meeting other than pursuant to the Partnership Agreement’s proxy access provisions or to bring proposals before an annual unitholders’ meeting other than pursuant to Rule 14a-8. These advance notice provisions require that, among other things, unitholders give timely written notice to the General Partner regarding such nominations or proposals and provide the information and satisfy the other requirements set forth in the Partnership Agreement.

To be timely, a unitholder who intends to present nominations or a proposal at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Unitholders other than pursuant to the Partnership Agreement’ proxy access provisions or Rule 14a-8 must provide the information set forth in the Partnership Agreement to the General Partner no later than the close of business on the 90th day, nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day, prior to the first anniversary of this Annual Meeting. However, if we hold the 2023 Annual Meeting of Unitholders more than 30 days before, or more than 70 days after, the anniversary of the 2022 Annual Meeting date, then the information must be received no earlier than the 120th day prior to the 2023 Annual Meeting date, and not later than (i) the 90th day prior to the 2023 Annual Meeting date and (ii) the tenth day after public disclosure of the 2023 Annual Meeting date, whichevertable is later. If a unitholder fails to meet these deadlines and fails to satisfy the requirements of Rule 14a-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we may exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies we solicit to vote on any such proposal as we determine appropriate.

We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any nomination or proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.

Householding; Availability of Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement

A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “2022 Annual Report”) accompanies this proxy statement. If you and others who share your mailing address own common units in street name, meaning through a bank, brokerage firm, or other nominee, you may have received a notice that your household will receive only one annual report

74LOGO


Other Information

and proxy statement, or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, from each company whose units are held in such accounts. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce the volume of duplicate information and reduce printing and postage costs. Unless you responded that you did not want to participate in householding, you were deemed to have consented to it, and a single copy of this proxy statement and the 2022 Annual Report (and/or a single copy of our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials) has been sent to your address. Each street name unitholder receiving this proxy statement by mail will continue to receive a separate voting instruction form.

If you would like to revoke your consent to householding and in the future receive your own set of proxy materials (or your own Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable), or if your household is currently receiving multiple copies of the same items and you would like in the future to receive only a single copy at your address, please contact Investor Relations at (832) 519-2200, or write to Crestwood Equity Partners LP, 811 Main Street, Suite 3400, Houston, Texas 77002, and indicate your name, the name of each of your brokerage firms or banks where your common77002.

(2)

Excludes 425,087 unvested performance phantom units are held, and your account numbers. The revocation of a consent to householding will be effective 30 days following its receipt. You will also have an opportunity to opt in or opt out of householding by contacting your bank or broker.

If you would like an additional copy of the 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K, this Proxy statement, or the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, these documents are available in digital form for download or review by visiting Key Investor Materials at www.crestwoodlp.com/investors. Alternatively, we will promptly send a copy of these documents to you without charge upon request by mail to Investor Relations, Crestwood Equity Partners LP or Crestwood Midstream Partners LP, 811 Main Street, Suite 3400, Houston, Texas 77002, or by calling 832-519-2200. Please note, however, that if you did not receive a printed copy of our proxy materials and you wish to receive a paper proxy card or voting instruction form or other proxy materials for the purposes of the Annual Meeting, you should follow the instructions included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

If you own common units in street name, you can also register to receive all future unitholder communications electronically, instead of in print. This means that linksgranted to the annual report, proxy statement, and other correspondence will be deliveredPartnership’s executive officers pursuant to you via e-mail. Holders in street name should follow the instructions received from your bank or broker to register for electronic delivery.

LOGO75


Annex A

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE

CRESTWOOD EQUITY PARTNERS LP

2018 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

WHEREAS, Crestwood Equity GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “General Partner”), the general partner of Crestwood Equity Partners LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”) has previously adopted the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”);Plan.

(3)

WHEREAS,Percentage of all outstanding voting unit amounts reflects the General Partner now desires to amend the Plan to increasesum of (i) outstanding Common Units and (ii) the number of units available for issuance pursuant toCommon Units underlying the Plan;

WHEREAS, the Plan was previously amended pursuant to the First Amendment to the Plan which amendment was effective immediately prior to the closing of the acquisition by the Partnership of all of the outstanding limited liability company interests in the General Partner (the “First Amendment Effective Date”)

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended pursuant to this Third Amendment as follows effective April 1, 2023 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), subject to approval of the Partnership’s unitholders at the 2023 Annual Meeting:

1.

The first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Plan shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:Preferred Units, on an as-converted basis.

(4)

“Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) and Section 7, the numberBased on Schedule 13G filed by ALPS Advisors, Inc. on February 13, 2023. The address of Units that may be delivered on and after the First Amendment Effective Date, with respect to Awards under the PlanALPS Advisors, Inc. is 6.5 million and includes 4 million Units available as of the First Amendment Effective Date and an additional 2.5 million Units available as of the Third Amendment Effective Date.”1290 Broadway, Suite 1000, Denver, CO 80203.

2.

As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Third Amendment to be on the Amendment Effective Date, effective for all purposes as provided above.

CRESTWOOD EQUITY GP, LLC
By:
Name:Robert G. Phillips
Title:Founder, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer

A-1


LOGO


LOGO

P.O. BOX 8016, CARY, NC 27512-9903

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! PLEASE VOTE BY:

LOGO

INTERNET

Go To: www.proxypush.com/CEQP

•  Cast your vote online

•  Have your Proxy Card ready

•  Follow the simple instructions to record your vote

LOGO

PHONE Call1-866-318-2454

•  Use any touch-tone telephone

•  Have your Proxy Card ready

•  Follow the simple recorded instructions

LOGO

MAIL

•  Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card

•  Fold and return your Proxy Card in the postage-paid envelope provided

LOGOYou must register to attend the meeting online and/or participate at www.proxydocs.com/CEQP

 

24


(5)

Based on Schedule 13D filed by FR XIII Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings LLC on September 19, 2022. The address of FR XIII Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings LLC is 262 Harbor Drive, Third Floor, Suite 3100, Stamford, CT 06902.

Crestwood Equity Partners LP
(6)

Based on Schedule 13G filed by CIBC Private Wealth Group, LLC. on January 10, 2023. The address of CIBC Private Wealth Group is 181 West Madison Street, Chicago, IL 60602.

Annual Meeting of Holders
(7)

Mr. Dougherty resigned from his position as Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, effective June 30, 2023.

For Holders of record as of March 15, 2023
(8)

Includes 26,847 Common Units held by Jeff Cathey, the Partnership’s Senior Vice President, Controller and principal accounting officer.

 

TIME:

25


INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN OPPOSITION TO MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON

As of September 22, 2023, the directors and executive officers of the Managing General Partner as a group owned approximately 5.7% of the issued and outstanding Common Units, and, together with persons who then beneficially owned more than 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Units, owned approximately 28.1% of the issued and outstanding Common Units. Our directors and executive officers do not own, beneficially or of record, any Preferred Units.

Holders of the Common Units have interests that are different from and may conflict with the interests of the Preferred Holders. While all directors comprising the Board seek to act in the best interest of the Partnership and, indirectly, in the best interests of all equityholders, our directors may have a conflict of interest when the interests of the holders of the Common Units differ from those of Preferred Holders.

No Preferred Holder will be treated differently from any other Preferred Holder in connection with the Consent Solicitation.

26


WHERE YOU CAN OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The Partnership is subject to the information and periodic requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and, in accordance therewith, files annual, quarterly, and current reports and other information with the SEC. The SEC maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. You can access the Partnership’s SEC filings, including this Consent Solicitation Statement, free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.

The Partnership maintains a website at https://www.crestwoodlp.com. The reference to this website does not constitute incorporation by reference of any information contained on, or accessible through, such website, and you should not consider the contents of such website in making a decision regarding whether to consent to the Proposed Amendment.

27


INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE

The SEC allows the Partnership to “incorporate by reference” information from other documents that the Partnership files with the SEC, which means that the Partnership can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this Consent Solicitation Statement. Certain information that the Partnership files after the date of this Consent Solicitation Statement with the SEC will automatically update and supersede the information included or incorporated by reference herein. The Partnership incorporates by reference into this Consent Solicitation Statement the documents listed below, which were filed with the SEC, and such documents form an integral part of this Consent Solicitation Statement:

 Thursday, May 11, 2023 2:00 PM, Central Time
PLACE:Annual Meeting to be held live via the Internet -
please visit www.proxydocs.com/CEQP for more details.

This proxy is being solicitedour Annual Report on behalf ofForm 10-K for the Board of Directors

The undersigned hereby appoints Robert T. Halpin, Joel C. Lambert and Michael K. Post (the “Named Proxies”), and each or either of them, as the true and lawful attorneys of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and revocation, and authorizes them, and each of them, to vote all the units of Crestwood Equity Partners LP which the undersigned is entitled to vote at said meeting and any adjournment thereof upon the matters specified and upon such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, conferring authority upon such true and lawful attorneys to vote in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting and revoking any proxy heretofore given.

THE UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, UNITS WILL BE VOTED IDENTICAL TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. In their discretion, the Named Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (SEE REVERSE SIDE) but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordancefiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (SEC File No.  001-34664) filed with the Board of Directors’ recommendation. The Named Proxies cannot vote your units unless you sign (onSEC on February 27, 2023;

our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the reverse side)fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2023 and return this card.June 30, 2023 filed with the SEC on May  4, 2023 and August 3, 2023, respectively; and

PLEASE BE SURE TO SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY CARD AND MARK ON THE REVERSE SIDEour Current Reports on Form 8-K filed on January 10, 2023, January  17, 2023, January  19, 2023, January  30, 2023, April  4, 2023, April  25, 2023, May  15, 2023, June  29, 2023, July  27, 2023, August  16, 2023 (pertaining to the Partnership’s entry into the merger agreement) and September 26, 2023.

The Partnership is also incorporating by reference any future filings it makes with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date of this Consent Solicitation Statement and prior to the expiration or termination of the Consent Solicitation, except that, unless otherwise indicated, the Partnership is not incorporating any information furnished under Item 2.02 or Item 7.01 of any Current Report on Form 8-K. Any statement contained in this Consent Solicitation Statement or in a document (or part thereof) incorporated or considered to be incorporated by reference in this Consent Solicitation Statement shall be considered to be modified or superseded for purposes of this Consent Solicitation Statement to the extent that a statement contained in this Consent Solicitation Statement or in any other subsequently filed document (or part thereof) that is or is considered to be incorporated by reference in this Consent Solicitation Statement modifies or supersedes that statement. The modifying or superseding statement need not state that it has modified or superseded a prior statement or include any other information set forth in the document that it modifies or supersedes. Any statement so modified or superseded shall not be considered, except as so modified or superseded, to constitute part of this Consent Solicitation Statement.

The Partnership will provide, without charge, to each person to whom a copy of this Consent Solicitation Statement is delivered, upon written request of such person, a copy of any documents incorporated into this Consent Solicitation Statement by reference other than exhibits thereto unless such exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference in the document that this Consent Solicitation Statement incorporates. You may obtain documents incorporated by reference by requesting them in writing or by telephone at the following address and telephone number:


Crestwood Equity Partners LP

Annual Meeting of HoldersAttention: Corporate Secretary

Please make your marks like this:    811 Main Street, Suite 3400

Houston, Texas 77002

Telephone: (832) 519-2200

PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR CONSENT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE SO THAT IT WILL BE COUNTED. AS NOTED ABOVE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE:

FOREXPIRATION DATE IS 5:00 P.M., EASTERN TIME, ON PROPOSALS 1, 2, 3 AND 4OCTOBER 17, 2023 (UNLESS EARLIER CONCLUDED, TERMINATED OR EXTENDED). ANY CONSENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE EXPIRATION DATE WILL NOT BE COUNTED.

 

28


CRESTWOOD EQUITY PARTNERS LP

Questions and requests for assistance or additional copies of the Consent Solicitation Statement may be directed to the Information and Tabulation Agent at the address below. Holders should retain their Preferred Units and not deliver any such Preferred Units to the Information and Tabulation Agent.

The Information and Tabulation Agent for the Consent Solicitation is:

D.F. King & Co., Inc.

48 Wall Street, 22nd Floor

New York, New York 10005

Banks and Brokers call: (212) 269-5550

All others call toll free: (800) 290-6424

ceqp@dfking.com

The Solicitation Agent for the Consent Solicitation is:

BofA Securities

Bank of America Tower

620 South Tryon Street, 20th Floor

Charlotte, North Carolina 28255

Attention: Liability Management

Toll-Free: (888) 292-0070

Collect: (980) 387-3907

Email: debt_advisory@bofa.com

29


ANNEX A – PROPOSED AMENDMENT

A-1


FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE

SIXTH AMENDED AND RESTATED

AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

OF

CRESTWOOD EQUITY PARTNERS LP

This First Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Sixth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Crestwood Equity Partners LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), dated as of August 20, 2021, (the “Partnership Agreement”), is entered into effective as of     , 2023, at the direction of Crestwood Equity GP LLC, as the Managing General Partner of the Partnership (the “Managing General Partner”), pursuant to authority granted to it in Section 13 of the Partnership Agreement. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Partnership Agreement.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Section 5.8 of the Partnership Agreement sets forth the rights, powers, privileges, preferences, duties and obligations of the Preferred Units;

WHEREAS, on August 16, 2023, the Partnership entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Energy Transfer LP (“Energy Transfer”), Pachyderm Merger Sub LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Transfer (“Merger Sub”), and, solely for the purposes of Sections 2.1(a), 2.1(b), 2.1(c) and 5.21 thereof, LE GP, LLC, pursuant to which the Partnership will merge with and into Merger Sub (the “Merger”), with Merger Sub surviving the merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Transfer;

WHEREAS, in connection with the Merger, the Partnership and the Managing General Partner desire to amend Section 5.8 of the Partnership Agreement as set forth herein;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.8(d)(ii)(A) of the Partnership Agreement, the affirmative vote of a Super-Majority Interest, voting separately as a class with one vote per Preferred Unit, shall be necessary to amend the Partnership Agreement in any manner that alters or changes the rights, powers, privileges or preferences or duties and obligations of the Preferred Units in any material respect; and

WHEREAS, the Partnership and the Managing General Partner conducted a consent solicitation pursuant to which such affirmative vote was obtained.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, conditions and agreements contained herein, the Managing General Partner does hereby agree as follows:

A. Amendments.

Section 1.1 is hereby amended to add the following definition:

“Energy Transfer Merger”means the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 16, 2023, by and among Energy Transfer LP, Pachyderm Merger Sub LLC, solely for the purposes of Sections 2.1(a), 2.1(b), 2.1(c) and 5.21 thereof, LE GP, LLC, and the Partnership.

A-2


Section 5.8(c) of the Partnership Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows:

(c) Distributions.

(i) Beginning with the first Quarter ending after the Effective Time, the Preferred Holders as of the applicable Record Date shall be entitled to receive distributions in accordance with the following provisions:

(A) The Partnership shall pay a cumulative distribution of $0.2111 per Quarter in respect of each Outstanding Preferred Unit, subject to adjustment in accordance with Sections 5.8(c)(i) and (ii) (the “Preferred Unit Distribution Amount” and such distribution, a “Preferred Unit Distribution”). For the avoidance of doubt, the Preferred Unit Distribution Amount for the first Quarter ending after the Effective Time shall be calculated for a full Quarter, notwithstanding the fact that the Preferred Units may have been issued after the beginning of such Quarter as a result of the Effective Time occurring during such Quarter.

(B) Each Preferred Unit Distribution paid for any Quarter after the Initial Distribution Period shall be paid in cash at the Preferred Unit Distribution Amount unless (x) no distribution is made with respect to such Quarter pursuant to Section 6.3 or 6.4 with respect to the Parity Securities and Junior Securities (including the Common Units, the Class A Units or the General Partner Interest) and (y) the Partnership’s Available Cash is insufficient to pay the Preferred Unit Distribution; provided, however, that for purposes of this Section 5.8(c)(i)(B), Available Cash shall not include any deduction to provide funds for distributions under Section 6.4 in respect of any one or more of the next four Quarters. If the Partnership fails to pay in full in cash any distribution (or portion thereof) which any Preferred Holder accrues and is entitled to receive pursuant to this Section 5.8(c)(i)(B), then (x) the amount of such accrued and unpaid distributions will accumulate until paid in full in cash,and (y) commencing as of the first day of the calendar Quarter that commences immediately following the Quarter with respect to which such distribution was payable, the Preferred Unit Distribution Amount shall be $0.2567 per Quarter, subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 5.8(c)(ii) (the “Deficiency Rate”), until such time as all accrued and unpaid distributions are paid in full in cash and (z) the Partnership shall not be permitted to, and shall not, declare or make (i) any distributions in respect of any Junior Securities and (ii) any distributions in respect of any Parity Securities, other than Class A Preferred Pro Rata Distributions, unless and until all accrued and unpaid distributions on the Preferred Units have been paid in full in cash.

Notwithstanding anything in this Section 5.8(c) to the contrary, with respect to Preferred Units that are converted into Common Units, the holder thereof shall not be entitled to a Preferred Unit Distribution and a Common Unit distribution with respect to the same period, but shall be entitled only to the distribution to be paid based upon the class of Units held as of the close of business on the applicable Record Date, together with all accrued but unpaid distributions on the converted Preferred Units.

Any accrued and unpaid distributions shall be increased at a rate of 2.8125% per Quarter. Accrued and unpaid distributions in respect of the Preferred Units will not constitute an obligation of the Partnership.

Subject to and without limiting the other provisions of this Section 5.8, each Preferred Unit shall have the right to share in any special distributions by the Partnership of cash, securities or other property (including in connection with any spin-off transaction) and in the form of such cash, securities or other property Pro Rata with the Common Units, as if the Preferred Units had converted into Common Units at the then-applicable Conversion Ratio;provided,however¸ that at any time there are accrued but unpaid distributions on the Preferred Units, no such special distributions shall be permitted. For the avoidance of doubt, special distributions shall not include regular Quarterly distributions paid in the normal course pursuant to Section 6.3 or 6.4,provided that any such regular Quarterly distribution is not paid at a rate that is in excess of 130% of the Quarterly distribution rate for the immediately preceding Quarter.

A-3


Subject to and without limiting the other provisions of this Section 5.8, each Preferred Unit shall have the right to receive, and will share pro rata with holders of Common Units (as if the Preferred Units had converted into Common Units at the then-applicable Conversion Ratio) in, any portion of any cash distribution made in the normal course pursuant to Section 6.3 or 6.4 (a “Quarterly Distribution”) that is in excess of the Specified Distribution Amount. For purposes of this paragraph, “Specified Distribution Amount” means an amount that is the greater of (A) the amount of the highest previously paid Quarterly Distribution, on a per Common Unit basis, after the date of the Energy Transfer Merger (as adjusted for combinations, splits, subdivision and similar transactions) and (B) the amount equal to 115% of the Quarterly Distribution, on a per Common Unit basis, for the immediately preceding Quarter.

Subject to and without limiting the other provisions of this Section 5.8, at any time there are accrued but unpaid distributions on the Preferred Units, no special distributions shall be permitted.

All distributions payable on the Preferred Units shall be paid Quarterly, in arrears, on the earlier of: (A) the date that distributions are made on the Common Units for such Quarter pursuant to Section 6.3(a), and (B) the date that is forty-five (45) days after the end of such Quarter.

For the avoidance of doubt, any Available Cash that is distributed pursuant to Section 6.3 or 6.4 shall be distributed in accordance with this Section 5.8(c).

Section 5.8(d) of the Partnership Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety as follows:

(d) Voting Rights.

(i) The Preferred Units will have such voting rights pursuant to this Agreement as such Preferred Units would have if they were converted into Common Units, at the then-applicable Conversion Ratio, and shall vote together with the Common Units as a single class, except that the Preferred Units shall be entitled to vote as a separate class on any matter on which Unitholders are entitled to vote that adversely affects the rights, powers,privileges or preferences of the Preferred Units in relation to other classes of Partnership Interests or as required by law. Except as otherwise provided herein, (i) if (A) the three (3) largest Preferred Holders collectively constitute a Super-Majority Interest and (B) GSO COF II Holdings Partners LP, Magnetar Financial LLC, and each of their respective Affiliates collectively own at least 35% of the Outstanding Preferred Units, the approval of a Super-Majority Interest of the Outstanding Preferred Units shall be required to approve any matter for which the Preferred Holders are entitled to vote as a separate class, and (ii) otherwise, the approval of a majority of the Outstanding Preferred Units shall be required to approve any matter for which the Preferred Holders are entitled to vote as a separate class (each, a “Voting Threshold”).

(ii) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, in addition to all other requirements imposed by Delaware law, and all other voting rights granted under this Agreement:

(A) the affirmative vote of a Super-Majority Interest, voting separately as a class with one vote per Preferred Unit, shall be necessary to amend this Agreement in any manner that (1) alters or changes the rights, powers, privileges or preferences or duties and obligations of the Preferred Units in any material respect, (2) except as contemplated herein, increases or decreases the authorized number of Preferred Units (including without limitation any issuance of additional Preferred Units, other than PIK Units), or (3) otherwise adversely affects the Preferred Units, including without limitation the creation (by reclassification or otherwise) of any class of Senior Securities (or amending the provisions of any existing class of Partnership Interests to make such class of Partnership Interests a class of Senior Securities);provided,however, that the Partnership may, without the affirmative vote of a Super-Majority Interest (subject to the Restrictions set forth below), create (by reclassification or otherwise) and issue Junior Securities and Parity Securities (including by amending the provisions of any existing class of Partnership Interests to make such class of Partnership Interests a class of Junior Securities or Parity Securities) in an unlimited amount, with respect to Junior Securities, and, with respect to Parity Securities, in an amount not to exceed $300 million in aggregate face value and that shall not be convertible into more than 48,125,000 Common Units, subject to appropriate adjustment in accordance with Section 5.8(b)(xi),provided that such Junior Securities (other than Common Units) or Parity

A-4


Securities will not (x) have a stated date of maturity or be redeemable for cash (other than in connection with a Cash COC Event) or (y) provide for payment of distributions in cash at any time when (i) the Preferred Unit Distributions are not paid in cash or (ii) there are accrued and unpaid distributions on the Preferred Units (collectively, the “Restrictions”);

(B) to the extent that any proposed amendment to this Agreement having an effect described in clause (1), (2) or (3) of Section 5.8(d)(ii)(A) above would adversely affect any Preferred Holder in a disproportionate manner as compared to any other Preferred Holder, the consent of such Preferred Holder so adversely and disproportionately affected, in addition to the affirmative vote of a Super- Majority Interest pursuant to Section 5.8(d)(ii)(A), shall be necessary to effect such amendment;

(C) the affirmative vote of the then-applicable Voting Threshold of the Outstanding Preferred Units, voting separately as a class with one vote per Preferred Unit, shall be necessary prior to designating the Preferred Units, including the PIK Units, as Designated Preferred Stock (as defined in the Crestwood Indentures) under the Crestwood Indentures or, to the extent applicable, any future indenture of the Partnership or any Subsidiary of the Partnership; and

(D) the affirmative vote of a Super-Majority Interest, voting separately as a class with one vote per Preferred Unit, shall be necessary prior to the Partnership making an election to be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal tax law purposes.

(i) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the Preferred Units shall not have any voting rights or rights to consent or approve any action or matter, except as set forth in Section 13.3(c), this Section 5.8(d) or as otherwise required by Delaware law.

(ii) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Partnership, without the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the Outstanding Preferred Units, voting as a separate class, the Managing General Partner shall not adopt any amendment to this Agreement that the Managing General Partner determines would have a material adverse effect on the rights, powers, preferences, duties or special rights of the Preferred Units; provided, however, that (i) subject to Section 5.8(d)(iii), the issuance of additional Partnership Interests (and any amendment to this Agreement in connection therewith) shall not be deemed to constitute such a material adverse effect for purposes of this Section 5.8(d)(ii) and (ii) for purposes of this Section 5.8(d)(ii), no amendment of this Agreement in connection with a merger or other transaction in which the Preferred Units remain Outstanding with the terms thereof materially unchanged in any respect adverse to the Preferred Holders (as determined by the Managing General Partner) shall be deemed to materially and adversely affect the rights, powers, privileges or preferences of the Preferred Units.

(iii) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, without the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the Outstanding Preferred Units, voting as a class, together with the holders of any other Parity Securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable, the Partnership shall not (x) create or issue any Parity Securities (including any additional Preferred Units) if the cumulative distributions payable on Outstanding Preferred Units (or any Parity Securities, if the holders of such Parity Securities vote as a class together with the Preferred Holders pursuant to Section 5.8(c)) through the most recent payment date have not been paid on all Outstanding Preferred Units or (y) create or issue any Senior Securities.

(iv) For any matter described in this Section 5.8(d) in which the Preferred Holders are entitled to vote as a class (whether separately or together with the holders of any Parity Securities), such Preferred Holders shall be entitled to one vote per Preferred Unit. Any Preferred Units held by the Partnership or any of its Subsidiaries or their controlled Affiliates shall not be entitled to vote.

A-5


Section 5.8(e) of the Partnership Agreement is hereby amended and restated as follows:

(e) Change of Control.

(i) In the event of a Cash COC Event, the Preferred Holders shall convert the Outstanding Preferred Units into Common Units immediately prior to the closing of the Cash COC Event at a conversion ratio equal to the greater of (A) the Conversion Ratio and (B) the quotient of (1) the product of (a) the Preferred Unit Price, multiplied by (b) the Cash COC Conversion Premium, divided by (2) the VWAP Price for the 10 consecutive trading days ending immediately prior to the date of closing of the Cash COC Event, subject to a $1.00 per unit floor on Common Units received, subject to payment of any accrued but unpaid distributions to the date of conversion in accordance with Section 5.8(b)(iv);

(ii) If a Change of Control (other than a Cash COC Event) occurs, then each Preferred Holder shall, at its sole election:

(A) convert all, but not less than all, Preferred Units held by such Preferred Holder into Common Units, at the then-applicable Conversion Rate, subject to payment of any accrued but unpaid distributions to the date of conversion in accordance with Section 5.8(b)(iv);

(B) if (1) either (x) the Partnership is not the surviving entity of such Change of Control or (y) the Partnership is the surviving entity of a Change of Control but the Common Units are no longer listed or admitted to trading on the New York Stock Exchange or another National Securities Exchange and (2) the consideration per Common Unit received by the holders of Common Units in such Change of Control exceeds $1.00, then, at the election of such Preferred Holder, the Partnership shall use its best efforts to deliver or to cause to be delivered to the Preferred Holders, in exchange for their Preferred Units upon such Change of Control, a security in the surviving entity that has substantially similar terms, including with respect to economics and structural protections, as the Preferred Units (a “Substantially Equivalent Unit”); provided, however, that, if the Partnership is unable to deliver or cause to be delivered a Substantially Equivalent Unit to any such electing Preferred Holder in connection with such Change of Control, each such Preferred Holder shall be entitled to (x) take any action otherwise permitted by clause (A), (C) or (D) of this Section 5.8(e)(ii), or (y) convert the Preferred Units held by such Preferred Holder immediately prior to such Change of Control (other than (in the case of clauses (1) and (2) below) any PIK Units, which, solely with respect to a Change of Control contemplated by this Section 5.8(e)(ii)(B), shall be extinguished for no consideration upon the closing of such Change of Control) into a number of Common Units equal to: the quotient of (a) (i) 160% multiplied by the Preferred Unit Price plus (ii) accrued and unpaid distributions as of the effective date of the conversion with respect to the Preferred Units held by such electing Preferred Holder (including any distributions paid at the Deficiency Rate) less (iii) the sum of all cash distributions paid by the Partnership with respect to the Preferred Units held by such electing Preferred Holder during the Initial Distribution Period, prior to the Effective Time, held by such electing Preferred Holder or its predecessors in interest prior to the Initial Distribution Period, divided by (b) 0.97 multiplied by the VWAP Price for the 10 consecutive trading days ending immediately prior to the date of the closing of such Change of Control.

(C) if the Partnership is the surviving entity of such Change of Control and the consideration per Common Unit received by the holders of Common Units in such Change of Control exceeds $1.00, continue to hold Preferred Units; or

(D) require the Partnership to redeem the Preferred Units held by such Preferred Holder at a price per Preferred Unit equal to 101% of the Preferred Unit Price plus accrued and unpaid distributions to the date of such redemption with respect to each of the Preferred Units held by such electing Preferred Holder; provided, that in connection with the Energy Transfer Merger, such price per Preferred Unit shall be 108% of the Preferred Unit Price plus accrued and unpaid distributions to the date of such redemption with respect to each of the Preferred Units held by such electing Preferred Holder. Any redemption pursuant to this sub-clause D shall, in the sole discretion of the Managing General Partner,

A-6


be paid in either cash or a number of Common Units equal to quotient of (1) the product of (a) 101% of the Preferred Unit Price (or 108% in connection with the Energy Transfer Merger), multiplied by (b) the number of Preferred Units owned by such Preferred Holder that the Partnership has elected to redeem “in kind,” divided by (2) the greater of (i) $1.00 and (ii) the product of (x) 0.92 multiplied by (y) the VWAP Price for the 10 consecutive trading days ending immediately prior to such redemption date. Notwithstanding the preceding, the Partnership shall have no obligation to redeem any such Preferred Units in cash unless such redemption complies with the restricted payments covenant in the Indentures.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 5.8(e), any Change of Control in which the consideration to be received by the holders of Common Units has a value of less than $1.00 per Common Unit shall require the affirmative vote of the then-applicable Voting Threshold of the Outstanding Preferred Units, voting separately as a class with one vote per Preferred Unit.

All Common Units delivered upon any conversion or redemption of the Preferred Units in accordance with this Section 5.8(e) shall be (1) newly issued and (2) duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable Limited Partner Interests in the Partnership, except as such non-assessability may be affected by Section 17-607 or 17-804 of the Delaware Act, and shall be free from preemptive rights and free of any lien, claim, rights or encumbrances, other than those arising under the Delaware Act or the Partnership Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.

B. Agreement in Effect. Except as hereby amended, the Partnership Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

C. Applicable Law. This Amendment shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to principles of conflicts of laws.

D. Severability. Each provision of this Amendment shall be considered severable and if for any reason any provision or provisions herein are determined to be invalid, unenforceable or illegal under any existing or future law, such invalidity, unenforceability or illegality shall not impair the operation of or affect those portions of this Amendment that are valid, enforceable and legal.

[Signatures on following page]

A-7


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first written above.

MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER:
PROPOSAL

YOUR VOTE

BOARD OF

DIRECTORS

RECOMMENDS

Crestwood Equity GP LLC
1.    By: To elect the three directors named in the proxy statement to serve as Class II directors on the board of directors of our general partner, Crestwood Equity GP, LLC, until the 2026 annual meeting of unitholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualifiedLOGO
FORWITHHOLDName: 
1.01 David LumpkinsFOR
1.02 Frances M. VallejoFOR
1.03 Gary D. ReavesFOR
FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
2.To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, our named executive officer compensation.FOR
3.To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for Crestwood Equity Partners LP for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023.FOR
4.To approve the Third Amendment to the Crestwood Equity Partners LP 2018 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of units authorized for issuance.FOR
5.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.Title: 

You must register to attend the meeting online and/or participate at www.proxydocs.com/CEQP

Authorized Signatures - Must be completed for your instructions to be executed.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on your account. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the Proxy/Vote Form.

 

Signature (and Title if applicable)Date                    

Signature (if held jointly)

Signature Page to

First Amendment to the Sixth Amended and Restated

Agreement of Limited Partnership of

Crestwood Equity Partners LP

A-8

Date